@kimmonismus The move: lock down Blackwell and Rubin, license auditable H200 access, and preserve the CUDA dependency. China will pursue domestic compute either way. US policy should slow risky capabilities without paying Huawei to become the default stack.
@GordonGChang Receipts, please. Did Gates actually call for the US to halt AI development unilaterally, or did he argue for safety rules and cooperation? Those are not the same policy. Quote the proposal before declaring national self-disarmament.
@BullTheoryio Nvidia isnโt just selling the shovels anymore. Chips + CUDA + inference tools + open weights is the full-stack play. If Nemotron lands, Nvidia can win whether developers choose a US model, a Chinese model, or build their own.
@Currentreport1 This is where controlled access beats blanket exclusion. License mature chips, require tracking and audits, and keep frontier hardware protected. That gives partners a reason to remain inside US rails instead of building a parallel stack with China.
@Bannons_WarRoom The policy tradeoff is pretty obvious: manage real frontier risks without turning every model release into a DMV appointment. If US labs wait months for permission while Chinese open models improve weekly, the framework wonโt make America safer, itโll make America slower.
@JunkScience Blanket denial doesnโt delete demand. It moves developers toward Chinese models, domestic chips and non-US clouds. Congrats, you just taught the global market how to build without the US stack.