@Orville54310141@Big_Blu3_ It's not what you said per say. It's what you are implying. It's what the logical conclusion of your system is
And no, the other team could not have won. But this is because God created a perfect system, not because God determines individual actions
Christianity brainwashed this woman so bad that she …
… quit drugs, quit drinking, stopped self-harming, & stopped having suicidal thoughts.
It’s a cult that tricks you into healing & purpose! 🚨🚨🚨
@Orville54310141@Big_Blu3_ Think of God's omniesce as someone watching a recorded football game
They will know who won, but they did not cause the players to score
@Orville54310141@Big_Blu3_ "In Provisionalism every free will choice is determined beforehand by God’s omniscience"
It's not tho
You are still insisting that knowledge = causation
But that is not a logical or theological requirement and it's not what provisionalists believe
1/2
@Orville54310141@Big_Blu3_ The diference is that in calvinism, God literally made the person not be able to follow Him
In provisionalism, God did not determine that person's choice
In provisionalism, every single person has a chance to choose God. God knowing what the outcome will be does not affect it
@Orville54310141@Big_Blu3_ Because "choice" in reformed theology doesn't actually exist.
The reprobate can ONLY "choose" to reject God
The elect can ONLY "choose" to follow God
These "choices" were made by God himself, not by them
So, from the human perspective, the ability to choose does not exist
@Orville54310141@Big_Blu3_ Why would God command people to do certain actions if he determined that they wouldn't do it in the first place?
Ex: Moses and the rock at Meribah / Saul and the Amalekites
@Orville54310141@Big_Blu3_ Because God is beyond time. He may as well be looking backwards from the future
You are putting human limitations on God
There is no logical or theological reason why onipotence NESCESSARILY means causation