J

[J @Betheremaybe]

@LilBeanDip5012 @EWess92 Again, you have 0 idea what you are talking about. An appellate court can lack jurisdiction now to review an interlocutory decision, but that does not mean they will not have jurisdiction later once the action results in a judgment. Please work on yourself before commenting.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@LilBeanDip5012 @EWess92 Can you read? I never said SCOTUS would overturn this CA5 decision (which does not deal with the merits of the d.ct opinion). I said Judge K will be reversed on the merits, which is true more often than not historically (look at his reversal rate — sad!)

[J @Betheremaybe]

@HabCorpLinguist As always, disingenuous and unconvincing. That sort of surgery is not related at all to gender. Boob jobs (and other plastic surgery) and hair transplants are. If those procedures have similar consequences to hormones, etc., that’s a valid analogy. If not, then it’s not.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@AAGShumate @DHSgov No they haven’t, you idiot. This is a STANDING decision. It says NOTHING about your authority. Work on your reading comp.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@HabCorpLinguist Trump literally canned Cook and threatened to prosecute JPow because they wouldn’t print more money. Your side are the money printers. Cope and seethe.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@eesavka “We.” Sir, you are an undergrad. Opinion dismissed.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@HabCorpLinguist This is exactly what restrictionists said about Ellis Island immigrants (Jews, Italians, Poles). Like literally exactly this (they’re communists, anti-American, loyal to their nations, etc.). They were wrong then and you are just as wrong now.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@teafortillerman @AdamMortara Love to see that I’m still living rent free in your replies. Cope and seethe, you failed conservative movement lawyer! Unlike most of the chuds you associate with (who have some power and influence, regrettably), you have no clout, no following, and no notable cases. Sad!

[J @Betheremaybe]

@ishapiro You are a hack and a shanda.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@EWess92 You are pathetic and no one is persuaded by you. Judges should not be running political consulting firms. Full stop.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@eesavka @scotus_wire Silence, undergrad.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@ellebernstein Textbook fixed pie fallacy. The world would be better off (in all respects, including wealthier and cheaper burritos!) if you and others like you were deported. Inshallah!

[J @Betheremaybe]

@EWess92 If Eric claims a judge is “thorough and thoughtful,” you already know that he is a partisan hack (that his crony friends in the bar forum shop for, including by incorporating sham organizations in town, because he is the only judge in Lubbock). Eric is like the Jim Kramer of law!

[J @Betheremaybe]

@teafortillerman @HughLouisDewey Still waiting. Sad!

[J @Betheremaybe]

@teafortillerman @HughLouisDewey Again, I identified hundreds —. If you don’t want to engage, that’s on you. I’ll let others judge who is being reasonable in this exchange! They’re not sending their best folks.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@teafortillerman She is a citizen and cannot be deported, which you are well aware of. Your view — that Americans you disagree with ought to be forcibly removed from the country — is deplorable and, in a just world, would result in your being removed.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@TradVat2 @RegentLaw These lists are meaningless and should not be relied upon by anyone. Regent and “top 10” do not belong in the same sentence.

[J @Betheremaybe]

@EWess92 @JamesUthmeierFL @david_dewhirst Is the 11th Circuit defying SCOTUS? In this very case, SCOTUS denied a stay request from Florida! More evidence that fedsoc appellate judges have gone rogue!

[J @Betheremaybe]

@restoreorderusa ICE is doing this in fact! Is the truth “totally ridiculous”? Or is racial profiling a good thing?