Nathan Mellor

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @ABeevus80479 @christinathelee Okay- my mistake then. Given the phase of trial, I think her policy of asking for a formal motion was appropriate Since her staff answered, I don't know if she ever got the message. Taking her non-response as proof of guilt is ridiculous.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @okiedokeylaw You said "there is evidence showing the judge shared information about this case with her father." What evidence? You only have evidence he was there.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @ABeevus80479 @christinathelee So you know she shouldn't respond to an ex parte communication, and you take that as proof? You added a heap of speculation. What witnesses do you plan to call at the hearing?

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @iluvboogerz A normal person could simply post on social media to clear up any misunderstanding about her whereabouts - if desired. But Laura gets offended and has to call a lawyer to argue on social media for her.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @miss_medusa1 That's an opinion of yours. Do you consider Laura's case "of significance"?

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@jayhipNE @DavidSGingras And why would you (Gingras) rely on us to do your research, when you can't be bothered to use a middle initial? Nobody but you cared about the answer when you asked about appellate, but now you've put false info in a filing, so of course, you'll get scrutinized.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@miss_medusa1 @DavidSGingras There it is, @DavidSGingras. Are you happy to be wrong?

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras And this video shows some appelate cases. https://t.co/zbbZdg2v47

[Seeking Justice for All Victims of Laura Owens @ClaytonsJustice]

So @DavidSGingras claims in his most recent filing that Gregg Woodnick’s “litigation experience in higher-level cases is virtually non-existent” and that a search for Gregg Woodnick in Lexi-Nexis produces ZERO results. It appears that is a lie - here is a search for Gregg Woodnick that produces seven different cases. So is Gingras just an idiot who cannot do basic research or is he a liar, just like his client #LauraOwens?
#justiceforclayton #justiceforallvictimsoflauraowens #LauraOwensisaliar #ProsecuteLauraOwens #truecrime

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras You left out the middle initial R so that your search came up with zero results. "A search for “Gregg Woodnick” in Lexis-Nexis literally produces zero results; nothing." Unless you amend your filing, I consider that a lie.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras Are you going to amend the filing? https://t.co/zbbZdg2v47

[Seeking Justice for All Victims of Laura Owens @ClaytonsJustice]

So @DavidSGingras claims in his most recent filing that Gregg Woodnick’s “litigation experience in higher-level cases is virtually non-existent” and that a search for Gregg Woodnick in Lexi-Nexis produces ZERO results. It appears that is a lie - here is a search for Gregg Woodnick that produces seven different cases. So is Gingras just an idiot who cannot do basic research or is he a liar, just like his client #LauraOwens?
#justiceforclayton #justiceforallvictimsoflauraowens #LauraOwensisaliar #ProsecuteLauraOwens #truecrime

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Pragmaticgal @itgoatee You don't have evidence that MAta discussed the case with her father and you can't prove that a comment on your blog is the only possible place she could have gotten that information.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Pragmaticgal @itgoatee You had proof for one thing - Mata's dad was at the courthouse- and you made up the rest.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras Wow. She didn't know you were trying to get her pulled?

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Desertwitch3 @BeccaforJustice Why was the 102 number a problem for Laura? Enough to where she changed it to send to the press?

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Ponietails You posted that she had $400k in a checking account earlier.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@VisitingBoise @DavidSGingras @Desertwitch3 Yeah, and Gingras was trying REALLY hard to get her to stick to late June.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Fenchurch72 @Desertwitch3 As of TODAY, Laura still doesn't seem to know that the Ravgen test confirmed she wasn't pregnant, so why claim she knew it back then? Do you agree that the first Ravgen test confirmed she wasn't pregnant? Then please let her know.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Fenchurch72 @Desertwitch3 If she really "knew" that, then why did she continue to claim she was pregnant for months. And you probably don't know that she cancelled an earlier Ravgen test, claiming Clayton refused it when Clayton was on his way to take it.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Fenchurch72 @Desertwitch3 Because she thought she could claim miscarriage or something later, duh, and escape all consequences.

[Nathan Mellor @NathanMatDT]

@DavidSGingras @Fenchurch72 @Desertwitch3 Is that part of Laura's (and your) strategy?