@DavidSGingras @dsfrancis03 Sir. This tweet belies DEEP ignorance of how these things work and makes it clear that you do not have the expertise to even know what you are trying to discover.
This investigation is utterly meaningless. You wouldn't even know what you found if there was anything to find
@DavidSGingras@treasureEilyn Ok so you don't even have what was filed? Why are you tweeting about metadata of a correct date on a file that ain't even the original filed file?
@DavidSGingras@MoJo71368 Did you really π
If course I absolutely believe this with no proof at all from your side.
Known truth teller who would never mislead anyone David S Gringas
@DavidSGingras @SavageCindrPant I don't even know why you are tweeting anything about an active case you are working on.
It's weird.
It's not something I expect from a professional lawyer, and if you weren't doing so you wouldn't have run afoul of this.
@DavidSGingras@taraturai60952@okiedokeylaw Is her CA court order covered by a constitutional right or has the judge committed a different crime that you've not highlighted yet?
@DavidSGingras@taraturai60952@okiedokeylaw I have checked the 14th amendment and it reads
"...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;"
Has Laura been deprived of life, liberty or property?
Did you not clarify this part with her before she came to her belief?
@DavidSGingras@taraturai60952@okiedokeylaw Ok, I kept reading after your red line and see that it also says "or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity"
Have you made any steps to verify this claim beyond "someone said that they said that he said" (I believe this is known as hearsay?)
@DavidSGingras @iluvboogerz Works for what? What are you talking about? This is just prepping for her inevitable argument that she can't afford to pay the fees.
Not a good look saying that if she was in Paris.
Literally no one wants her dead. We want her to admit to ALL her lies and take accountability
@DavidSGingras@Fenchurch72@Desertwitch3 Your client has demonstrated a willingness and ability to edit documents pertaining to pregnancy. An ultrasound and a blood HCG test.
Given this history, it is reasonable to argue that she believed she would be able to lie about the results through further fabrications
@DavidSGingras@brightside155@Fenchurch72@Desertwitch3 I don't know if you saw the Nov 2 hearing since it was before your time and thus seemingly irrelevant to you, but she also said "on Friday I literally had the doctor send it to him directly" in regards to HIPAA releases for Clayton.
Is that a mistatement or exaggeration also?
@DavidSGingras@brightside155@Fenchurch72@Desertwitch3 Actually, her argument was that it wasn't harassment because her contact was warranted because she was pregnant with his twins, making that a material fact for that case.
Hope this helps :)
@DavidSGingras@Fenchurch72@Desertwitch3 She was in front of judge Gialketsis for Claytons IAH
Laura's argument was that her contact was warranted because she was pregnant with Claytons twins at the time
If she was not seeing any pregnancy related doctors as she claimed, that should be a material fact to her argument