@Blonskr After verifying a production tool from this website with official confirmation that everything was working correctly, I purchased it, and the resulting circuit mining in the verified pool was transferred to the 1% pool with a corresponding 99% reduction in mining volume.
@BruceBlue Agreed. What I don't understand is why a circuit that was created and is being used legitimately, just days after the protocol was launched, someone else bought it and had to throw it away because the problem statement changed.
@zsylxq Price drops and less discussion will be normal. The risk is when the team and KOLs talk a lots but the price keeps falling, people interested in the project will worry that it's just a pump to dump.
@BruceBlue@lk36627246@benson_doge The story you mentioned is an ethical issue. The story about many channels being sold, confirming the standard mining pools, but after buying the channels they couldn't be mined because the task changed, ended up causing much more harm to newcomers.
@Blonskr Hope V2 comes out soon and proves the protocol's value. If Bem has no use yet and the supply keeps increasing every day, no one will jump in to provide liquidity.
@Blonskr 2 weeks doesn't necessarily mean the project's value is high or low either. Also, don't compare Tapeout with BTC, BNB, etc. When Tapeout has enough value, it'll have its own position. If Bem just keeps dropping, then it's just hype to offload holdings.
@Blonskr Focus on development and creating value for Bem and the community. You're right that we shouldn't compare a 2-week project, but 2 weeks doesn't necessarily mean the project's value is high or low either. Also, don't compare Tapeout with BTC, BNB, etc.
@Blonskr You shouldn't share third-party websites without thoroughly checking them. I just bought a circuit board after checking it through this website; everything seemed official and fine, until after the purchase, I couldn't use it because the questions had changed.
@Blonskr@kabuild2025 The circuits that were working after being purchased can't run because of the change in the requirements—can this be fixed or does it have to be wasted?
@Blonskr I bought a circuit on this website, used the official circuit, checked that it was confirmed for official pool mining, but after buying it, it didn't work because the task had changed.
@Blonskr There's a problem where the circuit was activated, but just a few days later the bank made changes, so if you buy it again it won't work anymore, like the 220 unlocking circuits. Is there any guide to fix it?
@Blonskr@zsylxq I have a somewhat closer question. The problems have just changed, so a circuit with 1 NAND 9 latch, before solving problem 220, now if I buy it again on the market, will it still work or will it not run 99% of the time anymore?
@Blonskr Day N. Still waiting for you to send over Tappe out, a transistor, or something that doesn't have any practical use yet like the Genesis CPU (like how Hoàng Nhân Huân signed something for Nvidia)