Pro-life Case:
1. The unborn are living humans
2. All humans have basic rights
3. Govt is obligated to protect basic rights
4. Abortion violates the rights of the abortion victim
5. Abortion should be illegal
(1/7)
@davidaxelrod As a former Chicagoland resident, I can confidently say, based on the clouds of turkey aroma drifting south into Illinois each year on a particular holiday, Wisconsinite families are unlikely to elect someone who smells like an out-of-touch anti-thanksgiving dorm room activist.
@whignewtons If Justice's opinions must ideologically differ for a case to be "big," it's misleadingly tautological to claim they disagree on big cases. If there were 20 cases that seem big, but the Justices disagree ideologically on 1, that isn't evidence of political bias.
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench would it be constitutional (ignoring precedent) to make an EPA-L (l for legislative to make regs) and EPA-E (e for executive) with two heads, one over reg making (reports to congress), one for executory who reports to POTUS? Can they be the same person?
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench I used to think the summer recess for SCOTUS was dumb, but human nature being what it is, it seems that a break is needed to maintain and refresh a good judicial temperament... which is absolutely vital to good judging.
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench On consequences, messing with the federal reserve risks many lives bc that's the downstream effect of major econ problems. So... I think it's not $$$ vs lives in immigration cases. It's more lives + geo political instability vs less lives.
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench Thomas's criticism of the Sharp decision was sharp. Warren's reasoning is absurd. However, I shutter to consider the consequences
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench It feels like some conservative justices have nostalgia for the past compared to the present, are therefore inclined to adopt THT, and are now, in real time, being forced to face the illusion of the good old days.
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench In proper honor of our former English overlords, might I suggest the donning of powdered white wigs for your podcast discourse on or about this fourth of July?
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench Despite Gorsuch's opinion, the majority wasn't worried about plea bargains (coercive or not), but unjust sentences. They ground it in the judiciary's interest, but the vibe is "that's just wrong!" Thomas is cold-blooded, but not wrong.
@WillyRice The task force is smart. It will perhaps clear up questions like whether the amendment speaks to a woman pastor over children's ministry, VBS, female professor at a seminary, co-leading a small group, sharing a testimony, missionary wife speaking, HR dept roles, etc.
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench I take David's point about homogeneity causing polarization, but wisdom should overcome this. Intellectual humility, seeking the best opposing arguments, evaluating hypos that test the limits of your view, etc. is what polarized (unwise) groups don't do
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench Between men / women, some self-interests and knowledge differ. Studies suggest men take more risk, are less collaborative, are less socially oriented (more abstract, individualistic, competitive). Wisdom should eliminate these differences in opinions.
@whignewtons@DavidAFrench After 2028, if Dems control Congress and the WH, they can ban gerrymandering to solve the alleged racism issue (I won't hold my breath).
Could they do something short of banning gerrymandering that addresses the allegedly racist lines?
@baptist_news Just wait until these journalists read Paul:
1 Corinthians 14:35 ESV
If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.