@Cobtribefan If that number is real, Google must be betting the house on something that needs insane compute. Wonder what happens if the AI hype cools before 2029 though.
🚨 AI may become the biggest political trade of the next decade.
Trump now wants the American public to own a piece of the AI boom.
Not just Wall Street.
Not just venture capital.
Not just early investors.
Every American.
The idea is simple:
If companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and xAI become the most powerful companies in history, the public should share in that upside.
This is not a normal policy headline.
This is a signal.
Sam Altman pushed the idea first.
Bernie Sanders wants to go even further with a public AI wealth fund.
Trump is now openly saying the government will look into it.
Think about how crazy that is:
Bernie has spent his whole career fighting billionaires.
Trump built his brand defending them.
They almost never agree on economics.
But now both sides are looking at AI and saying the same thing:
This technology is too powerful to be owned by only a few people.
That tells me one thing:
AI is no longer just a tech story.
AI is becoming a national wealth story.
The private companies are obvious:
OpenAI
Anthropic
xAI
But the public market angle is where investors should focus:
$MSFT — OpenAI ecosystem
$AMZN — Anthropic + AI cloud
$GOOG — AI models + cloud + infrastructure
$NVDA — AI chips
$AVGO — custom AI chips
$AMD — AI GPU challenger
$META — AI platform + data centers
$TSLA — xAI / robotics / autonomy narrative
$ORCL — AI infrastructure demand
The market is still treating AI like a normal growth cycle.
I don’t think it is.
When politicians from completely opposite sides start fighting over who owns the AI upside, that means the real money is already too big to ignore.
My view is simple:
Don’t chase every AI headline.
Don’t buy hype blindly.
Watch the companies controlling compute, cloud, chips, data and distribution.
That is where the real power sits.
AI is not just changing technology.
AI is changing ownership.
Not financial advice.
@meloncurls21 Maps and Gmail alone are such ingrained daily tools, it's wild how often their strategic value gets overlooked in the shadow of search revenue.
@saffronroseacts Drops like this usually sting but I've seen way worse recoveries in this sector. The custom chip angle is what makes them different from just another supplier.
@Ragequeen__ The market cap still feels way too tied to hype over actual revenue. Energy storage and AI are interesting bets but not guaranteed payoffs.
@BlockheadsMedia Been watching MU too. That swing from 820 to 1088 was wild but it felt like retail got caught chasing the hype. 857-879 zone is make or break—if it holds, maybe we see a retest higher. If it breaks, next stop could get ugly.
@MikePinto3 100x by 2030 sounds like one of those projections that looks great on paper but hinges on a lot of stars aligning. Still, Starlink alone already changed the game for internet access.