When a prediction market says "60% chance" β does YES actually happen 60% of the time?
I tested this across 113,823 resolved markets on @trylimitless.
The answer blew me away. π§΅
There is a power in making yourself known as the most stupid person in the room, be okay with it, and then ask the questions everyone seems to have already assumed the answer to.
A lot of this has to do with you caring about what others think. If you don't, you are free to ask.
It seems like, with all the AI-spam, the texts get longer and longer to be precise as possible, but I appreciate authentic messages with flaws nowadays.
There is so much complexity in designing governance systems that are trusted.
I read about ZK-STARKs and find it fascinating and see the urgent need to implement it in open source protocols for on-chain governance mechanisms, especially a trusted Futarchy solution.
"The verdict is consistent: token-weighted voting concentrates power, delegation doesn't fully solve it, and fairness requires more than smart contract design."
https://t.co/UcuNvyIP3z
Lets learn and use information markets and a governance layer on top of it.
It's a skill to review the plan output and reject non-necessary suggestions. Instead of the tutorial hell, there is a suggestion hell; a suggestion loop in which one constantly generates and gets exhausted by the sheer amount to review. I started to ignore more LLM suggestions.
AI is unstructured, non-deterministic. The business of the next years is to bring the fuzzy output of AI into multi-step workflows to solve the worlds problems. A imagine solutions to problems using a secret sequence of structured prompts instead of DIY prompt exploration.
Firstly, start with finding a niche.
Secondly, look for problems in search of a solution.
Then write a step-by-step process to solve a problem with multiple Markdown files.
Go deep and describe exactly how you want it.
Lastly, automate all the steps with an agents framework.
Voldemort from Harry Potter knew a lot about dark energy, but had blind spots in other important areas of magic.
Just make sure you don't end up like Voldemort.
Move from idealism to realism by constantly learning through a variety of books outside of your usual path.
AI is fuzzy. It needs continuous feedback about the expected result. Needed is a clear set of rules with weights, trade-offs and nuances, which are again defined by humans in computer code. Code is more reliable and therefore trusted. That's why I think coding will persist.
To really become non-delusional, non-idealistic, grounded in reality is the best way to improve ones life. For this, constantly learning in many areas of life is the only solution. Thankfully, we have AI now to detect lies, misinfo, but even AI could rely on false data fed to it.
I have always viewed blockchain technology as an amazing truth machine. It lets anyone trustlessly and mathematically verify that something took place at some point in time - really remarkable!
This truth machine is even more important with recent improvements in AI, which in some sense is a sort of "anti-truth machine" - LLMs tend to hallucinate, generative AI lets you create anything you can describe, etc.