The idea that large language models aka “AI” can “think” or “create” in any meaningful way was based in a robotic mis-apprehension of the nature of human consciousness, which was powerfully elucidated 40 years ago by thinkers like John Searle. Large language models are machines, and human beings are flesh and blood. Its only 25 year old autists who don’t understand the difference or see how and why it matters.
No, AI doesn’t “think” — and it’s not going to destroy the universe, let alone write a decent rock and roll song or a novel. At the same time, it’s a powerful advance over previous knowledge based tools with amazing applications throughout the sciences and with the capacity to help us rewire everything from the professions to our educational system. The data centers that power these new tools are the equivalent of electrical power plants a century ago.
The impulse to ban these new technologies or bring them under centralized government control is like opposing electricity or demanding that the government hold a monopoly on steel production or radio. It’s at best a dead end, and at a worst a recipe for tyranny.
History, both ancient and recent, has taught us that there is no group of selfless experts in white coats who act in the public interest. COVID was only the latest reminder. As our founders wisely taught us, society is made up of competing interests which should check each other’s claims on power.
No one cares about Dario, his wife, or Sam Altman’s IPO. Its all noise. If they wasted hundreds of billions of dollars on a mechanistic idea of consciousness, they should have read John Searle back in college. That’s not my problem, or your problem, or society’s problem. Its their investors’ problem.
What we should be thinking and talking about now is how to use these powerful new tools to make ourselves and our society freer, healthier and more open to human creativity and protential. Bust up the knowledge monopolies. Make higher education free and available to everyone. Make access to the best legal and medical knowledge equally available to rich and poor alike.
Big social transformations are already afoot. Its time to man up and be Americans, get out of the big cities and their conformist group-think bubbles, and make a new Eden.
@digijordan Zach Bush has a new book out called Biological Elegance which articulates the impossibility of AI ever becoming conscious. The LLM he’s conversing with agrees, and explains exactly why. I encourage you to check it out.
@CorySwan You don’t think Bitcoin has been co-opted and captured by tradfi also? What about the five largest mining pools colluding to ignore node runners last month, without even a counter proposal or rejection offered?
@saylor What is the former CIA head of covert operations doing on your Board, Saylor? Are you just another MIT spook, set up with the task of co-opting and undermining Bitcoin?
@StevenBartlett@saylor Saylor is trying to co-opt Bitcoin for his own benefit. Bitcoin is NOT digital capital, it is digital peer to peer money. Read its original white paper.
@saylor Bitcoin was designed to be p2p money, not digital capital Mr Saylor. If you were really an advocate of Bitcoin, you’d promote individual sovereignty and self-custody, not co-opting it as a rail for your ponzi stock and shitcoins.
@saylor Says the guy who only recently arrived to Bitcoin, and now is trying to engineer and fund his way into changing its fundamentals (money, not digital credit) to his benefit
@saylor Then why was the op-return filter unilaterally removed, without consensus, after being in place for over a decade? Bip-110 just restores what was taken away. Don't fix what was already working.
Excellent article by @SimonDixonTwitt on BIP-110.
"What I am casting a vote for, here and now, is narrower and deliberate: BIP-110 as a mechanism to push back against the capture of Bitcoin Core. That is the ideological vote, and I am casting it."
https://t.co/c2PphGSC7i
Excellent article by @SimonDixonTwitt on BIP-110.
"What I am casting a vote for, here and now, is narrower and deliberate: BIP-110 as a mechanism to push back against the capture of Bitcoin Core. That is the ideological vote, and I am casting it."
https://t.co/c2PphGSC7i