@AstroMikeMerri@maxtempers 2/2 GDP per cap growth started to slow from '97 (earnings ratio flat broad peak then), but misallocation due to loose monetary policy, & energy policy. Loop likely set off by other policies but amplified by compression that is then one possible lever that could be pulled.
@AstroMikeMerri@maxtempers 1/2 The incentive gradient has flattened (classic result for skill acquisition & risk taking). Most dramatic 90:10 earnings ratio fall from 2011. But causality will run in both directions to & from growth (there is a loop).
@AstroMikeMerri@maxtempers The growing gap you show is inflation. In real terms (CPIH 2001 to 2025) the gap was flat. The 90:10 ratio dropped 26% The ratio is relevant (like using CV not SD) Consumption relative advantage slashed and S & I power compressed. The behavioural incentive cut reduces motivation.
@JAHeale Devolution decentralises institutionalism.
Devolution → new institutions → friction → intervention → more institutions → more friction.
Only Reform get sovereignty vs institutionalism is the issue. But institutionalism is so entrenched one political party can't remove it.
@JAHeale Devolution decentralises institutionalism.
Devolution → new institutions → friction → intervention → more institutions → more friction.
Only Reform get sovereignty vs institutionalism is the issue. But institutionalism is so entrenched one political party can't remove it.
@dsmitheconomics Labour intentionally prohibited the Midlands developing in the 1960s (Office &Industrial Development Certificates) and Burnham is just another LabLibCon example of an intent that the Midlands is bypassed so as to retain London centrality. Smoke & mirrors from LabLibCon since WW2.
@Artemisfornow To be fair the slump is since 2020 & due to the administrative state (inc the BoE) under Con and Lab. The more recent inflation effect was Sunak's printing not just LabLibCon net zero. That Lab gives misinformation doesn't excuse the others who entrenched the structure since WW2.
@reformparty_uk 3/5 Therefore the long‑overdue sovereignty vs institutionalism/managerialism battle cannot be simply won by the sovereignty side because the system is structurally stacked against real deregulation.
@richardaeden Just part of erasing British culture and history. Finishing touches being made now.
MSM still framing 'unite the right' without recognising finalising of LabLibCon's managerialism with only Reform being anti-institutionalism and sovereign centrality.
White people are terrified of being seen as racist.
If white guilt permeates the online world and our schools, then our adults will feel guilty too.
This helps neither whites nor ethnics.
My ARC speech:
@thecoastguy The issue is the narratives, knowledge and cultural seeds that are worth preserving in case an external shock ever frees the individual from post-democrtic managerialism, our adminsistraitve domestication.
@GBNEWS "saying growth can only be nurtured from the ground up" - indeed, scrap as much local and national govt, and public bodies as possible. Scrap huge piles of law and regs.
From the ground up should mean the individual (not expanding levels of govt).
@toadmeister No. LabLibCon are institutionalist, only Reform is sovereign centric & so fundamental about the need for systemic change. If Reform cannot win, they need the seats to be the official opposition. Don't risk making the Cons the official opposition again. https://t.co/cpWiF4A1TM
1/ 5 Economic & cultural deregulation — full removal of state‑created friction — is required. LabLibCon treat the adjustment period as the problem, not the solution. This creates a self‑reinforcing loop: friction ↑ → intervention ↑ → friction ↑.
Hey, @grok, beyond Neuralink's high-bandwidth signals, how might EEG's noisy but real data from everyday users push @xai toward human-AI symbiosis by Grok 5, 6, 7 ... ?
1/ 5 Economic & cultural deregulation — full removal of state‑created friction — is required. LabLibCon treat the adjustment period as the problem, not the solution. This creates a self‑reinforcing loop: friction ↑ → intervention ↑ → friction ↑.
@reformparty_uk 4/5 @reformparty_uk's best move isn’t to chase short‑term influence through compromise, but to build a clear, coherent counter‑narrative and keep it alive, whether in government or opposition. It is the only viable counter lever.