Olivia
Online
Cameron Conradie
@CameronConradie
Interested in nutrition and exercise. Engineer turned high school Mathematics teacher.
New Zealand
Joined May 2015
172 Following
152 Followers
4.7K Posts
If you were following my substack, you knew about this years ago.
This is the reason the longest ORF in the Pfizer plasmid is not Spike but an undocumented ORF with closest homology (albeit weak) with Spidroin.
The FDA and the WHO demands all ORFs (even ones you do not understand) be documented and Pfizer and Moderna both failed to comply.
https://t.co/a8nI7aJIcb
NZ COVID VAX ADVISORS WANTED TO USE NUDGE TACTICS TO OVERCOME VAX HESITANCY DESPITE MYOCARDITIS RISK...
At the end of June 2021, the Covid Vaccine Technical Advisory Group met to discuss aspects of the Pfizer mRNA Covid injectable roll out and use in New Zealand.
They were all abuzz about the risk of Myocarditis, especially with the potential looming roll out to the 12 to 15 year olds, the very demographic most at risk of mRNA induced Myocarditis
At this time New Zealanders were still being told nothing about Myocarditis as a risk with the mRNA injectable.
At the end of the meeting, they list "new action items raised during meeting"
In a cluster of items on the topic of Myocarditis after Pfizer vaccine, the task to be performed is:
* REQUEST BEHAVIOURAL INSIGHTS INFORMATION ON VACCINE HESITANCY AMONG UNDER 30 YEAR OLDS
They knew Myocarditis was likely to be a risk for this demographic
They knew this risk would cause vaccine hesitancy in this demographic
They wanted to work out how to counter this hesitancy...in spite of the risk
@winstonpeters @CaseyCostelloMP @SimeonBrownMP
(document in comments)
14 WEEKS INTO PFIZER mRNA NZ ROLL OUT ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS WERE UNPRECEDENTED...
The roll out of the Pfizer mRNA Covid injectable began at the end of February 2021, in New Zealand.
CARM (the adverse event reporting system) usually receives a TOTAL of 5,000 adverse event reports per year....for all doses of all vaccines administered in New Zealand.
On 11th May 2021 (approx 14 weeks into the roll out), the chief Covid Vaccines Technical Advisory Group (CV-TAG) convened, chaired by Ian Town.
Professor Ian Town was not only the Chairperson of this important Covid vaccine advisory group...he was also the Chief Science Advisor to the NZ Ministry of Health.
14 weeks into the roll out of the provisionally approved, novel mRNA/Lipid Nano Particle injectable, the minutes record the following:
Quote:
(speaking of CARM the adverse event reporting system)
"The level of work in unprecedented, usually CARM receives about 5,000 reports a year, but have already received around 2,600 reports since the beginning of the Covid 19 vaccine roll out."
In 14 weeks, for only the Pfizer mRNA, they had received over half the usual annual number of adverse event for ALL doses of ALL vaccines in an entire year, in NZ.
They comment that CARM was already a month behind in processing adverse even reports due to the deluge.
They also discuss that there were already FOUR safety signals:
*thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome
*appendicitis
*herpes zoster
*MYOCARDITIS
ALL THIS WHILE NEW ZEALANDERS WERE TOLD ONLY
"SAFE AND EFFECTIVE"
@winstonpeters @CaseyCostelloMP @SimeonBrownMP
(link to document in comments)
Once again, I had overlooked one critical point.
Did you realize that Example 11 of this BioNTech patent publication, WO2021213924A1, provides an important clue for understanding BioNTech Process 1? [1]
Until now, I had focused too much on the fact that the IVT template used in Process 1 was PCR amplified DNA.
But where did that PCR product come from?
The BioNTech Nature paper reporting the study corresponding to Example 11 states the following regarding BNT162b1 and BNT162b2:
“BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 DNA templates were cloned into a plasmid vector with backbone sequence elements…” [2]
Example 11 of the patent also states that, to generate the RNA synthesis template for BNT162b2, the DNA fragment was cloned into a starting plasmid vector. The BioNTech vector technology cited for this starting plasmid traces the pST lineage back to pCMV Script. [1][3]
pCMV Script contains SV40 derived sequences, which show sequence continuity with the later BNT162b2 plasmid OR134577.1. [4][5]
Combined with the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) documents, the meaning of the transition to Process 2 becomes clearer.
Pfizer, EMA, and TGA consistently describe the transition as a change from a PCR derived DNA template in Process 1 to linearized plasmid DNA in Process 2:
“transition from PCR-amplified DNA template to the use of linearized plasmid DNA…” [6]
“DNA template changed from a PCR template to linearised plasmid DNA…” [7]
“changed from a PCR product (process 1) to a linearised plasmid (process 2)…” [8]
Process 1: source plasmid → PCR amplification → linear PCR derived DNA → IVT
Process 2: production plasmid → bacterial amplification and purification → linearization → linear plasmid derived DNA → IVT
That is, those documents describe not a shift from a plasmid free Process 1 to a plasmid based Process 2, but a change in how the plasmid derived IVT template was generated.
Was the plasmid construct itself changed between Process 1 and Process 2?
No regulatory document identified so far explicitly states that the same source plasmid was used for both processes.
However, none identifies two different BNT162b2 plasmid constructs or describes a construct replacement. If such a replacement occurred, the question is why it was not documented as part of the Process 1 to Process 2 manufacturing change.
The genealogy and sequence evidence further support this interpretation. Example 11 describes the BNT162b2 construct, while OR134577.1 provides the later complete BNT162b2 plasmid sequence. [1][5] The plasmid backbones of both can be traced back to pCMV Script, and Process 1 and Process 2 lie within this developmental continuity. [1][3][5]
This is also relevant to the issue of residual DNA in Process 1. BNT162b2 manufactured using Process 1 was actually administered to humans as clinical trial material. [6][7][8]
If a plasmid was used as the PCR source in Process 1, DNA derived from that source plasmid could have remained through the subsequent manufacturing steps.
The extent to which such DNA, including fragments containing SV40 derived sequences, remained must be evaluated separately from the PCR derived template.
To determine this, we need the complete sequence of the PCR source plasmid used in Process 1, the PCR amplicon boundaries, source plasmid clearance data, and a Process 1 specific residual DNA sequence analysis.
And this brings me to the real question.
Where is the Process 1 PCR source plasmid?
Where is its plasmid map and complete sequence?
How was it characterized, qualified and controlled?
Was the Process 1 PCR source plasmid itself treated as a regulated manufacturing starting material?
If so, how?
If not, why not?
Who to follow
HilaryAnneTaylor
@HilaryAnneTayl1
Kiwi Cantab, ex Auckland & Wellington.
MairiFairi 🧭🏕️🛰️☄️✨ 🪐
@FairiMairi
Why?
Not?
Equality NZ/🖕 Racist Seats🇳🇿
@NoRacistLaws
Stop separatism: NO racist constitution. 'The demand for racism far outstrips the supply'..Larry Elder. The road to hell REALLY WAS paved with good inventions
❌❌❌ BOMBSHELL NEW PAPER ❌❌❌
THIS IS WHY IT TAKES 10 YEARS FOR NEW BIOLOGICALS TO GET APPROVAL FOR MARKET USE.
"LNP injection triggered acute neutrophil accumulation in the lungs, driven by the release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from necrotic muscle cells at the injection site. This mtDNA-mediated signaling activated the TLR9-MyD88 and cGAS-STING pathways ... which facilitated the establishment of a pro-metastatic niche."
@Kevin_McKernan @CanningPharm
This is going to get sticky as NIH received mRNA vaccine royalties and suppressed the cancer risks even after they were alerted to SV40 plasmids being in this vaccine and not disclosed.
They also falsely advertised that the mRNA was natural while having a patent on it which cannot be obtained on natural RNA.
MASSIVE UPSWING IN MYOCARDITIS REPORTS WHEN TEENS BECAME ELIGIBLE FOR PFIZER mRNA IN NZ...
There is a lot of independent media coverage in NZ right now, on the subject of NZ ministers staying silent about the risks of a second dose of Pfizer mRNA, and Myocarditis in our teens.
It all happened way back in 2021 (although many families and their then teens, continue to live with the consequences).
What happened?
The key Covid vaccine technical advisory committee (CV TAG) made it clear to the Vaccine Ministerial Group (Bloomfield, Hipkins, Ardern, and others) that for 12 to 17 year olds there was an increased risk of MYOCARDITIS with the second dose of Pfizer mRNA.
There was discussion about removing the need for a second dose from this age group...but this was never actioned.
Explicit inclusion of a warning about this risk for patients (and their parents) was NOT ACTIONED until December 2021 (after the death of Rory Nairn).
Between the time this warning was issued by the technical advisory group, to Ministers; and the time that an explicit warning was mandated to be given to patients at the time of vaccination....
311,237 Kiwi teens received a SECOND dose of Pfizer mRNA with NO WARNING ABOUT MYOCARDITIS
The graph illustrates reports of DEATH, Myocarditis and Pericarditis to Medsafe, by month...including the period during which second dose Pfizer was administered to our teens (without Informed Consent).
The numerical table displays the same data in numerical form.
Notice the huge upswing in reports of Cardiac harm, when the teens became eligible for the Pfizer mRNA.
All data from Medsafe, and includes all ages (not just teens)
@RCR_NZ @nzdsos @winstonpeters @CaseyCostelloMP @chrishipkins @SimeonBrownMP @chrisluxonmp @dbseymour
IN FIRST MONTH OF PFIZER mRNA ROLL OUT, NZ DRUG REGULATORS KNEW 1223 DEATHS REPORTED TO PFIZER IN FIRST 90 DAYS OF GLOBAL PRODUCT USE...
Today feels like a good day to remind New Zealand that:
*In the first 90 days of (global) Pfizer mRNA Covid injectable (Comirnaty) use....
Pfizer received reports of
1223 DEATHS following administration of the injection
We sent an Official Information Application to the NZ drug regulators Medsafe, asking if Pfizer gave this report to Medsafe upon its completion...approximately one month after the roll out of the Pfizer mRNA in New Zealand.
They responded in the affirmative.
Medsafe had this report less than a month after the roll out of the Pfizer in New Zealand
And YOU were told ONLY
"Safe and Effective"
https://t.co/PVAp1WM9nO?
@winstonpeters @CaseyCostelloMP @chrishipkins @davidseymour @chrisluxonmp
Video: Head of Medsafe Chris James (looking distinctly uncomfortable and unconvinced) and Ashley Bloomfield, announcing the provisional consent and roll out of Pfizer mRNA in NZ Feb 2021
🚨“They lied through their teeth” says US Senator🚨
They claimed the US had the world’s best vaccine safety surveillance. But behind closed doors, the Acting FDA Commissioner warned Fauci it could miss the very injuries patients were reporting.
LINK 👇👇
@SenRonJohnson @RandPaul @RetsefL
@BrianneDressen @SecKennedy @RobSchneider @DowdEdward @React19org @FLSurgeonGen @KimDotcom @newstart_2024
THE MOST SHOCKING POINTS OF THE USA PFIZER mRNA CONTRACT, SIGNED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
1. $1.95 billion, no competitive bidding.
2. Taxpayers waived ALL intellectual property rights.
Pfizer keeps every invention and every piece of data. The government got zero license to the technology it paid
3. TOTAL LEGAL IMMUNITY Pfizer is declared a "Covered Person" under the PREP Act, granting blanket immunity from suit and liability. The government contractually required the product only be used where Pfizer can't be sued.
4. Pfizer has NO PERFORMANCE LIABILITY.
The contract says Pfizer has no liability for failing to get FDA approval on schedule—and no liability for failing to deliver doses on time.
5. THE GOVT CAN'T STOP THE WORK. Section 11.2(b) strips the government of its normal stop-work authority entirely. Once signed, the money flows no matter what.
6. A 500-MILLION DOSE NO BID FOLLOW ON.
A "successful prototype" triggers a non-competitive production contract for up to 500M additional doses "without the use of competitive procedures."
7. The government CAN'T RESELL what it bought. Section 4.0: the government "will not resell any of the deliverables to any third party." Taxpayers paid for it; Pfizer still controls it.
9. No meaningful audit rights. Pfizer's financial records aren't auditable until after funding, and Pfizer can insist on a third-party audit firm of its own choosing.
The bottom line:
ALL THE RISK WAS SOCIALIZED (THE PEOPLE)
ALL THE PROFIT WAS PRIVATIZED (#bigpharma)
The government was contractually barred from stopping it, auditing it, or even licensing what it paid for.
https://t.co/nJruiKoMvo
Screenshot: 10 years confidentiality of actual signed contract
🚨🚨🚨 Breaking #plasmidgate update.
If you haven't seen this conversation you should.
Pfizer not only hid the SV40 elements present in the plasmid used to produce its mRNA vaccine, but it DELIBERATELY chose a plasmid KNOWN to have functional SV40 elements to drive gene expression.
That means:
▶️The EMA lied.
▶️The TGA lied.
▶️Pfizer lied.
The two SV40 cassettes (inserts derived from one of the most carcinogenic viruses known) are in that plasmid because they were DESIGNED to maximise gene expression - going all the way back to 1980.
The problem is that they MUST NOT be used in human biological products because of the risk that when the DNA is "inactivated" (chopped up by DNAases), those elements are free to enter your cells and cause havoc - cell dysregulation with a significant risk of cancer.
They used these plasmids because they could get the most product out of their vats of poo (E Coli), not caring about the impact on the population but about profit vs expenditure.
Not only is that criminal in itself but lying to the EMA that "there were no functional elements" compounded the crime, because it was fraud. The elements are deliberately functional - even though they don't code for a separate protein, because they drive maximal gene expression. Exactly what you don't want in human cells.
The annotations below are from the EMA document submitted by Pfizer in 2020 - knowingly hiding the functional SV40 elements. After multiple warnings from people like @Kevin_McKernan and @DJSpeicher the EMA and TGA "investigated" but then lied about the elements, declaring them non-functional.
All to protect their own interests.
This conversation traces the origins of the plasmid and identifies the dual cassettes of SV40 regulatory sequences that were deliberately chosen to keep in the plasmid.
@BretWeinstein @RWMaloneMD @chrismartenson @JesslovesMJK @P_McCulloughMD @Fynnderella1 @FLSurgeonGen @SenRonJohnson @RandPaul
Here you go @Patent_SUN a BLAST of OR134577. 1 (Pfizer COVID vaccine plasmid) vs NC_001669.1 (SV40 complete genome) shows two intact (100% nt homology) SV40 cassettes
▶️4 hits
▶️2 contiguous plasmid fragments
▶️3 contiguous SV40 fragments
@Kevin_McKernan @DJSpeicher
More sleuthing.
Fragments or microORFs of SV40 T antigen are in the Pfizer vaccine.
Remember all those folks who claimed there is nothing to see here because there is no Tumor Antigen…
They trusted…
Didn’t verify.
@KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry @RetsefL
WHILE NZ MANDATED PREGNANT AND BREASTFEEDING WOMEN TO TAKE THE COVID VAX....PFIZER THEMSELVES WERE MAKING THESE STATEMENTS IN LEGAL CLINICAL TRIAL DOCUMENTS
This is a consent form for participants in a Pfizer trial.
Not the original Phase III 42,000 person trial....a later smaller trial but for the same product. The Pfizer mRNA Covid injection as used in New Zealand.
Note that this consent form was published in December 2021. This was exactly the same time that the New Zealand government instigated Covid vaccine employment MANDATES
No jab. No job
PREGNANT AND BREASTFEEDING WOMEN WERE NOT EXEMPTED FROM THE MANDATE...
Printed by Pfizer in December 2021 -
"the effects of the Covid 19 vaccine on sperm, a pregnancy, a fetus, a nursing child are not known."
"If you are currently pregnant, plan to become pregnant, or are breastfeeding a child, you will not be allowed to join this study.
A second study in children (see page 27) is also extremely concerned about the possibility that one of the vaccinated trial children could become pregnant.
If this inadvertently happened during the trial, the trial doctors want to know....and then track the pregnancy, birth and new baby. (this trial April 2022)
(document link in comments below)
@winstonpeters @CaseyCostelloMP @SimeonBrownMP @chrishipkins
100's OF NZ FAMILIES FACED THIS CHOICE - A HIGH RISK OF DEATH FROM A COVID "VACCINE"....OR LOSING EVERYTHING
I will not sit down and shut up
NOBODY has acknowledged this injustice or apologised
When Employment Mandates were operational for 40% of the NZ employed population... You either had to take 2 doses of a Covid vaccine....or successfully be "medically exempted" from them.... or you LOST YOUR JOB and, some or all of the following:
Your career.
Your money
Your house
Your marriage
Your mental health
Your trust in the Government
READ THESE STATISTICS SLOWLY
*119 people who were injured by a Covid vaccine and developed MYOCARDITIS or PERICARDITIS, applied for a medical exemption.
43 exemptions were granted.
76 injured people were DENIED
*215 people experienced a Serious Adverse Event following the first dose (excluding Myo/Peri) and applied for an exemption.
48 exemptions were granted
167 exemptions were DENIED
*102 people with pre-existing Inflammatory Cardiac Disease applied for an exemption
23 exemptions were granted
79 exemptions were DENIED
*55 people with pre existing Acute Decompensating Heart Failure applied for an exemption
5 exemptions were granted
50 exemptions were DENIED
*55 people with non cardiac pre existing conditions applied for an exemption
9 exemptions were granted
46 were DENIED
Do you understand?
418 NZ (with cardiac issues) families faced the choice of the VERY REAL possibility of DEATH from a Covid vaccine.... Or losing EVERYTHING they had
PS This post pertains ONLY to CARDIAC applications - there were many other applications also declined
PPS we have dealt with several families with the "inadequate information" tag. They all provided everything that was required of them and did not understand why their application was tagged "inadequate information"
NZ OIA Ref: HNZ 00028251
Video Me (Lynda Wharton) testifying to the NZ Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Covid Response (Phase II) July 2025
@simeonbrown @winstonpeters @caseycostello
🔥A young Australian man could be about to make history - globally.
A government legal officer by day.
Lead plaintiff suing the entire Queensland Government by night.
He just built the biggest anti-mandate human rights case on Earth — and the state can’t kill it.
One man.
Thirteen expert witnesses.
Zero government experts.
History in the making.
(link in comments and share the life out of it)
@uTobian @jeffreytucker @brownstoneinst @HighWireTalk @SenatorAntic
THE STATE OF NZ COVID DEATH BY VACCINATION STATUS DATA....ABYSMAL
Health NZ OIA Ref: HNZ00075877
Come on a journey with me to understand what we are up against in NZ, when we try to access Covid related data through Official Information Applications.
This OIA response is NOT a rarity. This is the story of our OIA life.
1. We asked questions pertaining to an official table describing the numbers of Covid deaths in NZ. We asked for the deaths to be broken down in detail, by Covid vaccination status and in the smallest possible age group banding.
We asked specifically for all Covid deaths under the age of 20 to be identified to us by vaccination status including ZERO vaccines; rather than "not fully vaccinated" status (which encompasses both zero and one vaccines)
Problem one:
in the weeks between lodging the OIA and receiving the response, MOH have changed the link to the table and it has disappeared.
OIA RESPONSE... (a paraphrasing)
Health NZ is unable to answer the specific questions as they do not hold the data in the requested form...and it's too much work to get it. We can however give you "similar" data.... We can give you this table....
WHERE WE MIX TOGETHER UNVACCINATED AND ONE DOSE VACCINATED so it is impossible to actually work out how the unvaccinated fared in terms of deaths from Covid.
In this data we only include people in the "fully vaccinated death from Covid" column when they have been DOUBLE VACCINATED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS.
If they tested positive for Covid 6 days (or less) after they have their second vaccine, and then die in the next 28 days, they are categorised as "not fully vaccinated" and mixed into the single dose and UNVACCINATED category....thus increasing the size of the category where the unvaccinated live!
Please note that even though Covid deaths are prioritised for coding, the data for 2020 is considered "provisional" and the data for 2021 - 2023 is "preliminary"
DUE TO THE NUMBER OF OUTSTANDING DEATHS WITH NO KNOWN CAUSE AWAITING CORONIAL FINDINGS and therefore subject to change.
Problem two:
we asked for the narrowest possible age group banding, and also for age 20 and below to be given separately.
Instead we get a table where everyone aged 0 to 59
ARE CONFLATED INTO ONE AGE GROUP CATEGORY
So there we go....right back at square one and absolutely none the wiser how the unvaccinated have fared in terms of number of Covid deaths in New Zealand by age banding and vaccination status.....or any other banding!
NB this was early 2025....but nothing in our OIA journey of frustration has changed since then
@SimeonBrownMP
HOLY CRAP.
I don't use the words "smoking gun" very often, but this...
@SenRonJohnson @RandPaul @SecKennedy @POTUS
@NIHDirector_Jay @DrJBhattacharya @jeffreytucker @brownstoneinst @thevivafrei @EpochTimes @docbiss @MaryBowdenMD @maryhollandnyc @ChildrensHD
🧬SV40 DNA UPDATE
"It was not known or expected that these plasmids would contain the SV40 enhancer."
Newly unredacted Health Canada documents reveal that Pfizer took regulators by surprise.
Info Commissioner ordered substantial unredactions, but HC only partially complied.
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers