Bruna_LS

Hola soy de fc @FC_LSnuestroamr

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

@Ronn1e45 @NYSMarkets @QtFunded @fundingpips @FundedNext you have to work hard more, study their FAQ before saying this XD

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

@prop_psyop @3xBoogeyman If you have an actual issue with her claims, address the facts and timeline. Personal attacks and assumptions about her motives don’t make the argument stronger.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

@SunilThakor_07 @propfirmeye @FundedNext how? they reviwed and told him where is ruined things!!

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

@prop_shield @FundedNext Oh god that's not a payout!! why are you guys misleading this situation?

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

@SunilThakor_07 @PropFirmsGuru @FundedNext Bro this is so funny nothing changes the fact that he broke a rule why are we not focusing on that

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

Your first goal as a trader shouldn't be:

"Make $10,000."

It should be:

"Become extremely difficult to blow up."

Survive long enough.

Learn.

Collect data.

Build consistency.

Money becomes easier to pursue when survival isn't constantly at risk.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

Your P&L can make you hallucinate.

+0.5R feels like:

"Take it!"

-0.5R feels like:

"Get out!"

+2R feels like:

"Maybe more."

Trade the setup.

Not the number flashing green or red.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

The fastest way to improve:

Stop studying 50 strategies.

Pick one.

Collect 100+ examples.

Track:

Entry

Context

Stop

Target

MAE

MFE

Outcome

Then find patterns.

Data will teach you more than another YouTube strategy video.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

One of the biggest lies in trading:

"I would've made 8R if I held."

Would you?

You only know that after seeing the chart.

At the time, you had uncertainty, volatility and incomplete information.

Judge decisions by process.

Not hindsight.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

There's no prize for taking the earliest entry.

You can wait for confirmation.

Pay a little more.

Get less theoretical RR.

And potentially reduce uncertainty.

Perfect entry ≠ best trade.

Repeatable execution > screenshot-worthy entry.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

You don't have a discipline problem.

You have a rules problem.

"Don't overtrade" is not a rule.

"Maximum 3 trades per session" is.

"Don't revenge trade" is not a rule.

"After 2 consecutive losses, stop for the session" is.

Make discipline mechanical.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

Your strategy isn't broken because you took 5 losses.

A losing streak is part of the distribution.

The real question:

Did you follow the system?

If yes, keep executing.

If no, fix the process.

Stop changing strategies every time the market hurts your feelings.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

@R9trade @FundedNext The setup being valid has nothing to do with execution mechanics. Check the actual Bid/Ask tick data, spread at the timestamp, and your broker’s execution report before calling it manipulation.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

@VClouette If you mention flex no one is currently better than fn flex both price and pt makes it a easy go to option.

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 $11,000 PAYOUT DENIED — @AlphaCapitalUK

According to the trader @thxofx -

Alpha Capital denied an $11,000 payout and permanently banned his accounts after claiming its CID/device system linked 3 devices to another user, “Leo.”

He’s a proven profitable trader with multiple FTMO payouts and maximum allocation there.

He chose Alpha to give the firm a chance, yet his first experience ended with a denied payout and a CID-based ban.

If this was a system error or a genuine rule violation, Alpha should provide clear evidence—not just a claim.

But the key question remains:

Where is the evidence?

The trader says Alpha has not alleged that Leo placed, copied, amended, or closed any trades on the account—and that requests for timestamps, IPs, session logs and technical evidence have received no substantive response.

There’s more: the trader says he had generated around $2,000 in account sales through Alpha’s affiliate code, with an expected $200 commission, before the ban.

If a payout is being denied and an account is being permanently banned based on technical links, traders deserve transparent, verifiable evidence—not just an unexplained conclusion.

@AlphaCapitalUK — will you provide the evidence and explain the decision publicly?
@george_kohler

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

Scam alert ⚠️ @Tradeify scam exposed⬇️

This trader completed KYC, paid for about 15 accounts, and only reached a payout stage.

after that Tradeify then demanded a second identity check and went silent.

This is not risk control.
The first KYC was accepted.
The trader was allowed to keep buying challenges and trading.

The extra verification appeared only when a payout was due.
The dashboard now says Identity verification required and You’re being reviewed, with a vague 24-hour notice and no reply from support.

If the documents were insufficient, funding should have been blocked before more fees were taken.

Repeating KYC at withdrawal, then ignoring the trader, turns compliance into a stall.

Evaluation money is collected quickly.
Payouts are delayed with another review screen.

Tradeify needs to state, in writing: why a second KYC was triggered, what is still missing, and when the withdrawal will be processed or formally denied.

Silence after taking fees is not an acceptable process.
@BrettSimba
@TheTrustedProp
@propfirmmatch

[Prop Firm Nation @propfirmnation1]

$2,105 payout on hold — @AlphaCapitalUK, what exactly are the 9 devices?

Trader @NazimFX1 says he previously received multiple payouts from ACG.

Then came the CID/device email.

ACG says his MT5 was accessed from 9 devices linked to 2 other accounts.

He says he only traded his own account and is asking to see what those device links actually show.

The numbers:
• $1,725 payout — approved
• $2,105 payout — under review

Simple question:

If the device data triggered the action, can ACG show the evidence connecting those devices to those accounts?

No assumptions.
No scam claims.
Just the evidence, so people can judge the case for themselves.

@AlphaCapitalUK

Got a payout rejection or hold with receipts? Share the evidence.

[Bruna_LS @Bruna_LS1]

Tell me my mistake🥲

[Mr Gold Official @MrGoldOfficial0]

#XAUUSD #GOLD

Gold trades near $4,272 an ounce on Friday, heading for a weekly drop of over 2% due to a stronger U.S. dollar

Resistance: 4350/ 4340

Support zone 4270-60-50

The next move bullish ….Friday

[Prop Firm Nation @propfirmnation1]

⚠️ Payout dispute involving @GoatFunded

Trader @Yogiii777 requested a payout of $2,431.52, but says the payout was rejected over alleged copy trading.

The trader denies using copy trading. Later, an additional claim about IP-related connections was reportedly raised, yet no evidence or clear explanation has been provided publicly.

What’s even more concerning: the account was reportedly breached after the payout rejection, while the trader says there has been no clear response from the risk team or support.

@GoatFunded — if the payout was rejected for rule violations, please provide the evidence and explain the decision transparently.

@EdwardXLreal @NazGFT

Hope this gets reviewed fairly and resolved soon. 🧾