BeingIs

Pointers for mature spiritual listeners in both English and Chinese.

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

没有‘觉醒’这个状态

读者：先生，请问《明白》后继续无限深入明白的过程中会有波动吗？哦，我察觉到了心智在纠结“最近体感为何没有刚明白时那个阶段那么强烈和震撼”和“敏感度（高低）”等叙述，不相信心智的叙述。随便了，不在乎了，去它的了。

BEINGIS：你说‘刚明白的时候，怎样怎样，，，’，这不是‘明白’或‘觉醒’，只是刚尝到一点味道。 ‘明白’或‘觉醒’是安静的，好像似发生什么又描述不出发生了什么的，无法衡量的， ‘明白’或‘觉醒’不是一个特别的体验，不是像你说的‘强烈和震撼’，当然，体验某段强烈和震撼的体验很好，一般是刚开始尝到味道，这不错，但不要把‘明白’定义为一个接一个特别的，强烈的，震撼的经验体验。根本就不要去期待某种特殊经验体验，静静无声地品味或察觉你自己的能量震荡，不管有没有结果。

‘明白后’？心智幻想出‘明白’是一个有前有后的事件。不是这回事。任何‘事件’都是心智的虚幻假设，包括‘觉醒’或‘明白’这样的事件。

在你的心智中，你想要追求一个名为“觉醒”或“开悟”的辉煌状态，好像进入天堂一样。不，这只是心智的欲望，是故事线的一部分，这样的目标不值得去追求。因为这本来就是你自己（SELF）的无限闪耀能量，根本不可能定义出一个叫做“觉醒”的状态。根本没有这样的状态存在。如果心智认为自己达到了某种美好的状态，并把那个状态定义为“觉醒”，这只是心智编造的谎言，不要被心智欺骗。

与其努力去达到某种美好的状态，不如专注于觉察心智对“达到任何状态”的欲望。只要心智里还挂着一个目标，并且急于去达成它，你就仍然被故事线所缠绕。

是的，你会明白你自己，或者会看到你自己。但不要期待存在某个明确的分界点，例如某种“觉悟”的状态会在某个地方出现。

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

No state of 'realization' or 'enlightenment'

Reader: Sir, after 'realization,' will there be fluctuations in the process of continuing to delve infinitely deeper into realization? Oh, I've just noticed that the Mind is tangled up in narratives like "Why doesn't the recent bodily sensation feel as intense and shocking as that phase right after I first realized?" and "sensitivity (high or low)," and not believing the mind's narratives. Whatever, don't care anymore, screw it.

BEINGIS: When you say "right after I first realized, it was this way or that...," that's not "realization" — it's just catching a faint taste of your own Radiant energy for the first time. "Realizing" is quiet, like something happens but you can't quite describe what, something immeasurable. "Realization" isn't a special experience, not like the "intense and shocking" you mentioned. Of course, having an intense and shocking experience is great — it's usually what happens when you first get a taste, and that's fine — but don't define "realization" as one special, intense, shocking experience after another. Don't even expect some kind of special experience at all. Just quietly, soundlessly savor or notice your own energy vibrating, whether there's a result or not.

“After realization”? The mind imagines “realization” as an event with a before and an after. That’s not what it is. Any “event” is an illusory assumption of the Mind, including events such as “awakening” or “realization”.

In your Mind, you want to seek a glorious state called 'realization', as if you enter paradise. No, this is the Mind's desire, it's part of the storyline, such goal is not worthy of seeking. Since this is your own Infinite Radiant Energy, there is never a possibility of defining a state of 'realization'. No such state exits. If the Mind thinks that a certain nice state is reached and such a state is defined as realization, this is lie told by the Mind, don't be duped by the Mind.

Instead of striving for reaching a nice state, focus on noticing the Mind's desire for reaching any state whatsoever. As long as there is a goal hanging in your Mind and you are anxious to reach it, you are still carried away by the storyline.

Yes, you will realize your SELF or will see your SELF. But don't expect that there is a demarcation point such as a state of 'realization' exits anywhere.

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

明确的断言，比如“某事不可能发生”，是否就是一种心智制造的叙述呢？

读者：那么，像“某事不可能发生”这样的明确说法，本身不也是一种心智叙述，因此没有真实性吗？

BeingIs：是的，任何明确的断言，例如“某事不可能发生”或“某事可能发生”，都是来自心智的叙述。心智投射出的任何断言都无法成立。让我们来看看这个断言“某事不可能发生”。什么是“某事”？这是心智定义的一个抽象概念。这个定义本身就已经无法成立，因为它看起来像“某事”，但实际上并不实在是“某事”。例如，在你的视觉范围内，心智把某个物体命名为“苹果”，因为它看起来像苹果，但它实际上并不实在是苹果，而只是心智定义为“苹果”的能量模式。再比如，心智把视觉范围定义为“空间”，但它实际上并不实在是一个叫“空间”的东西，视觉范围也不是真正的“场”，而是心智抽象出来并命名为“视觉场或空间”的能量模式。

接下来，我们来看“发生”或“不发生”。“发生”这个词是什么意思？“发生”这个词必须先基于一个叫“不发生”的状态才能成立。但你如何定义“不发生”的状态呢？是不是“不发生”这个状态的成立反过来必须先确定“发生”状态的成立呢？是不是心智的循环逻辑？这种定义完全是任意的。我们甚至无法确定“某事”是不是某事，更不用说确定它是否正在发生或没有发生。现在你可以看到，整个断言就是一个笑话。对于明白到这些断言只是笑话的那位来说，它们是娱乐性的、无害的。而对于把这些断言当真的那位来说，它们会导致痛苦。

大多数人认为心智的作用是“心理的”，或者是一种起源于“肉球”大脑的功能。这是一个很大的误解。心智效应远远超越，大于多于，且不同于“心理”和“大脑”这些概念。心智效应是无限闪耀能量（Infinite Radiant Energy）的根本诠释机制。正如这里从来没有一个“我”，也从来没有一个“大脑”。“我”的感觉和“我的大脑”的定义，都只是心智制造投射出来的概念定义。同样，大多数人误以为思考是由大脑完成的，不，思考是由心智效应完成的。毫不夸张地说，当你思考时，就是 THAT 在思考。

读者：所以可以说，一切可感知的事物都不是真实的，它们“存在”的唯一理由就是为了 THAT 的享受，而 THAT 是唯一真正的实相。但让我感兴趣的是，我如何才能认识到自己就是 THAT？

BeingIs：不，我并没有说一切可感知的事物都不是真实的。我是在指出，它们实际上并不是心智所描述的那样。你自己的能量效应当然是真实的，但心智得出的结论无法成立。例如，心智不断喂给你的结论是： “这是我在一个叫地球的星球上的生活。我在某个日期出生，以后会死去，然后世界会在我死后继续存在”。请注意，你正在经历的经验是你 自己（SELF） 的真实能量模式，但却不实在是“一个我在经历一生”这回事，这也不实在是“一个地球或一个世界”。实际上并没有“一个我在某个日期出生、过一段时间后死去”这些回事。而且可能会让你大为震惊的是，也不存在“世界在你死后继续存在”这回事。心智告诉你的一切实际上都无法成立，尽管原始经验本身是 100% 真实的。

所谓的世界甚至无法在你沉入深睡的夜晚中幸存，更不用说在“你死亡”后幸存。你体验的每一刻都是全新的。如果你明白了“看即是被看”，那就不难明白整个经验场只是“看”这个能量效应本身。当看这个效应消失时，整个被看见的一切也随之消失——啪！仿佛它们从未真正出现过一样，无处可寻。

你如何认识到自己就是 THAT？无论认识与否，你已经是 THAT，这是默认的。现在，你唯一需要注意的就是心智如何欺骗你，把笑话当成现实。谁在做真正的注意？当然，只有 THAT 才能做注意。心智可能会愚弄你，让你相信是“我”在注意。不，始终是 THAT 在注意。无论你是否能感觉到“我”的感觉，这里实际上从来都没有一个“我”。

读者：那么，什么可以被视为并被否定为我自己的能量效应呢？

BeingIs：就让注意自动进行即可。无需“考虑”或“否定”。当心智中看似地升起“考虑”或“否定”这样的逻辑时，也只需注意它们即可，这些逻辑无非是心智试图去理解它无法理解的东西。你越能注意到心智逻辑在流动，就越能变得敏感，并超越心智效应。心智效应并不是负面的，它是为了你自己（即 THAT）而存在的，让你注意到它所叙述的充满幻觉的结论，你可以对它们置之不理。

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

@linda2768461101 对， 心智就是叙述逻辑，或说是辨别机制。

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

每一刻都是神圣的，然而生活并没有意义

这个标题看起来自相矛盾。是的，对心智的逻辑来说，这句话无法被理解。你所能觉察到的每一丝觉知、每一刻，其实100%都是你自己（SELF）。你不可能觉知到任何不是你SELF的东西。这是绝对的、无条件的。即使心智把当下的体验解读为平凡、无聊或不如心意，它仍然是你自己的能量在完美地振动，毫无例外。每一瞬间、每一刻，都是你自己无限的闪耀能量在流动。每一秒，都是你自己的神圣在闪耀。

即使你看似卷入了一个威胁性的或负面的情境，这些‘威胁’和‘负面’的结论也只是心智想象出来的假设而已。真正发生的情况，远比这些假设无限地更大、更多、也完全不同。你可以放心地忽略这些假设，或者把它们当成笑话。一旦你完全不再把心智叙述出来的结论当真了，那么，比如，“威胁性的情境”？“厄运”？它们仍然还是像心智描述给你的那样吗？你会感到震惊的。

不要认为做家务是无聊生活的一部分。不要相信躺在床上什么都不做是在浪费时间。你体验的每一丝细微，都是神圣本身在自动地显现。时钟在滴答？品味你自己神圣的这一刻！在办公室工作？品味你自己神圣的这一刻！坐公交车回家？品味你自己神圣的这一刻！看似有人在欺负你？不，实际上根本不是那样，毫无例外，那只是你自己神圣的能量在流动，貌似出‘有人欺负我’这样的心智解释。

担心你的人生？担心你死后没人记得你？担心没有足够时间实现人生目标？不，完全不用担心。虽然它看起来像是一个属于“我”的生活，但实际上这根本不是什么“人生”。这是THAT（SELF）在自动地自行律动。或者你也可以说，这是THAT（或SELF）在自己做梦。真正的意义远比心智编造的“意义”无限地伟大。我能做出最接近的描述是：纯粹的自我娱乐。但这个描述仍然远不足以描述真正的意义，因为真正的意义比“娱乐”要无限地更满足。真正的意义可以被直接感受到，但无法被描述。不要去担心“生活的意义”。一个梦的故事并没有属于故事自己的意义。这个故事里其实并没有一个“我”。看似体验的一切很真实，其实完全是无实质的（或空性的）。相反，去品味你自己能量的每一丝丝的流动，看看它是多么完美、多么令你自己满足。

当你开始以这种方式看待自己的体验时，一种非常微妙的能量结构的重新排列会自动发生，甚至你都没有察觉到这样的微妙自动重组。然后，微妙的奇迹就会发生。毕竟，整个宇宙其实并不实在是一个宇宙，整个体验其实也不实在是一个体验，而只是你自己（SELF或THAT）的能量印象。你远远超越任何你看似正在体验的琐碎能量印象。一旦你开始如实地看你自己（SELF），没有什么是不可能的。

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

感到受限吗？

读者：你还会感到受限吗？你在各方面都感到自由吗？也许这不是个人层面的自由——不是让个人愿望简单实现的自由。但如果你就是THAT——如果你的个人意志已经消融，你的意志已完全与THAT合一——那么这是否意味着你的愿望每时每刻都在被满足？只有THAT存在；那么，为什么我的个体意志看起来与THAT不和谐？为什么似乎存在分离——是一种分离的幻觉吗？

BEINGIS：不，不！上面的问题显示出极大的误解。是的，我的身体一直都感到受限。例如，身体不能直接飞起来。如果我在天气变冷时忘记穿够衣服，我就会觉得冷，很可能发烧，身体会在一段时间内非常不舒服。例如，我无法得到心智想要的任何东西，我的愿望大多没有被满足。我之前说过很多次，个人意志并没有消融。我能感觉到“自己”，就像你一样。我能感觉到个人意志和思想的升起和落下。正如我没有要求去消融看似流过的故事情节一样，也没有要求去消融个人意志和感受。感受到个人性和拥有个人意志，是这个体验性故事情节不可或缺的一部分。

想要消融个人感受或个人意志的愿望，就像试图改善一场梦的故事情节一样，这种愿望本身正是梦故事情节的一部分。当你向我提出上述问题时，你还不够敏锐，还没有敏感到这些问题以及问题中所表达的愿望，恰恰是心智正在投射的幻觉解释。你可能会以为，这些想在故事情节中获得自由的愿望超出故事情节。不，这些愿望正是故事情节的一部分，或者说这些关于破梦的欲望本身恰恰就是梦故事本身。

自由不是通过让故事情节中那个叫“我”的角色在活动和感受中获得看似的自由而得到的。你想感到自由，以便能自由地成为亿万富翁，能自由地做别人做不到的事，你想让愿望成真。请注意，再注意一次，所有这些愿望都是梦幻般的故事情节的一部分。这些愿望表明，故事情节被当真了，把它们当成是实实在在发生的情况。

是的，只有THAT。身体的每一个动作实际上都是THAT的动作。感到不自由是THAT的自由。感到痛苦是THAT的享受。感到受限是THAT的娱乐。就像你昨晚可能梦到自己被关进监狱，而现在完全明白了，所有那些看似可怕的经历，不过是你自己的类似做梦一样的娱乐。经验看似感觉100%真实，但实际上什么都没有实在的发生。

不，空性故事情节中的角色不会变成THAT。为什么？就问自己这个问题：你是否渴望昨晚梦中的梦中角色变成THAT？心智解释出来的任何‘角色’早已经是THAT的能量印象了，不需要变成THAT已经是THAT了。通过发现到这些欲望本身就是笑话，在这一发现中，你现在就站在与THAT相同的位置。

与THAT完全合一？一切早已经完全同一，你不需要做任何额外的事。只要看着你的纯粹的经验并注意到，无论感受如何试图告诉你什么，一切都已与THAT完全同一，没有额外的‘合一’这样的步骤需要完成。所有这些来自感受的叙述，比如“没有自由”“受限”“受苦”，都不过是心智的虚幻描述，不要把这样的叙述当真。这些叙述就像你梦中的感受，不断告诉你：“这个故事很重要！这个故事很重要！快对它做点什么！”

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

Automatic doing

Reader: By your words, I get the impression that no idea has true meaning, and that there's no meaning behind experiences either. Therefore, I have no obligation to transcend anything, because the experience is simply happening. I'll take the inner dialogue of my mind less seriously.

BeingIs: Ideas do have meaning to the Mind that projects them. In other words, the Mind projects meaning and the Mind itself consumes the meaning. So, it's a self-justifying loop seemingly spinning within the Mind perpetually. But the meaning derived from these ideas don't actually hold. It's kind of like "I think this is A therefore it must be A...", a complete self-justifying hallucination. True meaning cannot be grasped and comprehended by the Mind. True meaning is not conceptual, is not communicated in words or ideas. I am not actually teaching you the true meaning. I am pointing to your own SELF so that you will taste the non-verbal meaning yourself directly. Only you can taste them, no one can teach you.

Transcending happens automatically by Infinite Radiant Energy, not by a 'you' or by 'your effort'. Your question reveals a misunderstanding that 'you have the obligations to transcend'. No, not like that, there is not actually a 'you' here having obligations to do anything. Automatic doing is being executed super efficiently and lightning fast without a 'you' or 'me' in driver's seat. Transcending is done automatically just like doing is executed automatic. For example, when you go to work, instead of thinking that 'you the person' is doing the work, you realize that the entire Infinite Radiant Energy is doing the work automatically, realizing this is transcending already. There is not a 'you' are doing the work, and there is not a 'you' are doing transcending. Both are done automatically by THAT. For example, many years ago, I got laid off from my previous job suddenly and needed a new job, realizing that all is my own energetic vibration, all is my own making, I didn't worry a bit about my prospect, then, suddenly, out of blue, the phone rang up, and a job offer came right up despite that I have not sent out even a single piece of resume, ... See, there is no effort from me, all was being done automatically. So, it's entirely different from your assumption that you need to do anything or things are being controlled by a 'you', quite contrarily, things are being done automatically, including transcending itself.

Reader: But as you replied to someone else in this post, everything is perfect, so I shouldn't worry so much about understanding anything anymore. But I can't help being intrigued and wanting to decipher what's behind my experience; I suppose this is part of the experience itself.

BeingIs: Getting intrigued and wanting to decipher is okay. You are correct, getting intrigued and want to figure out is integral part of the storyline. These urges are not beyond the storyline, but storyline itself. There is no problem for having these intrigues and desires. Noticing them as narratives from the Mind or notice them as contents of an empty story. Better still, view these intrigues, wonders, desires just like intrigues, wonders and desires in a dream. These urges are not your enemies, but harmless energetic patterning just like any other phenomenon in a dream.

Reader: And at the same time, it seems that I get tangled up and confused with myself, because if everything is perfect and transcendence is not needed, what need or reason do I have to not take the Mind seriously? And an immediate response arises, which is to avoid suffering.

BeingIs: The character in your dream last night, or a character right here in the current story is always confused and tangled up. This is the nature of the Mind. There is no cure for such confusion and entanglement. Why should these confusion and entanglement bother you? They are empty confusions and empty entanglement in a completely empty storyline. How can they bother you? unless you take them seriously. So, don't waste time trying to alleviate these conditions, just like you don't need to waste time alleviate any condition in a dream. Leave these confusions and entanglements alone!!! You are not actually inside the story at all. Although it seems that a character called "me" is confused and entangled in a story. That's not a problem. Don't own the story. You are perpetually perfect as THAT regardless of what kind of story that seems to flow by.

Oh, the Mind wants to get rid of suffering. But ironically, the suffering is actually produced by the Mind taking its own assumptions as concrete realities. So, getting rid of suffering is now equivalent to getting rid of the Mind? The Mind wants to kill the Mind itself. It's impossible.

No, suffering is not cured by avoiding them and suffering is not remedied by killing the Mind. Suffering is transcended by realizing all phenomena is dreamlike and insubstantial, nothing to be concerned about. Once such realization deepens, the seeming sense of "suffering" may go on for an extended period of time, but slowly and gradually, their taste start to change, the so-called "suffering" will seem to change flavors subtly, they are not as poignant as before, they are not as painful as before, they will start to taste as if it's kind of bitter-sweet initially and more and more sweet as your sensitivity increases, and apparently nothing seems to have changed on the surface.

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

Yes, there is no need for you (or the Mind) to worry about 'to-be' or 'not to-be' because all is already perfect, if it seems 'to be', it's perfect, if it seems 'not to-be', it's still perfect. Imperfection is assumed by the Mind only. Reality cannot not be perfect, and unconditionally perfect.

[BeingIs @Being_Is_IT]

Is a definite claim that "xyz acn't happen" a narrative from the Mind?

Reader: Also isn’t a definite saying like “xyz can’t happen” a mental narrative itself and therefore without truth?

BeingIs: Yes, a definite claim such as "xyz can't happen" or "xyz can happen" is narrative from the Mind. Any claim projected by the Mind does not stand. Let's look at this claim "xyz can't happen". What is "xyz"? this is an abstract concept defined by the Mind. This definition already doesn't stand because it may look like "xyx" but it's not actually xyz. For example, in your visual field, the Mind names an object "apple" because it looks like apple, but it's not actually apple, just an energetic patterning which the Mind defines as "apple". For example, the Mind defines the visual field as "space", but it's not actually a thing as space, the visual field is not actually a field, but an energetic patterning that the Mind abstracts to names such as "visual field or space".

Next, let's look at "happen" or "not happen". What does the word "happen" mean? The word "happen" must be based on a state called "not-happen" to be established first. But how do you define the state of "not-happen"? Such definition is totally arbitrary. We can't even be certain that "xyz" is xyz, let alone make certain it's happening or not happening. Now you can see, this entire claim is a joke. For someone who realizes these claims is a joke, they can be entertaining and harmless. For someone who takes the claims seriously, it leads to suffering.

Most people think of the effect of the Mind as "mental" or a function originated from a meat ball "brain". This is a big misunderstanding. The effect of the Mind is infinitely more than, bigger than and different from "mental" and "brain". The effect of the Mind is a fundamental interpretation mechanism of Infinite Radiant Energy. Just like there is never a "me" here, there is never a "brain" here. The sense of "me" and the projected definition of "my brain" are just conceptual definitions made by the Mind. Likewise, most people mistakes that thinking is done by the brain, no, thinking is done by the effect of the Mind. It's not exaggerate to say, when you think, THAT thinks.

Reader: So one could say that everything perceptible isn't real, and its reason for "be there" is solely for the enjoyment of THAT, which is the only true reality. But what intrigues me is, how can I recognize myself as THAT?

BeingIs: No, I didn’t say that everything perceptible isn’t real. I am pointing out that they are not actually what the Mind says they are. Your own energetic effect is of course real, but the conclusions reached by the Mind cannot be established. For example, the conclusions that the Mind is feeding you is: "this is my life on a planet called earth. I was born on a certain date and will die later, and then the world will go on without me after my death". Please notice, the experience that you are experiencing is real energetic patterning of your SELF, but this is not actually "a me going through a life" and it's not actually "an earth or a world". And there is not actually a "me born on a certain date and die a while later". And probably to your total shock, there is not such a thing called "the world surviving your death". As you can see, the Mind is telling you everything that can't actually stand, despite the fact that the raw experience itself is 100% real.

The so-called world doesn't even survive the night when you sink into deep sleep, let alone survive "your death". Every moment of your experience is simply brand new. If you realize that seeing is the seen, it won't be hard for you to realize that entirety of experiential field is the seer alone. When the effect of seeing is gone, the entire field of seen is gone, pop! nowhere to be found as if they never actually appeared in the first place.

How can you recognize yourself as THAT? Recognizing or not, you are already THAT, that is by default. Now, all you need to notice is how the Mind is tricking you to taking a joke as reality. Who is doing the actual noticing? Of course, THAT and only THAT can do the noticing. The Mind may fool you into believing that 'I' was doing the noticing. No, it's always THAT doing the noticing. There is never actually a 'I' here regardless you can feel the sense of 'I' or not.

Reader: So what could be considered and dismissed as my own energetic effect?

BeingIs: Just let noticing go on automatically. There is no need to "consider" or "dismiss". When there seems to be logic of "consider" or "dismiss" rising in your Mind, just notice them also, these logic are nothing more than the Mind is trying to make sense of that it can't make sense of. The more can you notice the logic of the Mind flowing through your experience, the more you get sensitive and transcend the function of the Mind. The function of the Mind is not a negativity, it's for you, i.e., THAT, to notice so that you know what it's narrating is full of illusory conclusions and you can leave them alone.