@angertab Why not reference the vertical power pole to calculate the angle of attack?
Also, this is only valid if you’re looking exactly sideways to the trajectory of the missile. Any other perspective will give you the wrong angle.
@AI_EmeraldApple Judging by the initial ai slop analysis, if the person filming rotated their phone a bit more, the attack angle trajectory could match a tomahawk trajectory. Just sayin, it’s possible.
@CountingCoupTac Dumb dumb you can’t tell what the angle is for an object moving in 3d unless you have multiple 2d reference planes. If the video was shot from a perpendicular plane to the objects direction, everyone would say its attack angle was 90* therefore it was dropped from a blimp…
@MattWardel@AutismCapital Bruh. He was waving the runner towards him and when he points you can hear/see him say “get off the course” to the spectators that were running alongside or “you’re off the course” to the runner.
@Seandead@angertab You need stronger autism. It’s impossible to calculate the angle of a moving object in 3d from a single 2d plane of reference unless the reference is parallel to the plane the missile is travelling in. If the plane was perpendicular, your calculation would be 90* 😱
@angertab There’s a vertical telephone pole you could have used as a reference to get a more accurate angle, but you didn’t. Even if you did though, it’s impossible to calculate the angle of a moving object in 3d from a single 2d plane of reference.
@DanHollaway The attack angle is dumb dumb. He didn’t line up the angle calculation with the vertical telephone pole in the pic as a reference. Plus, the missile travels in 3D so without multiple 2d reference planes it’s impossible to determine the angle.
@sashamdige@angertab You can’t determine the angle based on one video alone. You’re both assuming the missile approached in a parallel plane as the vid, impossible to confirm.
If the video was shot perpendicular to the missile trajectory, your conclusion would be that the missile approached at 90*
@adamscochran Where did the guy in the black hat on the ground vanish to after the shots were fired?!?!
He fired the first accidental discharge and then the other ICE agent shot, thinking it was the suspect.
@adamscochran First shot was an accidental discharge by this guy and then the rest of the shots were because they thought the suspect shot. Also, he seemed to disappear after the shots were fired.
Not trying to defend ICE, but this seems the most plausible.
@adamscochran You missed an important detail. The first shot is isolated before the rest of the shots were fired.
The guy in the black hat on his knees unholsters his gun, accidental discharge, and then the other ICE agents fire thinking it was the suspect on the ground.