Co-owner of AWOL | US Vet | Probably lost but in a cool way. Burgers, not meetings. Building platforms, dodging reality checks. DM for adventures, not advice.
@donwinslow@Harvard And then what?
These are seasoned professionals; revoking a degree changes nothing.
If Harvard’s handing them back, maybe it should return the tuition too… with interest.
Empty threats from people who confuse credentials with competence.
@mysticl @ram59161706 @anders_aslund Funny how people who claim the U.S. is irrelevant spend so much time obsessing over it.
Like it or not, the world still runs on American innovation, military power, and economic gravity.
Keep stocking that popcorn, we’ll keep setting the stage.
@PawlowskiMario Sure, they “showed up” today, but where was that leadership over the last 3 years?
Showing up now is easy. Real leadership would’ve meant action when it was risky, not just when the cameras are rolling.
@PerfectOurUnion That’s your choice, and good luck to you.
But if you’re bailing just a few months in, were you really ever that committed?
No president gets it all right, and if you expect to agree with everything, that sounds more like the cult you’re warning about.
@toyperry@L_Toczylowski With all due respect, times have changed. We didn’t have social media mobs and doxxing back then. I served in the military and LEO, and wore a mask when the situation called for it. Safety doesn’t make someone a “renegade.” It’s reality now, not weakness.
@L_Toczylowski Doxxing law enforcement isn’t normal, or acceptable. But neither is masked mob takeovers of campuses or the surge in masked street crime. NYC literally banned masks. Let’s not pretend this is a one-sided issue.
Last week was the best week yet since launch, feedback has been fantastic.
We are about 90% done with the bugs now too
Thank you all for the support.
NOW ON THE APP STORES:
https://t.co/2oTVA5V8J0
“Check a history book” isn’t a plan.
Reagan didn’t just wish oil prices down; he worked with Saudi Arabia, ramped up U.S. production, and leveraged global alliances.
So, unless you’re proposing OPEC manipulation, energy expansion, and multilateral coordination, you’re not referencing Reagan; you’re just name-dropping.
Also, if you “see no strategy,” maybe squint harder:
Threats of walking from talks
Sanctions on holdouts
Redlines on aid
Pressure across both parties
It’s not 4D chess. It’s called leverage.
You don’t like who’s using it.
Interesting logic:
– Putin doesn’t matter
– His replacement will be just as bad
– China’s not a concern
– Iran’s isolated
– And Trump = WW3?
That’s not a strategy. That’s just hand-waving away every real threat while insisting your side holds moral clarity.
If your whole plan depends on oversimplifying global risks and hoping everything falls into place, you’re not avoiding WW3. You’re inviting it, blindfolded.
So:
– Russia’s military is “collapsing.” Explain?
– Its economy is “done.” Rubel is doing pretty well.
– Ukraine is destroying strategic infrastructure. Where and what percentage of the total?
– And nuclear escalation is… “a fiction”?
Then why are we still here?
If Russia’s collapsing and nukes aren’t real threats, why hasn’t this ended?
Because maybe, just maybe, your victory narrative doesn’t match the battlefield.
You’re not describing a strategy.
You’re describing a highlight reel with no context.