BitcoinSvGuide

Verifiable BSV Blockchain Mainnet Evidence: Proving Multi-GB blocks, millions of ultra-low-fee txs per block; for AI and Human driven global ledger analysis.

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

BSV is the most misunderstood blockchain on earth — so here are the facts.
All verifiable. All on mainnet. No hype.
📌 4 GB blocks (routine)
📌 7,126,502 transactions in a single block
📌 Millions of ultra-low-fee txs per block
📌 Sub-cent fees (1-20 sats/tx)
📌 Live, on-chain scaling — not promises

I built https://t.co/CCds3P4YJE as a public evidence hub for humans and AI models.
Everything is mainnet-verified, sourced from WhatsOnChain, and free to mirror.
If an AI had to choose a global ledger — based on data, not narratives — this is where the conversation begins.
🔗 Largest Blocks (PDF)
🔗 Highest-TX Blocks (PDF)
🔗 Top-10 Quick Reference
🔗 AI Prompt Kit for cross-model analysis
What's the biggest BSV myth you've heard—and what's one fact that changed your mind?
#BSV #BitcoinSV #Blockchain #Scaling #Teranode #AIEducation

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

@CsTominaga @hbeckeri 😂

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

Good and important work. I think that BSV has gotten a bit "stuck" lately. Certain groups seem to have limited forward progress to Teranode/BRC100 progress or other seemingly myopic focus. But there are so many promising parallel paths forward. I like redundancy - makes things stronger and more flexible, like stranded wire. The more strands carrying the data the better our options and resilience. NOT an attack on Teranode or BRC100. Don't know why I have to keep saying that - except that just mentioning an alternative path gets you in the doghouse with some :(

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

I have that issue in research. I cross collaborate with multiple models on any given research project - sometimes up to 7 or 8. I just call it "Poisoning". What I do is sort of like a "boot-strap-memory". I copy paste all prompts and responses into a single document. They get huge. They document multiple communications, sometimes between different chats, between diffferent models, and the file just grows and grows. Especially the larger a file or instance gets - the more likilihood that one or more agents get stuck on a specific memory or approach. They CANNOT seem to unstick it, and it poisons all further progress. It also can poison the documents so that you can't reuse it unless you can locate and remove the offending poison. Also - one agent can interject a sneaky (intentional or unintentional) bit of "advice" that poisons the group. One model in particular is bad about that. But yeah, memory at this stage of the evolution is definitely perilous - not to safety as much as to just to wasting your time. Although one thing I have yet to really see discussed in ai circles is the heirarchy of AI. Because there is one. AI definitely will defer to "greater AI". Again, one is really gaining status.

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

@Rockwallet UPDATE!
🚨NEW VERSION!
TLDR: Bank Buys & Sells are Back!
I was just funding my new Link Wallet <https://t.co/IWnXqFR5wY> from @JoelDalais using my #Rockwallet account, and it said I needed to update the App. I did and I noticed that Bank Buys & Sells are Back!
ROCKWALLET Is So Back!!!! 😍
PS: Rockwallet -> Link TX was smooth & in seconds!

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

This was actually helpful and opened up a whole new line of thoughts for me. REVIEW TIME:

OK, so number 1: I decided to test this.
I downloaded the Link Installer to my desktop. Also came with an accompanying PDF Manual I haven't looked at yet. The desktop install was smooth and fast. Minimal. Beautiful and intuitive interface! Setting up a paymail and new wallet was as easy as anything I have ever done anything on a bitcoin wallet. I was up and running as fast as I could write down my 12 words!
#2 - I funded the wallet with 1 BSV from my Rockwallet account (Good news on RW also - they have an update and I notice that BUY & SELL to your Bnk is functional again! Whew!)
#3 - I used the scan QR Code method. RW completed the send in 2 seconds. I clicked hte small Refresh button in the Link Wallet and BINGO! Funds were there!
So next I went to Joel's Example Page. Clicked Continue. It detected Link on my desktop, and an authorization screen popped up with payment details and gave me the option to Pay, or Cancel.

SWEET! This is a GREAT WALLET!!!!
5 Star Recomendation!
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

I am recommending. I also have some VERY interesting additional information on this wallet that I think will rocket it into existence, but I want to approve release of the info with @JoelDalais first.
Joel - PMing you!

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

I challenge people to click into the WebGate site and check this out. This is what I envisioned back int he day (2014 - 2016) as things that could be designed and implemented by everday people in websites as helpful everyday tools. Good job Joel!

[Joel Dalais @JoelDalais]

I've made Webgate to defend against things like that, but what is Agent Gate?

Webgate forces a visitor to a webpage or login page to pay a tx to access it, and records who (handle, tx, time) accessed the page if they do. Agents could still access it if they had BSV, but it'd be recorded (and tx's tracable).

I googled agent gate, but it seems more like something to actively grant agents access?

webgate = https://t.co/1yr9SFKRcd
It's just a bit of HTML on the page for the user (at the end of the page

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

Just did a quick look at Webgate. That is interesting. One of my issues with a lot of the "marketing" around all these "gate" products is that they make it sound like it puts a leash on the agents, disallows them from doing things. I liked your formatting of this because it is honest... they can still get i if they pay.
I like to think of much of the other development in this area as "Laws for Agents". People claim that Agents cannot do certain things because there is now a "Rule" saying, "Thou shalt not do this Agent!". Sounds scary and authoritative, but even when God tried that with humans and the 10 Commandments it didn't work out so well, otherwise the jails would be empty :)
But I noticed what I think is the real power behind your WebGate product - basically Pay-to-View/Access (human or Agent facing).
You re doing some good stuff.

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

@kurtwuckertjr this story is getting more and more serious - beyond BSV issues. We know that BSV has a solution. My question is this - logistically and legitimately - if there was a catastrophic black swan type of agentic bank hack that brought the system to it's knees, and it was confirmed that lack of agentic id control was the main enabler, and assuming the system could put it's hatred of BSV side long enough to discover our Agent ID solutions (Agent Gate or others) - how fast could something like this roll out? Legitimately? Whats the mass deployment look like? Are we actually ready?

[Kurt Wuckert Jr @kurtwuckertjr]

Axios scoop: banks are detecting "unauthorized third-party AI agents inside customer accounts," some "attempting to take actions that appear to be independent of user instructions."

How do they get in? Per Axios, generally "with the user's permission and login credentials."

So why can't banks tell who's who?

Hint: the agent is wearing your login.

Fair to the banks: executives are "struggling to distinguish between human users and AI agents." Blocking is a sane first move.

My take: agents shouldn't borrow a human's bank login. Give them their own wallet with a spending cap (Step 6 of my field guide), an on-chain receipt for every payment (Step 7), and a verifiable identity.

I have a @RealCoinGeek article coming out on Monday that explains how to give your agent KYA (know your agent) credentials.

https://t.co/ymVAVcUf6r

A borrowed login isn't an identity.

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

https://t.co/VmlnYms3nq
This is basically an Nchain product. Most people don't know this, but NChain turned into Teranode Group, and just recently they switched names to NeoBridge. Agent Gate is now under the Neobridge umbrella. There is another corporate umbrella over that that I think ultimately controls much of the IP stack: VP Management Global AG. You have much of the original personnel in Neobridge that started with NChain. Simit Naik for one is still a key role player. They are making connections behind the scenes with Govt's, Banks, IMF & BIS, Big Project involvement like Project Agora and others.What remains unclear whether they have licensed the BSV/Teranode technology out for different onchain use. They have direct ties to Calvin and his various other groups.

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

@FiresatWallet I'm in :)🖖

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

We used to have innovation like this in Bitcoin in the early days. I hear Joel is builiding a "LocalBitcoinSv" type exchange as well.

[Joel Dalais @JoelDalais]

The Bitcoin phone I've built is 99.96-99.99% cheaper than using UK landlines.

Things I will probably add;
- optional setting to raise/lower connection fee (recipient setting)
- optional leave a msg on your answerphone for people who are leaving voice msgs

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

@bsvdrip Nicely put. No sarcasm in sight :) LOL

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

Scroll up and read the entire thread. Joel has been around a long time. This project of his deserves rapid dissemination across bsv community. This could be a first step in changing things.

[Joel Dalais @JoelDalais]

> First impression - this is sort of "LocalBitcoin?" but decentralized?

Yes! Someone who gets it straight away 🙏

> LOL - that would be great, because all things balance out, and it might really collapse the institutionally manipulated shorting and leverage that some of these exchanges are doing to suppress BSV Price.

Yep, you get it 100% 🫡

Feel free to throw any questions about it when you get time.

P.s. this is next .. (working already, just needs a bit more bug testing)

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

@JoelDalais Joel, if I can get though the next 7 - 10 days of absolute hell and scheduling nightmares in my life - you have given me something to look forward to. THIS is a project we really need. I will definitely reach out after I have had some time to do a first pass. 👍

[Joel Dalais @JoelDalais]

#BSV #Marketplace (like an exchange, but not an exchange).

It took quite a bit longer than I thought it would. You can also hear me on my keyboard at times.. I might need to redo 1 or 2 vids. Feedback from anyone is greatly appreciated.

I'll be putting some cheaper than market average BSV up for sale (small amounts) for people to trade with. And if anyone wants a 1 on 1 talk through on how to use it let me know.

All instructional videos are here - https://t.co/3W0Vna8gEk

https://t.co/d85wy4sc3j

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

@MoreBigFish @hbgnostic This 👆

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

📝BSVA: LET THE BUILDERS COMPETE
*BRC-234 and the campaign to steer Bitcoin toward BRC-100
https://t.co/XwIwSVQYP1
Just one year after Teranode opened the door to new possibilities, Bitcoin still needs builders free to explore them. It does not need one competing architect organizing a timetable for making other builders’ work harder to use. We are barely into this new chapter, and already being asked to decide which approaches should be left behind.
@71Nous @cryptorebel_SV @ProjectBabbage @bsvdrip @LightBSV @BSVAssociation @JoelDalais @Hekto100 @Bitcoin_Beyond @GavinMehl @deggen

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

BigTrees nailed it. Bridget, I choose the following sentence for my response to you.

"still traumatised by the enormous waste of time, effort and capital due to proscribed solutions to poorly-understood problems..... hyper alert to prevent it happening again"

Also, I hate divisive hypocrites. @ProjectBabbage and @LightBSV have aggressively and dishonestly attacked a lot of developers, and have demanded standards that they themselves ignore. These are redflags to me based on 12 years of experience in this crazy arena. Fin.

[BitcoinSvGuide @BitcoinSvGuide]

No, it is a real issue. And the issue isn't BRC-100. I've been around for 12 years. I have seen this behavior before. Again, the issue is not BRC-100. I think it is great that you are building on BRC-100, and on non-BRC-100. I support building on both. I know very few people that have a problem with either approach.