@Handre I also used to hate my government for high taxes.
But lately I hate them even more for importing gazillion of immigrant desperados and doling them out my hard earned money.
@StefanMolyneux Apparently muslims in the middle east pose such a threat, they have to be bombed.
But a soon as they illegaly arrive to Europe, there is nothing to worry.
@IstrianMario There are at least 250 000 "citizens" in Slovenia.
At least criminals like above should be stripped of citizenship and deported to their home countries.
This is properly insane: quite literally the worst example of censorship I've ever heard of anywhere.
I checked the actual ruling (which you can see here: https://t.co/dBKFWZ2ZWm) and, to be clear, it isn't just censorship in the conventional sense - blocking access to a website or removing content from platforms - this is the criminalization of information relayed by private citizens, with prison sentences attached.
And the most insane aspect if that it does NOT matter if the information relayed is accurate or not. It just matters that it originates from RT or other media outlets banned in the EU.
In other words, truth isn't a defense anymore in the EU, it literally doesn't matter. It's purely based on the identity of the speaker.
The ruling is actually explicit about this: the regulation, quoted by the Court says that the prohibition applies to "any content," and they draw no distinction based on what the content actually says. If it originates from banned outlets, it's banned.
It is, quite simply, a complete unraveling of the entire post-Enlightenment legal and philosophical project where entire generations of Europeans fought to move from "who says it" to "is it true" as the operative question.
Think about the absurdity of it: if RT publishes a video saying the sky is blue and you share it on a publicly accessible website in the EU, you'd fall within the scope of this ruling, making you liable to criminal prosecution.
Completely and utterly absurd. But that's the EU today for you 🤷
@Kristjan17971 Sramota za vse, ki kot papige ponavljajo to maloumno propagando.
Še otrokom je jasno, da so ga nagnali zaradi nasprotovanja masovni imigraciji in VDL.
Očitno je, da ni problem, da bi delal premalo, ampak je moteče, da delam veliko in dosegam uspehe. To med drugim potrjuje dvojna pozitivna ocena, ki sem jo za svoje delo prejel od Elona Muska. Če te najbogatejši človek in drugi najbolj vplivni človek zahodnega sveta prepozna in tudi javno naslovi osebno, z imenom in priimkom med 720 drugimi v Evropskem parlamentu, je to očiten dokaz, da delaš ogromno, zelo dobro in da dosegaš izjemne uspehe.
Iz v medijih objavljenega predloga je očitno, da mi v resnici očitajo:
- da ne podpiram LGBT+ indoktrinacije otrok.
- da zagovarjam varnost žensk, otrok in sploh vseh državljanov članic Evropske unije in zahtevam remigracijo in torej deportacijo ilegalnih migrantov (ki jih tu ob spoštovanju vseh zakonov, vključno z zakonom o meji, tu sploh nikoli ne bi smelo biti) in s tem dosledno spoštovanje pravne države.
- da zahtevam konec norosti lažnega "zelenega prehoda, odstranitev birokratskih ovir, znižanje davkov in sprostitev razvojnega potenciala podjetnikov Slovenije in Evrope.
- da zagovarjam sodelovanje vseh političnih sil na desni brez izključevanja.
- da nasprotujem zlorabam EU institucij za centralizacijo in politično obračunavanje ter zagovarjam ustavno pravno dosledno suverenost držav in pravico institucij EU, da urejajo samo in zgolj tisto, za kar so izrecno pooblaščene s temeljnimi akti EU.
- da dosledno branim temeljno človekovo pravico svobodo govora in nasprotujem vsaki obliki cenzure.
Prav to pa so vrednote, na osnovi katerih so me volivci s preferenčnimi izvolili v Evropski parlament. Preganjajo me očitno torej zato, ker sem ostal brezpogojno zvest predvolilnim obljubam, zvest svojim volivcem in tem vrednotam ter Sloveniji. Toda zanje - za vse Vas! - in za Slovenijo se bom boril še naprej! 🇸🇮