Let's bring in Peter Walton

Parody of Peter Walton's insight on football decisions Referees are almost always correct. If they weren't, they wouldn't be referees.

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

#rules or #laws #TikTok https://t.co/yJsJxV1jQz

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@dheller91 I’m not sure what would be more embarrassing: Bayern Munich doing this or someone pretending this actually happened

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@palacecarl ‘Real image’ - you mean a frame that is less accurate than the technology for semi-automated offside

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@sporanzo @Rory_Talks_Ball You’re getting into the advanced stuff now. Let’s wait until they pass lesson 1.

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@DaleJohnsonBBC @junglejimk It’s absolutely astounding that people need to be reminded of this every game week.

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@Abo_zalah @xKGx__ Even if it wasn’t, never a penalty 🤷‍♂️

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@EPLBible Cannot be offside from the corner itself so unless you think it’s a foul initially or he is interfering after Van Dijk headers the ball, it’s a goal

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@AdamFulwell_ Very similar to Diogo Jota versus Spurs years ago, also not given as a penalty. The reason given was attacker slowed down to initiate contact (rather than the obvious taking a shot). Bad decision again here but par for the course with Premier League refs.

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@AnythingLFC_ I heard the commentators say that but on replay it seems to hit his body first which is why I think it wasn’t given. I still think arm out like that is a pen 🤷‍♂️

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@louorns I would question how the ball moved forward when hitting his side like that without touching his arm but it isn’t certain it hits his arm so onfield decision does and should stand.

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@LfcShaunjudge Realistically, you should block anyone who uses hate for engagement. Different opinions are fine but this is obvious and shameful rage-bait

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@_DarraghLFC @seannhickey If you get into an argument at work about Liverpool, then you start abusing them and following them around the office until you get suspended, did you get suspended for being a Liverpool fan?

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@EPLBible Now do Michael Oliver and Man City

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@DaleJohnsonBBC @LT_34 Makes sense and is correct IMO.
What confused matters last night was the commentary team said Haaland was interfering with the goalkeeper. Was that a misunderstanding on their part?

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@lfc_lance Juan Sebastian Veron

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@gunnerking_14 What about people who criticised Haaland at the time and also thought he should have gotten a yellow here, then another after running into Gabriel from kick off? Can we say Martinelli is also wrong?

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@AdamClery Ignore Neville.

It isn’t a penalty only because it hits his chest first.

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@bazza080808 Yes it looks a little soft but there are 2 crucial details.

1. As you mention not looking at the ball
2. The ball ends up the area it took place which means the holding was impactful

Personally think more of these should be given

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@TheVillaHome It is actually a foul by the attacker. Pretty sure onfield ref gave nothing and Var cleared this as not a penalty very quickly.

[Let's bring in Peter Walton @BringInPeterWal]

@NoContextEPL Really clutching at straws here. QPR down to 10 and you can see City ready to sprint forward and press. Ball is booted to the corner to waste time, it’s not rocket science.