None of the information posted or repeated on this account is known by its author to be false, nor intended to stir racial or any hatred of, nor cause psychological or physical harm to, any person or group of people (howsoever identified)
One of the biggest customs of the Maori in New Zealand was to conduct raids to capture prisoners to “chop them up and eat them and turn them into excrement”. They would send the excrement to other tribes and tell them how they turned one of their members into excrement.
“Cannibalism lasted for several hundred years until the 1830s” when whites stopped them. Infanticide for the purpose of eating babies “was also widely practiced” with babies fed to warrior to make them stronger.
“Mothers often killed their female daughters by smothering them or pushing a finger through the soft tissue of the skull to kill them immediately”. The baby girls were then handed over to warriors to feast upon before battle.
War was mainly aimed at capturing prisoners to “chop them up and eat them and turn them into excrement”. Academics are covering up this demonic cannibalism but “the amount of evidence is so overwhelming it would be unfair to pretend it didn’t happen.”
Yet, in New Zealand whites are taught that to talk about Maori cannibalism is racist. The are being encouraged instead to adopt the Maori "Haki" dance as the main cultural symbol of NZ.
A simple comment I made two days ago in a post about Maori cannibalism has already garnered 270,000 views and 110 comments. https://t.co/W7Id7S8XCp
The evidence about Maori cannibalism is now indisputable, including the practices I quoted above:
1. https://t.co/GAVyToxZiw
2. There is whole book about this: Horrid Practice: The Myth and Reality of Traditional Maori Cannibalism (2008), by New Zealand historian Paul Moon. Wiki has an article about it: https://t.co/zdY6yfeJbJ
We have heard enough of the police's lies, now let me tell you what really happened because the people have a right to know:
My friend Mark and I decided to carry a sign saying "Hamas is a terrorist" to make sure everyone at this rally knew that the UK has officially designated "Hamas" as a terrorist organization and that supporting them is supporting terrorism.
When the police noticed our presence, they tried to forcefully remove us from in front of the crowd. They first dragged Mark away and then tried to push me to the side. As I tried to keep the banner held high, a supporter of Hamas snatched it from my hands and ran away. When I saw the police not reacting, I tried to persuade them to take action to get the banner back. When they retrieved the banner, I tried to raise it again, but the police resisted, which made me angry. The police were hiding the truth from the Hamas supporters to avoid making them angry!
When the police saw that I was trying to retrieve the banner, they tried to put handcuffs on me without announcing that I was under arrest. I resisted because I was not under arrest and kept asking for a reason for the handcuffs. They still did not provide any reason, and I did not allow them to handcuff me. Eventually, when the police pinned me to the ground and I was repeatedly struck, an officer said, "You are being arrested for public order." At that moment, while I was in severe pain, I let go of my hands, and they completed the handcuffing process. Then, they took us inside the hotel and kept us behind it for an hour!
There, the officer who arrested me was constantly on the phone, explaining the situation to someone.
He then approached me and added, "You are also under arrest for assaulting a police officer!"
When the police van arrived, they directed us to the back of the van, and we waited about 15 minutes before the vehicle moved. The officer opened the door and said another charge had been added: "You are under arrest for Section 5." As soon as I heard this, I immediately laughed and asked, "Did you see what was written on the banner?" He said, "Yes!" I asked, "Is Hamas not a terrorist organization?!"
He did not answer me, but Mark heard this and began questioning them as well, yet the police gave no response!
We then headed to the police station. When we arrived and were waiting to be booked, the officer, who was still talking on the phone, approached me after his call and said, "You will be released for public order and Section 5, but you are still under arrest for assaulting a police officer!"
This is a clear example of the police fabricating a case against us!
Read, share, and know who you are dealing with!
@metpoliceuk 🤡
The Met Police arrest two men for holding a Union Flag at the pro-Palestine march in London.
The police did not arrest the man who stole their flag.
This is what two-tier policing looks like.
This clip of @DouglasKMurray on @PiersUncensored
has been circulating online, and I imagine many of you
have seen it by now (if not, it’s worth watching).
For this reason, I won’t address his comments directly,
but rather focus on a hidden meaning within his words
that many seem to overlook.
Douglas begins by stating that you can’t hold the leader
of a democratic nation to the same standards as the
leaders of a terrorist organization.
And here lies a critical insight that needs to be brought
to light.
Many in the West view events in the Middle East through
their own lens—shaped by their values and beliefs,
which are rooted in one basic principle:
LOGIC.
In their minds, it seems logical that a person would want
to live a good and peaceful life.
It seems logical that they’d want their family and
children to have a better present and future.
It seems logical that a country would strive to improve
the lives of its citizens.
It seems logical to want to live and let live.
But that’s a mistake.
_______________________
You can’t analyze the Middle East through a Western
lens. But many still refuse to accept this.
They don’t want what you in the West think people
want.
You shout “Free Palestine” because it seems logical to
you that this is what the Palestinians want.
But they were already free—Israel withdrew, and along
with the rest of the world, provided resources they could
have taken advantage of.
They had democratic elections. And what did they
choose?
They chose an extremist Islamist organization that
believes in a global Islamic caliphate.
They chose not to be democratic. They chose not to
choose anymore.
They chose not to be free.
_________________
Now, because you refuse to understand this, we witness
all sorts of bizarre phenomena, like “Queers for
Palestine”—since, to them, it seems logical that a
marginalized group would support another group they
perceive as oppressed.
Naturally, they assume both sides support each other’s rights and goals.
We’ve also seen other figures claiming that all the
Palestinians want is to live in a free and democratic
state, "just like we have in the U.S." (remember that?).
“Just give them their own state, and they’ll leave you
alone.”
This sounds logical for someone who wants to live their
life and let others live theirs—but it doesn’t align with
the logic of the Middle East.
By the way, this is also why many in the West refuse or
struggle to understand that a significant number of
immigrants from the Middle East didn’t come to
integrate.
“I’ll let them live their lives, and they’ll let me
live mine,” they think. But that’s not the reality. Many
didn’t come to integrate, and they didn’t come to let you
continue living your lives as before.
(Of course, many did—many Muslims do want to live that way—but they aren’t the dominant group. They fear radical Islam more than anyone else, so you also need to look out for them.)
The day you understand this will be the day you
understand why they encourage their children to die,
why they raise them to die, and why they rejoice in their
deaths.
No Western person can truly comprehend this—
but that’s the reality.
You’ll understand why, in Gaza, there isn’t a single
civilian bomb shelter—not one!—despite it being a war-
torn area and despite receiving billions for civilian
infrastructure and fortifications.
(In Israel, for example—despite having the world’s most
advanced missile defense technology— there is still a
law requiring a protected room in every new home,
and public shelters near unprotected buildings are
regularly maintained.)
You’ll understand why civilians are deliberately left
vulnerable, and why they actually want to see as many
of their own civilians killed as possible.
____________________
The day you understand this, you might realize that this
is not just a local conflict, but a clash of cultures—one
that believes in compromise and coexistence,
while the other sees compromise as out of the question, with only one solution: the destruction of one of them.
@ThatAlexWoman He is a tool. A tool of the NWO. He does not care about the people of the UK in the slightest. He’s already demonstrated this with the winter payment withdrawal. Despicable human being.
All those times you suspected the @ukhomeoffice had been infiltrated by Dodgy Cousins and finally here’s the proof !
A Home Office worker at the centre of a £6m conspiracy allowing hundreds of illegal immigrants to stay in the country was jailed for 11 years.
•Shamsu Iqbal, 61, was the lynchpin of a scam that falsified at least 437 records
•Iqbal and three other men netted £6million after he 'exploited' a trusted position
•Taxpayer could have lost £56million from illegal immigrants claiming benefits
•Iqbal was jailed for 11 years and his three conspirators a for a total of 20 years
@POTUS Let’s be clear:
You’re not posting these.
You cannot remember what day of the week it is.
Your predecessor is likely to be the incumbent.
Oh, and you lie. A lot.
Superb! @Nigel_Farage clinically dismantles our utterly ludicrous Net Zero targets.
Nick Robinson can't challenge him because he knows Farage is right, resorting instead to childish and irrelevant responses, which backfire spectacularly. 🔥
A few points…
1. ‘Through the back door…’?
I think you’ll find they’ve been quite clear from the get go on this matter. Hence the name LGB Alliance. They’d have been absolutely NO NEED for them, had you not decided to wage an extremely aggressive, abusive gender-based war against us 10 years ago. Shhht. We have the receipts….
2. ‘So called’?
Whom do you think they speak for? Antelope? Biscuits…? Who?
3. ‘Drop the B…’?
Wouldn’t happen. Why? They’re same-sex attracted. Ping! Next?
What’s baffling to is why this & many other accounts like it, are so DEDICATED to preventing same-sex attracted people from having ANYTHING pertaining to their needs, & are so seemingly distraught at the idea that we might want the right to self-assembly & win back our spaces, that they are actually PRETENDING they care, after spending years actively denigrating us & making sure we understood that we’re not wanted.
One would have thought they’d be whooping with delight at this news… perhaps they now realise that attempting to force, silence & abuse those of us who had legitimate & important questions, was a severe tactical error…?
(I did say ‘perhaps’……)
Another case of ‘if we can’t have it, we’ll make darn sure you can’t either…’
In 1968, Sidney Poitier was at a press conference at the height of his career.
He made it very clear how he felt about the press.
Funny that I had to find this on a discarded film reel with 1000s of books, Microfiche and films.
Now you can see it.