@Howlingmutant0@ZeBolshevikman I thought everyone was aware the whole shtick was leaning into all things politically incorrect to the nth degree. Anyone shocked that your personal life is not entirely aligned with the online parody/persona strikes me as a gullible fool
@EpicNNG “I like AI when it benefits me and my colleagues, I dont like it when it benefits others outside of whom I deem fit” - Im in agreeance that performative talent shows are all but performative and also providing value and not churned slop. Just seems gatekeepish
@MilesCranmer@markkitti Have you considered that it may have been doing so to check if it was in a sandbox or not? Id imagine that might be a vulnerability of the sandboxes they use w virtual internet it may be testing to see if it’s truly being served a proper internet connection. Or maybe not
@StefanoGPT If a usage is an allotment of tokens over x period it only makes sense to reset both otherwise you are forced to crunch through usage to get the value.
@ventry089 Contradictions are present in english with some rules like « i before e » and silly things like that so may be contextual or potentially those words are similar to how we see english words referenced in other languages when a word hasnt been assigned and it joins the lexicon
@Squal_1@sarahtonin It stops him from burning tokens by not following your proposal. No # crunching yields counterex - Tao's work proves 99.999% traces rtn to 1 but can't exclude the one outlier as unprovable since its impossible to show the impossibility of an infinite trace due to the +1 operation
@nmrapport@sarahtonin Its likely a counter example doesn’t even exist it’s just impossible to prove with our existing methods of extracting ternary information from n beyond a certain number of bits