@KhalilAndani Actually, the Qur'an claims that its OWN authenticity and Muhammad's authenticity rely on the basis of confirming the existing scriptures; then claiming those scriptures are Corrupted (Aaron didn't make the golden calf).
@Anthony_Nigeria@kkKelechi_ Even a athiest Cosmicskeptic tried to criticize Islam once, and Muhammad hijab hinted at his address, and the cosmicskeptic immediately deleted the criticism video against Islam due to "security".
@Salbahs_@SCApologia he not interested in communicating technical to the people, in the context of what the people know. Yes, he can be scientific and explain all the technical and go over people's heads, but he's at the level of the people to drive a point, knowing what they know
@MysticalBible@eternalbread_ No! God does loves them, but it's people's choice to enter into the love and come into Papa's offered house for peace & safety, away from the dangerous street. Anyone who wants to be outside, He allows free will.
https://t.co/DyY4X7NYM6
As an Ex-Muslim turned Christian apologist, here is how I handle almost every Muslim objection:
Stop playing theological whack-a-mole with Islam. It will be fruitless.
When I debate Muslims, I donโt start with the Trinity.
I'm not starting with original sin.
I'm not starting with "How can God have a Son?"
I start with one question:
Is the Bible the revelation of God, or not?
Because every other debate comes after that.
I believe in the Trinity because the Bible teaches it, I believe in original sin because the Bible teaches it and I believe Jesus is the Son of God because the Bible teaches it.
Muslims believe the same about the Quran. They believe Islam because the Quran tells them to.
That's the real issue that so many Christians miss.
Why spend hours arguing doctrine when the deeper question is: Which book actually comes from God?
If the Bible is historically reliable and divinely inspired, then most objections disappear before they even begin.
You can debate theology forever, but if we're reading from different books with different authorities, we're never getting to the root of the issue.
Settle the Book issue first.
Then the conversation stops being an argument.
It becomes a Bible study.
@AlmahdiWesam because it's a mercy for you to not commit a double standard in debate. That's why we give you the opportunity to first look at the historical accuracy reliability of the Quran first. Then you won't be able to make a mistake of double standard in debate
@IjazTheTrini@AlmahdiWesam because it's a mercy for you to not commit a double standard in debate. That's why we give you the opportunity to first ook at the historical accuracy reliability of the Quran first. Then you won't be able to make a mistake of double standard in debate
@muslimorthodoxy@KhalilAndani It's not about who writes the answer to the question, it's about whether the answer has been fact-checked and accurate to address your question. If an argument has been presented that's solid, please welcome it and rebut it. Use the best research tools and give it your best shot.