Law abiding Sanatani Hindu; Believer of constitutution.
Lets be respectful as individuals as we engage in discusions and agree to disagree in a healthy manner.
@CaneTigger@eurofounder But the challenge is that restaurants charge the customer a decent sum which for a prudent person will make them believe that wages are included in food price. The issue is greed of the restaurant owner.
@Pitchgoats@TouchmineX While I am a Ronaldo fan and would always be CR7 fan, this is the dumbest post here. Its Argentina v/s Switzerland and if you expected anyone to think CR7 would be there, you need to get some basics correct about the game.
Plus, they get a fraction of a second to make decisions, and do not have the benefit of the vision of whole field as we have on camera. In football or any game as matter of facts, there will be decisions which they will take based on the information they have and the gut feeling. It is easier to judge sitting in loving rooms. Just imagine how many times have you been late by a minute as you misjudged the time taken to travel or how many time you have overcooked/undercooked food as you took decisions based on your thought that it has been cooked. The Norwegians played wonderfully and played wonderfully as one team.
So you mean a USCIS or a US Consulate office identified 90% of the applications were fraudulent and they processed them after knowing the applications are fraudulent. This just seems to be absurd and probably indicates that the employee did not do their job correctly. Or are you telling that the employee identified that 90% of the applications were fraudulent and they were rejected? If it latter, there is no issue in the whole process and the process is working. Or possibly this is entirely a imaginary speculation to create an unnecessary sensation.
Also just to note, 20,000 H1Bs (which is 23.5% of all new H1Bs) awarded by USCIS is for US Master's degree. Your post indicates that a lot of them were fraudulent with fraudulent GMAT/GRE scores and possibly US colleges issuing fraudulent degree.
Somehow none of the facts corroborate your claim.
@UnmaskTheSys This is just someone's speculations. If this was true, they would have already been in Jail with a fast tracked trail for this plotting. And news would not be..they knew...it would have been they are arrested and facing trial tomorrow...
And Norway got a yellow card. And their VAR request denied by the referee. While in Argentina match, they go to VAR after issuing the yellow card to Argentina. While they did the right thing with Argentina, they completely ignored doing the right thing with Norway. What causes these controversies and loss of team morale is selective application of rules when there is an opportunity to rule in the favor of the favourite team. Also my personal opinion was that yellow card for Switzerland leading them to play with 10 players was harsh and the player seemed to lose balance with the contact.
Kind of I see your thoughts here. If I am doing a job for few years and my company is intending to keep me indicates that I am justifying the role. So even if they interview anyone, they would not be able to fill in my shoes during their interview and likely need additional trainings. So they can reject candidates as no one during interview can illustrate being able to do the job as good as me.
@TouchmineX Why do you just try and create a sensation. If there is details, just release them or pass them to relevant authorities for investigation and trial. This is just noise otherwise.
@__ElBicho7 It has nothing to do with the team you are referring to. This is for European fans to be able to watch the match without having to wake up at 2 am.
Reflecting over Football - Neymar called his retirement. Brazil lost as they did not have experience on the field. Had it been Neymar he would most likely never had anyone other than himself or Vini take the 1st penalty. The moment Brazil lost the penalty, the team could see loosing the Morale and Norway's gained some extra confidence. I believe that with Neymar on the field, he could have been a guiding star for the team by bringing his experience to the game.
Coming to Neymar, he had been a terrific player. How he was ignored for a significant part of the game in my personal opinion was unfair to him and to the game. However, this was the result of him being out of form due to his injuries. And he was deemed to be replacable by the team manager. This incident is a stark reminder of realities of life, in your prime everyone wants to stand by you and in your low moments you stand alone to fight for yourself.
While his retirement from the game was not in a manner that he and his fans wanted, but be assured @neymarjr, you have been an inspiration to generations and the world will keep on learning from you for ages to come.
I am not sure if FIFA will do a review. And even if they do, no rule were broken. In areas of judgements and benefit of doubts, the referee has some flexibility. And he used it. I also believe that in such cases Argentina was given 100% benefit and Egypt 0%, but the fact remains, it is within the rules.
However, Egypt could have still won if they played their defenses well. Argentinan goals did not happen via penalties and this also shows that either the Egyptians lost momentum or they just gave up.
@goalsside@lequipe Technically he followed the rule book to the core. While this statement is for sure false, even if true the results would have been that rule book was followed.
Its a different story that judgements for rule book favored Argentina.