I can't buy these companies, but to me they look similar to $CNI and $PAYX in the low nineties.
- $OTIS
- Copart $CPRT
- Intuitive Surgical $ISRG
- $ASR at $280
- $NFLX (most people only like +$100, but $75 will do for me)
- Rollins $ROL
- McCormick $MKC
- $MCD
I mentioned Otis on my profile, so I may be exposing an (earlier) mistake of myself.
My point is that while, at first, I saw some major pluses in the business models of Otis and Kone, I am in doubt now.
On second thought, the threat of independent service providers seems bigger. There seems to be no switching costs for customers.
Give me x amount of money, how much can I hurt them? Well, look at Japanese Elevator Services. They did quite that.
I am not a major fan of booms, which are just another rat race, however in defence of the established (!) companies projected to profit from AI, I would like to humbly note that to me it seems unlikely that just as soon as the infrastructure is set up demand will all of a sudden disappear.
Perhaps I misread the one and the other.
@DvdndDiplomats I still have to reach the point of course, however I believe one's whole perspective, one's whole worldview, might change once the first dollar for which no direct labour had to be performed arrives.
@sidecarcap How should I know, but my perception was that part of buying a stock means believing the price at which one buys the stock is in a right range. In other words, that one is not overpaying.
Why so?
The original post is about the McDonald's Corporation. That's 95% franchisor economics, and just 5% restaurant economics.
I believe what you're talking about is restaurant economics, which is still quite relevant when you consider the fact that franchises must be able to earn a good living, but not when you judge the franchisor.
@kevindmonaghan@Mindset4Money_X Do you mean the costs of operating any individual restaurant?
Why would the McDonald's Corporation report those as their own? They (ought to) do so only for the 5% of total stores they themselves operate.
@long_equity Do you only want the crème de la crème of businesses, or do you just say sugar is sugar.
If the latter is the case, then Cloetta might be a nice addition.
@0xtechquity Costco is the better one, no doubt about it.
However, isn't the weaker revenue growth at Walmart more, or at least partly, a consequence of the law of large numbers?
@DiviDrivenFIRE One interesting observation with the company is, however, that last year's buybacks, when price fell significantly were considerably lower than the years before.
Persoonlijk vind ik de producten van Hermè, maar ook bijvoorbeeld LVMH veel te discretionair. Ik snap niet waar bij deze luxebedrijven de prijszettingsmacht vandaan komt. Status ofzo? Daar heb ik weinig mee.
Van bijvoorbeeld Apple snap ik wel waar die prijszettingsmacht vandaan komt, ondanks dat het ook in een (naar mijn mening) zeer competitieve markt opereert. Bij dat bedrijf dient het merk, wat slechts één onderdeel van de moat is, als een soort middel om mensen in een “fuik” te krijgen. Want zodra je in het eco-systeem zit, willen (en kunnen) de meesten er niet meer uit.
Here in the Netherlands, in secondary school, I have a subject called “business economics”.
Last year we talked about EBITDA I just read a piece from which I can deduce that those composing my textbook don't know, only know dividends as a means of rewarding shareholders.
So here they do “teach” us about “investing” even before university…