Jean 6:44 Exode 23:2 Genèse 6:5 ✝️ Royaliste - La Cité de Dieu - Collège de Sorbonne
Un catholique qui aime lire de vieux livres de théologie. Ami de la vérité
The funny thing with the followers of Lamennais is that they will call you "pROtEStANt" for refusing arbitrary tyranny and corruption by Curia officials, while they proudly reject the Syllabus of Pius IX, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis by JP II and Paul VI's Humanae Vitae 😂😂😂
@WisdomHasBuilt Very cool, citing an irrelevant Boniface VIII passage to excuse the financial scandals, power abuse and corruption of the Court of Rome.
The Pope isn't the Curia.
I can't emphasize enough how much I dislike the Court of Rome. It did profound damage to my supernatural faith and it has given me a profound crisis of conscience over the years. Without the SSPX I'd have ceased being Catholic long ago.
“More & more Catholics are realizing that Church doctrine no longer serves as the limit to the hierarchy’s actions. This is the illness from which the Church truly suffers”
Mgr Grichting warns that papal actions have “destroyed” trust in the Church
https://t.co/etwKGprGtS
This is dangerous nonsense from David Lammy
Of course everyone should be treated the same, regardless of ethnicity
Presumably he has in mind treating ethnic minorities more leniently
Lammy is seeking to justify racism
@Alice_Mary96@Osarseph0 Poor Thaddeus is the unfortunate casualty of the modern age. He is very attached to exoteric religion to the point where he changes his beliefs three times a year and never finds spiritual rest.
@IncredPapist_ 40/100 you are advocating basic anti-populism and scepticism towards the mob. Slopulist nonsense like chartism is a far left position and no amount of modern delusion will turn it into a respectable position.
@Osarseph0 I think that Rome became very vulnerable to malicious subversion with the fall of the Papal States. The Papal States were in one way a bulwark for orthodox teaching.
No one could force the Pope or his hierarchy into a 180 without invasion. Whereas these days...
@BritanniaKJV@9Kings1910 In my case even Protestant Freemasons of the Swedish Rite could make a pilgrimage to any Christian site without receiving an objection from me. I am quite open minded and moderate by 19th Century standards.
Just don't be a modernist. It's that simple.
@9Kings1910 The extended good will ends however if someone can't profess Quod Ubique, Semper, et Ab Omnibus. Sacred scripture teaches that their very prayers offend God (Proverbs 28:9), and egregious modernists who treat doctrine like a tax policy to be changed are of bad will in general.
@9Kings1910 If Anglo-Catholics of the Anglican Continuum made a pilgrimage to Walsingham no one but the worst reactionary RadTrad would raise his voice against a sign of general piety and good will. As someone with deep Josephinist sensibilities I would welcome it.
@IncredPapist_@manofcomfort@guilaugustin Good sir, allow to point out that until the 1960s there used to be a division between the private and public sphere. In polite society every man of good morals followed this distinction. The liberal crowd ended this distinction against Christian opposition.
@IncredPapist_@JustinusRomanus Speaking of books on ultra niche topics, the only way I can interact with women these days is when I can feel assured that they actually read things. I get very, very, very, very, very bored of having to talk about current events etc
If they are not sophisticated = 😴😴😴
@Osarseph0 If the gentleman in question is convinced of her good will after excluding obvious red flags like political liberalism, then we ought to be supportive of her conversion. She's not resisting his evangelization efforts.