Biz

[Biz @BizMac88]

@brim006 Awful.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Rickisback_ON_X Perhaps their constituency supports them in this.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Maerox @Daractenus Oh dear. It appears you failed to comprehend the video. Watch it again...... And this time try to use YOUR brain.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@PoolFeline @Shilohmarx @AAGDhillon So...... Just like the Epstein file shit show.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@DailyNorseman Define " Long-Term".

[Biz @BizMac88]

@KOC4COTY There's a reason why Bud Grant didn't play rookies.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t Interesting topic for making your point. If there's one subject where the integrity of medical science has been put into question... it would be covid.
It also pays to remember that not everybody advertises their credentials online. It does not mean they don't have them.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t Were any of the links in the original post that you responded to, removed as illegitimate?
Because if not, what is your point?

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t What I'm getting from this And the other article you posted, is that the lancet needs to look at their peer review process. What point were you trying to make?

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t But you do cite studies from there yourself, yes? So are you a hypocrite or just an opportunistic cherry picker? Because it appears that you are trying to downplay the legitimacy of this scientific practice or perhaps..... you're just critical of the scientists.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t That looks like a preprint. Not peer-reviewed . Unlikely that it was ever on ncbi but feel free to prove me wrong.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t It's a library of peer-reviewed and published studies. Do you seriously mean to question the quality?

[Biz @BizMac88]

@lsferguson @MissBeck12 @JagicMan Clearly you are profiling your fellow shoppers. Using what criteria? ........ Or do you just look over their shoulder when they're paying?
That's a two-way street, Junior.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@shelbytweten @lonzosburner How many years did cousins get to prove he "couldn't win a playoff game"?

[Biz @BizMac88]

@thevivafrei @fordnation Misrepresented? Not even a little. But for sure point your finger at the cost as a distraction from the truth. They buy it every time.

https://t.co/YJosKWTKfc

And just in case you find reading the transcript challenging 👇

https://t.co/El8eOlhGUb

[Biz @BizMac88]

@thorku I blame free agency.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@rthrash3 @SecKennedy For anyone who read this far....
" The gold standard" that was mentioned by the other guy are randomized controlled trials or RCTs.
There were no RCTs done on pregnant women or infants using acetaminophen prior to FDA approval...... Likely for ethical reasons.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@rthrash3 @SecKennedy You didn't answer my question about the scientific relevance of the peer review process while bashing scientists who have successfully published using that exact process.
Your reactive "context" is mixed messaging.
And yet.....
You accuse me of being the biased one. Okay.

[Robert F. Kennedy Jr @RobertKennedyJr]

The Bobby Kennedy video Meta doesn’t want you to see, narrated by Woody Harrelson.

[Biz @BizMac88]

@rthrash3 @SecKennedy So researchers with poor histories successfully get through peer-review and published....Or is it just THESE researchers?
And..
What exactly are you saying about the scientific significance of the peer-review process?
The difference between us is I've read the paper, you didn't.