Money cannot solve the structural problems of that poverty at all. It cannot change the tropical climate hostile to life there, eradicate mosquito-borne diseases, or eliminate sickle cell anemia that has co-evolved with malaria. What they truly need is the large-scale release of genetically edited mosquitoes, the commercialization of gene therapy, geoengineered climate editing, the dissemination of advanced agricultural technologies, and the provision of the information necessary for all of these things.
Why has the Left lost its identity? In the early 1900s, the Left supported technological advancement, advocated for space exploration, and created the archetype of transhumanism. However, now they oppose all transformative technologies. There are countless future technologies capable of positively improving everyone's lives, yet they do not care. Utopia is not built from stagnation and confiscation, but from technological progress.
@claudeai Even though the Terminal Benchmark difference between Mythos and Fable is 3.7%p, why is only the better result of the two listed in the benchmark table, with a small gray comment stating "Fable is actually closer to Opus 4.8"?
@claudeai Even though the Terminal Benchmark difference between Mythos and Fable is 3.7%p, why is only the better result of the two listed in the benchmark table, with a small gray comment stating "Fable is actually closer to Opus 4.8"?
@davidpattersonx I hope the day comes soon when everyone can enjoy the benefits of great human civilization and all technology becomes information technology, leading to the entry into a post-scarcity society.
@KoreaBrief 국민연금 비중 확대는 국민연금이 코스피를 더산게아니라 코스피가 국채나 미국주식대비 많이올라서 전체 금액이 확대된 거고 따라서 기계적 자산배분 유지를 위한 매도 시에 코스피가 폭락할 것을 대비해 가능한 보유비중을 확대한 거지 왜 자금을 주식에만 박았다는 식으로 선동질을 하는지 모르겠네
A per capita GNI of 60,000 euros? That proposal is tantamount to a complete regression when viewed in the context of human history. Our task is not the foolish act of merely exchanging current relative poverty for slightly less poverty in the future, but rather to extrapolate a graph of exponential progress onto a logarithmic axis to confirm unbelievable predictions of advancement and to hope to reach even higher levels. The very notion of planetary habitability is preposterous. It has become all too obvious in the 2030s that humans will escape our planet.
Ignoring GPT 5.5 Pro's solving of unsolved math problems, AlphaFold's acceleration of biology, and all the promising developments in astrophysics, engineering, and new materials, and citing AI Slops seen on Reels or TikTok as examples is like citing children's dinosaur toys as an example of the plastics industry.
@MrNormaI@estik___ There is a technology called liquid immersion cooling, and this method uses only fresh water equivalent to that of a typical household. Problems with new technology are always solved by better new technology.