@Larskooistra_@makotun2@Explorer___51@wozo_capital Loss are good, people expecting rare or no losses are dreaming not trading :), also, if invalidation is tight losses also could potentially be more frequent but tiny.
Net GEX alone is just a passive instrument, you can’t derivate from it what intention the dealers have, they can amplify the move to the upside or downside. Also i dont think you can derive dealers intentions just by looking at the current S&P market structure, their actions are determined by their current profile exposure which can be hedged also between different indexes not just the corresponding underlying asset of the options exposure.
@Larskooistra_ Multiple losses is fine when your stop losses are small meaning the entry is more favorable to the gains, otherwise they’re still bad statistically. But even several small multiples losses after a while starts to impact.
@wozo_capital@timheus Yes but i would be more interested in seeing the red trades, where your system failed not just the green bucks. Do you have something like that to share? 🤔
@RichardMoglen@Deepvue just curious, i mainly see one indian guy as the core developer for @Deepvue but seems too much work for a single guy, do you rely also on contractors for temporary futures requests? 🤔
@benjamincowen@AlphaWolfPRMR That’s fake ben and you know it, that data only reflects a good amount of people relocating to lower tier paying jobs or multiple part time jobs to survive.
@CPNasty_@Larskooistra_@1of1_Acc Do you get your secondary probability setups mainly from other communities members or also from filtering through a screener/scanner?
@DieguitoCharts Are you switching from focusing on a sigle asset like BTC to multiple assets like SPX, ETH etc or you were always trading multiple assets but showing only BTC? 🤔