A collection of papers, articles etc evidencing there is no anthropogenic climate crisis and that many "eco/green" ideas are not all they are cut out to be.
Here's a starting point
Worldwide, 7 times more people die from being too COLD than they do from being too WARM.
So we might reasonably think that maybe the ideal temperature for the Earth is warmer than today..to save the lives of those dying from cold.
So why are we 'fighting' warming?
Billions of solar panels are nearing their end-of-life cycle, and the world is completely unprepared for the coming toxic avalanche.
By 2050, the International Renewable Energy Agency projects up to 78 million metric tons of useless and toxic solar e-waste. Where is it all going to go?
The industry boasts that solar panels are '95% recyclable'. Technically, yes - because they are made of glass, aluminum and copper. But economics always trumps physics. In Australia and the US, it costs roughly $20 to $40 to disassemble and recycle a single panel, but only around $4 to dump it in landfill.
Because there is no financial incentive, up to 90% of decommissioned panels go straight into the ground. There are between 7 and 8 billion solar panels in the world today. This milestone was reached as global solar capacity officially surpassed 2 Terawatts (TW).
Because the physical wattage of individual panels varies from small 300W residential rooftop modules to massive 600W utility-scale panels, 2 TW of total energy capacity translates to roughly 7 billion individual panels currently installed worldwide.
Each solar panel is an industrial 'sandwich' bound tightly by heavy polymers. To extract the microscopic amounts of valuable silver and high-purity silicon requires energy-intensive chemical and thermal baking.
When they are crushed or left to fracture in landfills, heavy metals like lead and cadmium (in thin-film technologies) can leach into the surrounding soil and groundwater, turning 'clean energy' into a multi-generational hazardous waste problem.
The crisis is accelerating faster than models predicted. Because solar cells degrade and lose efficiency, and newer, cheaper panels hit the market, consumers and solar farms are ripping out functional systems at least a decade early to upgrade.
This compressed lifecycle destroys the narrative of a long-term, stable asset and creates an endless loop of unrecyclable industrial trash.
If models cannot reproduce where that heat has actually gone since 1950, their catastrophe outputs deserves far less attention than politicians, activists and media outlets give them.
Full breakdown (& more) in today's Substack: https://t.co/0rUsHqhZH6
Climate Change Consequences:
Sea level is rising at 0.003 metres per year
Please try to persuade me that this is anything more than a minor inconvenience
It is certainly NOT an 'existential threat to humanity'
Your thoughts?
Deforestation has reduced biospheric carbon for centuries - the carbon stored in plants, trees and vegetation.
Climate narratives highlight those losses but ignore CO2 fertilization. As atmospheric CO2 rises, plants grow faster and photosynthesis becomes more efficient.
Satellite data show the result: global vegetation has exploded. By 2020, increased plant growth had offset historic vegetation losses from deforestation. The biosphere moved back into net positive territory.
Rising CO2 boosts plant growth, the biosphere expands as a result, and global greening has now exceeded centuries of deforestation losses.
If CO₂ is the primary driver of heatwaves, why do many U.S. regions show more heatwave days during the Dust Bowl era than today?
Real climate science starts with observations... not narratives.
Dismantling coal, oil, and gas without a viable substitute may be the costliest policy error in human history.
Temperature predictions of a 5-degree rise by 2050 have been withdrawn. Yet, the rush to manufacture and install the equivalent of 1.3 million wind turbines and 7 to 8 billion solar panels over the last forty years has made little difference to global temperatures.
Instead, we're witnessing the results of a severe lack of careful planning and foresight in the mounting e-waste graveyards of aging renewable structures worldwide.
Because these wind and solar networks require full replacement every couple of decades, the additional pressures placed on global mining capacity and manufacturing resources are incalculable.
This furious agenda of tearing up the earth to mine and build has caused genuine environmental degradation. Our once beautiful landscapes, coastal vistas and rural farmlands are being despoiled at an accelerating rate.
Image: The physical footprint: Tonnage and decommissioning realities of wind infrastructure. Source: Sven Loeffler / Getty Images
Australia's official temperature record starts in 1910. Earlier observations are excluded from the BOM series for data quality, but the measurements still exist and they shouldn't be ignored.
A 1953 analysis by climatologist E. L. Deacon examined long records from inland stations.
Using 10-year averages of summer maximum temperatures, the study found extreme heat across Australia in the late 1800s during what's known as the Federation Drought. At the time, carbon dioxide was below 300 parts per million, meaning Australia was recording summer heat comparable to, and sometimes exceeding, modern levels long before modern emissions. And then, from roughly 1910 to 1940, temperatures cooled even as carbon dioxide climbed.
Australia's climate was capable of sustained heat extremes with CO2 levels below 300 parts per million.
This database contains more than 300 peer-reviewed papers that question key pillars of the climate narrative.
The papers cover temperature attribution, solar variability, greenhouse gas physics, ocean chemistry, and sea level change.
A 2024 Nature paper, for example, finds no detectable surge in the rate of global warming beyond the 1970s.
While a William Happer study examines atmospheric radiative transfer and finds additional CO2 produces diminishing warming due to absorption band saturation.
Research by Judith Curry highlights large uncertainties in sea level projections.
While other studies examine solar variability and natural circulation patterns as major climate drivers.
Many papers question climate model reliability and attribution methods that link modern warming to human CO2 emissions.
At the very least, these 300 plus studies show that climate science remains an active field of debate, not the 'settled science' often presented to the public.
Ancient Artifacts Prove Glaciers Come And Go Naturally — No CO2 Required
Physics and archaeology both point to the Sun — not the atmosphere — as the engine behind glacier retreat. via @ccdeditor
https://t.co/RMbi68Ge57
Every plant on Earth grows faster today with the same water and sunlight and nutrients than it would have in millions of years
Learn more at https://t.co/bcpUAC0QKL
The IPCC says snowfall should become less frequent in a warming world. Yet when Japan was buried by record snow in January 2026, the explanation changed. Researchers claimed global warming increased the snowfall.
The storm itself was straightforward: a prolonged surge of Arctic air crossed the Sea of Japan, producing intense snowbands.
Sapporo transport shut down.
Aomori set depth records.
Communities across northern Honshu were buried. And Japan's army was even deployed.
Instead of simply pointing to the cold air outbreak though, researchers at Japan's Meteorological Institute instead ran climate model simulations.
The models concluded warming increased snowfall by about 7%. So the theory now reads: global warming reduces snow, except when it increases snow...
Under this framework, every possible outcome appears to confirm the same conclusion.
"A theory that explains everything explains nothing."
The vast, featureless wastes of the Sahara Desert have shrunk by about 8% since the 1980s.
This astonishing recovery is due to rising CO₂ levels, fueling a remarkable global green renaissance. Data from NASA’s AVHRR and MODIS instruments show 25% to 50% of Earth's vegetated lands have become significantly greener—an area equivalent to twice the continental United States that has also spurred a global windfall for agricultural production.
CO₂ fertilisation has driven around 70% of this boom, making green plants far more efficient with water. By reducing the time stomata (leaf pores) stay open, it directly cuts water loss and boosts drought resistance.
This unplanned green miracle has allowed vegetation to reclaim zones of great emptiness in inhospitable places like the Sahel (the Sahara's southern fringe), the Middle East and Australia's sunburned outback desert. It has reclaimed over 700,000 km2 of barren sand waste in the Sahara alone, pushing back the desert in formerly barren terrain.
Atmospheric CO₂ now hovers around 426 ppm, enabling plants to thrive where once they couldn't. This protracted greening shows the clear, measurable benefit from higher levels of CO₂.
Today's warming is not unusual.
A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history.
The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years.
Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years.
Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today.
The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.
Only one molecule of every 85,000 in the atmosphere is CO2 of human origin. Thirty-two CO2 molecules of natural origin are among that same 85,000. Climate alarmists tell us that this one human-induced CO2 molecule is the driving force behind climate change while the other 32 are not. We must assume this means that some CO2 molecules are more equal than others.