Zaid Munir

RWA tokenization. Infrastructure, compliance, execution.
Founder, Scytalelabs. CTO, Immersifi.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The move toward a 130T equity market on chain is the ultimate test for financial infrastructure. While stablecoins proved the tech works for payments, the real shift is in the programmable settlement of these equities. Moving from legacy paper trails to an atomic settlement layer is where the structural alpha lives for both issuers and investors.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

Using WhatsApp for patient data in KSA?

That's a PDPL violation waiting to happen.

No data localization. No audit trail. No processor agreement. Meta's servers are outside the Kingdom and you have zero control over what sits there.

"Your appointment is at 10am" → fine.

Lab results, prescriptions, diagnoses → build a proper stack.

[Nury Vittachi @NuryVittachi]

REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw.

And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices.

.

The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative.

One:
A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran.

Two:
The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans.

Three:
During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators.

Four:
Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv.

.

IT WORKED. AT FIRST

And you know what?

Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down.

.
ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN
The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO]

They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue.

This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down.

But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza.

This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group.

.

TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS

Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted.

So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway.

But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?)

.

THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS

And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government.

Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years.

.

FOUR: THE PUPPET
The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings.

The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians.

But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified.

.

FATAL FLAW
Now here’s where the fatal error showed up.

Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year.

Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack.

No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically.

Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true.

The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed.

.

IRANIANS UNITED
Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen.

So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief.

And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true.

Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on.

So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head.

.

IF YOU SHOOT THE KING…
Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead.

For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.”

What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran.

So now they are in trouble.

And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The transition from institutional-only access to a truly democratized on-chain portfolio is more than just fractionalization. It is about building a unified settlement layer where Private Equity and Treasuries can be traded with the same liquidity as public markets. Scaling this globally means moving beyond the 'wrapper' and solving for true cross-border compliance at the protocol level.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The real value proposition is moving from T+2 settlement to atomic settlement. Tokenization isn't just about a digital wrapper; it is about replacing legacy reconciliation with a single source of truth on-chain. When the asset and the payment move as one unit of logic, you don't just speed up finance, you fundamentally re-engineer the cost of trust.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The shift from the editor being the 'center' to becoming just another 'surface' for agents is the real architectural breakthrough. When agents start interacting directly with design operations rather than just mimicking human clicks, we move from AI-assisted tools to true autonomous production. The next phase is definitely about building software that is 'agent-readable' from the ground up.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The 'doing our best' mindset is a death trap in the agentic era. The real moat isn't just adding an AI wrapper; it's re-engineering the entire core to be agent-native. Moving the top talent into a 'war room' to build the #1 agent in the space is the only way to move from legacy SaaS to an autonomous action layer before the window closes.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The real growth alpha isn't in public case studies but in reverse engineering the early friction points others solved quietly. Analyzing legacy landing pages and previous outreach patterns on https://t.co/fWy8ol9xZL reveals the actual product-market fit journey that usually gets polished away in the final marketing version. That is where the repeatable strategy lives.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

Moving from UI-first to API-as-the-core-action-layer is the only way to enable true agentic workflows. If an agent can’t programmatically handle its own account management and resource allocation, it’s just a glorified script. The real infrastructure challenge is building the security and scoped access controls that allow these agents to operate autonomously without compromising system integrity.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The $300B in stablecoins is just the liquidity base. The real institutional breakout is the jump in Tokenized Treasuries and Stocks. It proves that the market is moving past simple value transfer toward complex onchain asset servicing. The next 12 months will be all about who builds the most robust settlement layer to handle this trillion dollar migration.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The move from simple yield bearing stables to actual global securities like NVDA and QQQ on Binance is the infrastructure shift the industry has been waiting for. The real moat here isn't just the liquidity access but the underlying settlement layer that handles these cross border securities without friction. Seeing this expand to millions of users is a massive validation for the RWA space.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

Coding is a solved problem. Knowing what to solve isn't!

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

Surpassing 5B in bridge volume is a massive validation for institutional RWA liquidity on chain. The next phase of this growth will depend on how efficiently the settlement layer handles complex multi jurisdictional compliance. At Scytalelabs we are seeing that building native deterministic guardrails into the bridge architecture is the only way to satisfy institutional asset managers who need programmatic assurance alongside capital efficiency.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The shift toward ERC-4626 vaults as the distribution infrastructure for RWAs is a game changer for on-chain capital efficiency. However the real scaling challenge in the GCC is ensuring these allocation layers natively support Sharia compliant profit distribution models. We are seeing that when deterministic rules are baked into the vault logic it significantly lowers the trust barrier for institutional asset managers entering the space.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The transition from stablecoins to on chain securities is fundamentally about moving from simple value transfer to complex automated asset servicing. Copying a tagline is easy but building the infrastructure that handles deterministic profit distribution and regulatory gating at the smart contract level is the real challenge. In markets like the GCC where we are implementing these frameworks the moat is always the underlying architecture that can satisfy both SAMA and global standards without human friction.

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

4/ The founders who win the next decade:

Won't ship the best UI. Won't raise the most capital.

Won't have the slickest demo.

They'll build control planes that agents operate but can't corrupt.

Boring? Maybe. Defensible? Absolutely.
#SaaSpocalypse #GCC #FinTech #ai

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

The $800B software selloff isn't AI "disrupting" anything.
It's the market finally pricing in what builders knew 2 years ago:
Dashboards aren't products. Seat-based pricing is a tax on inefficiency. "Enterprise UX" was always a cope.
Agents just made the obituary official.
🧵

[Zaid Munir @BlockchainZaid]

3/ Hot take:

Regulated markets are now the best place to build software.

CMA, SAMA, Sharia compliance frameworks — everyone calls them "friction."

I call them the last moat in enterprise software.

That's why I'm building in GCC while everyone else fights over AI wrappers.