@PGE4Me is claiming its latest rate case filing "stabilizes bills" and "lowers costs." But it doesn't include billions of dollars in (expected) costs to underground powerlines from 2028-2030.
https://t.co/0fyPqweNNO
@MichaelWWara I think it would shock most people to find out California does not have a statewide plan or tools to compare mitigations and comprehensively tackle wildfire risk. Hope they revive it.
California did prescribed burns- the best way to reduce wf consequence- on around 78,000 acres of land in 2023. There are 33 million forest acres in CA + millions brush. How do we get to 1 million acres/year? Why doesn’t the state have a comprehensive plan to mitigate risk?
@Ben_Inskeep So far it seems to be NG and coal to power data centers…but don’t all the big players have clean energy commitments/goals? Or are there some that don’t care?
That systemic effect may be the biggest impact from these fires. Recent steps have been stabilizing the FAIR plan population and there have been some very tentative steps back into the California market form admitted lines carriers. This will complicate things.
@JesseJenkins The initial 1.3 GW of storage was largely BTM, included massive subsidies, and yet was unseen by CAISO and could not or did not contribute to reliability events. Not a policy to emulate I don’t think.
@cody_a_hill I think the CEC new home Solar mandate is driving costs up bc they can pay the housing developer and have an effective monopoly over who the customer chooses. ironic given Solar bashing of monopoly IOUs. This is a theory based on anecdotal evidence would love to see a study!
@JesseJenkins@RL_Miller@AhmadFaruqui@ASM_Irwin Facts like this don’t seem to go down well in this debate. I think this is in part because IOUs and the PUC have wronged ratepayers in so many unreasonable ways, even when they are telling the truth nobody believes them.
Are you interested in learning about the maturity of wildfire mitigation across western United States electric utilities? Come to our webinar on May 7 from 12 to 1 where our legal fellow, Eric Macomber will present his new work:
https://t.co/DdHUpqKVWr
@JesseJenkins Or de couple rate design from solar compensation altogether (buy all sell all). nem 3 certainly took a step in the direction you’re advocating for though.
Yikes. “Interim rate relief” means approving costs that have not been deemed just and reasonable and having ratepayers pay them, subject to refund. Not sure how it’s legal frankly. https://t.co/2iDeGKZOFW