There is a STUNNINGLY SIGNIFICANT article in @thetimes today by their great Assistant Business Editor @jameshurley that makes reference to banking and derivatives expert Ian Tyler, @johnmcdonnellMP (leader of @appgonifandffs) and @IanByrneMP (leader of the @NowHillsborough campaign in Parliament.)
Why is @jameshurley's article so STUNNINGLY SIGNIFICANT?
Because it explains that City veteran Ian Tyler, one the country's top banking and derivatives experts, alleges that swaps came with undisclosed "hidden credit lines" - essentially large, undisclosed liabilities registered against borrowers that damaged businesses' credit ratings, caused breaches of loan covenants, and in many cases drove companies into insolvency.
You can think of them as being a bit like having a mortgage that you were never told you had - shocking I know, but true.
Ian Tyler states that hidden credit liabilities and their catastrophic consequences to thousands of UK SMEs (whereby as well as many businesses, livelihoods, and homes being lost there have also been suicides) were excluded from the compensation scheme to save banks billions, and that for over a year, he has been trying to get @TheFCA to give straight answers to straight questions about the scandal.
Ian Tyler rightly argues that if @TheFCA gave honest answers it would expose serious flaws in the regulator's position.
The article also goes on to explain that a cross-party group of MPs led by @johnmcdonnellMP is calling for a judge-led inquiry.
To my mind only those that don't want the full truth to get out into the open would prevent an inquiry happening. Otherwise why would they not want one?
The article ends by explaining that the Government (led by @Keir_Starmer at @10DowningStreet) has rejected the request for an inquiry. That rejection was delivered by City Minister @LucyRigby at the conclusion of a debate in @UKParliament that you can watch in full here:
https://t.co/SDVq8FHbIh.
During the debate @IanByrneMP likens this banking misconduct and regulatory failure scandal to the cover ups to do with the @NowHillsborough disaster and the #PostOffice #scandal.
I think he is spot on for doing exactly that because this scandal reeks of exactly the same kind of cover up as Hillsborough, Post Office, Contaminated Blood, Grenfell and so on.
Who thinks the UK Government led by @Keir_Starmer at @10DowningStreet should change his mind and give the victims of this scandal the inquiry they are calling for?
I certainly do, because "sunlight is the best disinfectant" and it seems there is a great deal of disinfecting to be done now that we know as explained in @jameshurley's excellent article THAT @TheFCA HAS EVEN REFUSED TO ANSWER IAN TYLER'S QUESTIONS DIRECTLY WHEN APPROACHED BY @thetimes!
Why is @TheFCA not answering those questions???
The STUNNINGLY SIGNIFICANT article is here: https://t.co/x7Au8RK04G
And there is also an archive version of it that I have found here: https://t.co/9INK7OGUKd
All the MPs who spoke up at/supported the debate about this banking and regulatory failure scandal should be applauded for doing so.
They are:
@johnmcdonnellMP@IanByrneMP@JimShannonMP@NeilForPoole@LibDemDavid@BambosMP@JoeMorrisMP@AndyMcDonaldMP@Steffanaquarone@mpsusanmurray
And I suspect there will be many more MPs speaking up for the victims of similar banking/financial misconduct and catastrophic regulatory failure scandals in future debates.
If you want to understand all about this then watch the debate and read the incredibly informative report by @BankConfidenti1 that you can get to here: https://t.co/AJP9JVk9fD
And thank you for taking time to read my Tweet!
@TransparencyTF@ParlMagazine@johnmcdonnellMP@TheFCA Great work by the APPG and by John McDonnell. City Minister @LucyRigby should digest the report and get the government to take action. If nothing changes we will continue to have more financial scandals costing consumers/savers/investors large losses and damaging UK reputation
This is really shocking. SMEs treated terribly. SMEs do not understand derivatives, they understand their businesses and want loans that have straightforward terms. The FCA is wrong and is colluding with banks to reduce compensation. This has to stop
We are very grateful to @NeilForPoole for contributing so helpfully and impressively to the debate on "Hidden Credit Liabilities and the role of @TheFCA" that took place in Parliament yesterday.
You can watch Neil’s speech here:
https://t.co/uvT7egHURg
You can watch the debate in full here:
https://t.co/spPmqzLxrm
And there is a detailed report about the issues raised by the bank staff whistleblower service @BankConfidenti1 here: https://t.co/AJP9JVk9fD
We are very grateful to @AndyMcDonaldMP for contributing so impressively to the debate on "Hidden Credit Liabilities and the role of @TheFCA" that took place in Parliament yesterday.
You can watch Andy’s speech here: https://t.co/YNA2OsN7wc
You can watch the debate in full here:
https://t.co/spPmqzLxrm
And there is an excellent report about the issues covered in the debate by the bank staff whistleblower service @BankConfidenti1 here: https://t.co/AJP9JVk9fD
Well worth watching these to understand whats wrong with our finance sector. And if you are an SME owner - what to watch out for and how you should avoid any loan which offers anything you don't understand, like derivatives, linked to your loan.
Hi all, if you want to understand what the term "RIPPING SOMEONE'S FACE OFF" means and why it is hyper relevant to the debate in Parliament on Tuesday morning, watch Episode 4 of "Money, Wall Street and Power" which is available for you free to see on You Tube.
Here are some extracts:
"...traders are incentivised to get the deals done even if it's at the customer's expense. It was phrased 'RIPPING SOMEONES FACE OFF that was used on the trading floor to describe when you sold something to a client who didn't understand it and you were able to extract a massive fee because they didn't understand it and the idea was that this was a good thing because what you were doing was making more money for the bank...
...to maximise profits banks want to do business where there is less regulation...
...beginning in the 90s many American banks found London...
...the key risk taking activities were in London - they were outside the purview of American regulators - hundreds of young bankers moved here from Wall Street to pursue careers in derivative trading as the economy boomed...
...teams of investment bankers hit the road; they are called investment bankers but they were effectively salesman - their job is to go out and sell the stuff that bank is creating just in the same way a pharmaceuticals company would have a very large salesforce who go around selling their latest version of whatever the particular drug of the moment is...
...the bankers will find the type of client that doesn't understand the product in order to sell the product that the client shouldn't be buying..."
Episode 4 is available for you here:
https://t.co/TyBIWYVVNG
But if you have time to watch them before 9:30am on Tuesday 14th April, I'd suggest watching all four episodes, particularly episode 1 because it does a great job of explaining the history and development of derivatives and how they were used by banks as 'weaponised opacity' (my phrase); and episode 4 because it explains what was going on in the UK that led banks to want to sell what was in effect financial poison disguised as wine to their business owner customers.
Here they all are in order:
Episode 1: https://t.co/dnHWvhyJSj
Episode 2: https://t.co/QWSac7GwZm
Episode 3: https://t.co/RI3ECaE4bN
Episode 4: https://t.co/TyBIWYVVNG
All in all, this excellent documentary series does a great job of explaining the underlying incentives and regulatory dynamic that has been at play, in particular it helps explain:
1) What banks in the UK did (cheat and steal)
2) Who they did it to (owners of SMEs)
3) Why they did it (money)
Please do watch this remarkably informative and highly relevant documentary series and share what you think.
All the details needed for Tuesday morning's debate in Parliament being led by @johnmcdonnellMP are available for you at Item 1 in this week's Transparency Times, see here: https://t.co/pApan2AO6T
Ahead of Tuesday's groundbreaking debate being led by @johnmcdonnellMP, Chair of @appgonifandffs, there is an excellent opportunity to fully understand the underlying issues at the heart of the scandal that Tuesday's debate on "Hidden Credit Liabilities and the Role of @TheFCA" will help to expose.
Put simply, you should invest the time to properly read the report by @BankConfidenti1 because it provides a highly detailed and very well researched body of evidence that tells you all you need to know about:
1) What the banks did (cheat their business owner customers and then steal from them)
2) Why they did it (money)
3) Who they did to to (SMEs, the backbone of the UK economy)
To my mind, it's completely unsurprising that growth in the UK economy has flatlined for decades, because we have a whole generation of business owners who no longer have the thriving businesses they once owned, and know the banks can't be trusted.
And in many ways, even worse than the conduct of the banks has been the conduct of @TheFCA (and before it the FSA). In short, the conduct regulators have responded to evidence of serious fraud with what could most politely be described as 'wilful blindness' - so much so that all these years later the innocent victims have still not had the justice and redress they deserve.
As a result, many entrepreneurs have lost their livelihoods, businesses, homes, wellbeing and in some particularly sad cases they have even lost the will to live - literally.
If you doubt anything I am stating go ahead and read the @BankConfidenti1 report, it is available for you here: https://t.co/AJP9JVk9fD
Please do invest the time to study that report ahead of the debate on Tuesday 14th January at 9:30AM; be that in person in the public gallery of Westminster Hall (I'll see you there) or through Parliament TV.
Best wishes to all the MPs speaking up for their harmed constituents.
And best wishes too to all who have helped to bring about the debate - it's been a significant step forward toward justice.
The big question now of course is whether the responding Minister (quite possibly @LucyRigby, MP for Northampton North and the Economic Secretary to @hmtreasury) decides to protect the banks and the regulator, or the citizens they have harmed.
For a quick overview of what's at stake watch this: https://t.co/L6OeWDej6R
This is important if you care about any money you invest in the UK through the financial institutions in the UK. How can it take 9+ years for a report to be published. When it finally is published it needs to ge full and unredacted. Otherwise it'll be a cover up
This is very important as hundreds of thousands of savers/investors/consumers inculing me, have lost £millions over the years and the regulator has been asleep and favours the institutions that pay a levy rather than protecting the individuals who have lost money.
This is really important! Hundreds of thousands of consumers have been affected and their pensions and other investments have been massively reduced as a result of decisions by the FCA and others. The FCA looks after the institutions not the consumer - this has to change
It's great to see that OVER A MILLION PEOPLE are interested in the great speech by @johnmcdonnellMP seeking a debate on "Hidden Credit Lines and the Role of @TheFCA." This is clearly a HUGE PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUE. A huge well done to all involved, particularly @stevemiddi1 and his colleagues at @BankConfidenti1. If you want to know why this debate (which thankfully @BobBlackman's @CommonsBBCom approved) is so important see this report, and note the powerful and righteous endorsement by the superb @normanlamb: https://t.co/AJP9JVk9fD. If you want to know about upcoming free-to-attend meetings in @UKParliament and elsewhere (including online) about all this please make contact through https://t.co/cSqXhlcNBl. . To my mind the upcoming debate deserves all the support it can get from inside and outside Parliament. @DaviesofBrixton; @amcarmichaelMP; @BlaenauGwentMP; @LordJohnMann; @JimShannonMP; @labourlewis; @premnsikka
@TransparencyTF@johnmcdonnellMP@TheFCA@stevemiddi1 This is really important! Hundreds of thousands of consumers have been affected and their pensions and other investments have been massively reduced as a result of decisions by the FCA and others. The FCA looks after the institutions not the consumer - this has to change
A Trump supporter was seated next to an older woman on an airplane and he turned to her and said, “Do you want to talk? Flights go quicker if you strike up a conversation with your fellow passenger.”
The old woman, who had just started to read her book, replied to the total stranger:
“What would you want to talk about?”
“Oh, I don’t know,” said the man. “How about how they stole the election in 2020 and Donald Trump should be president.”
“Okay,” she said. “Those could be interesting topics but let me ask you a question first. A horse, a cow, and a deer all eat the same stuff – grass. Yet a deer excretes little pellets, while a cow turns out a flat patty, but a horse produces clumps. Why do you suppose that is?”
The man, visibly surprised by the old woman’s, thinks about it and says, “Hmmm, I have no idea.”
To which the old woman replies, “Do you really feel qualified to discuss politics, when you don’t know shit?”