Most surprising consensus: low marks for the SEC. Most interesting discovery: asymmetries between shareholder proponents and companies required to respond.
My conversation with @DanielSLoeb1, his first ever podcast and one I've been wanting to do for years.
Dan started Third Point in 1995 with $3 million. Today the firm manages over $24 billion across equities, credit, venture, and insurance.
Along the way he wrote some of the most iconic activist letters.
We discuss:
- Why deep value stopped working
- The power of writing
- The Twitter and XAI credit trades
- Lessons from FTX and Danaher
- The Sony and Sotheby's stories
- What makes a great analyst today
- The importance of kindness
I feel lucky we all get to learn from one of the greats.
Enjoy!
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
2:48 Macro Views and Tech Trends
5:13 The Roots of Third Point
10:30 Evolving to Quality and Thematic Investing
19:07 Market Psychology and Inefficiencies
24:10 Good and Bad Corporate Governance
29:19 Activism
31:23 Sotheby's
41:37 AI
44:28 Sony
52:50 Danaher's Operating System
56:31 Building an Insurance Business
59:25 FTX
1:05:17 What Makes a Great Analyst Today
1:07:24 The Next Decade
1:10:00 Kindest Thing
Shareholder Proposals, the SEC, and an Unusual Proxy Season
With the SEC stepping back from active involvement in the shareholder-proposal process this proxy season, companies and proponents are operating in a more uncertain, self-directed environment. That shift has sharpened focus on how the system is actually working in practice.
Against that backdrop, recent coverage of the Weinberg Center’s shareholder proposal survey has focused on a few themes: sustained critiques of the SEC’s no-action process, renewed debate over whether shareholder proposals function primarily as engagement tools or as burdens, and close attention to the survey’s unusually broad, cross-constituency data set.
Importantly, the survey’s assessment of SEC performance reflects experience over the prior four to eight proxy seasons, not the current one. In that sense, the findings provide a baseline against which this season’s unusual dynamics — unfolding largely without SEC involvement — can now be evaluated.
What has been most striking is not disagreement — though it persists — but where there is agreement, particularly among constituencies that rarely see eye to eye on the SEC’s past performance and on structural asymmetries in the system.
Full survey and coverage here: https://t.co/ruWdEYPTuu
Most surprising consensus: low marks for the SEC. Most interesting discovery: asymmetries between shareholder proponents and companies required to respond.
On shareholder proposals, views differ sharply across shareholders, companies, and advisors—but there's agreement on core issues, including critical assessments of the SEC.
All this and more in the Weinberg Center’s new survey of 500+ participants. https://t.co/5GicwA4YoO
🎧 Big Wins for Your Bookshelf (and Your Portfolio)
Looking to level up your investing game this February? We’ve got some fantastic news for our US-based listeners! 🇺🇸
Three of our powerhouse titles are featured in the @audible_com February Monthly Deal. If you’re an Audible Premium Plus member, you can snag these unabridged essentials at a massive discount all month long:
The Essays of Warren Buffett by @CunninghamProf – The definitive collection of wisdom from the Oracle of Omaha Warren Buffett.
Pathfinders by @JLCollinsNH – Inspiring stories of financial independence and the routes taken to get there.
Just Keep Buying by @dollarsanddata – A data-driven deep dive into why saving and investing doesn’t have to be complicated.
Take the large-scale national survey about the shareholder proposal rule--very important for shareholders and companies. About 12 minutes to complete. https://t.co/XMI63jumuN
'The Warren Buffett Shareholder' author Lawrence Cunningham reflects on life and legacy of the Berkshire Hathaway vice chairman on 'The Claman Countdown.'
@FoxBusiness@ClamanCountdown
https://t.co/QvqeySLpYt
LECTURE PUBLISHED: Delaware may be the country's last best hope for maintaining balance and rationality in our system of corporate governance. Its corporate governance policies protect long-term focused shareholders rather than the short-term political an…https://t.co/UbD9NdV0UR
Corporate boards, and audit committees, need FEWER duties, not more, particularly concerning the proliferation of "risks" interest groups continue to dream up and advocate for. https://t.co/LmFFosbavB
You can’t make this up. Here I’m getting comfortable, ready to unwrap my new book, bookmark in my hand, I look over and my soon-to-be instant friend from Malaysia has the exact same book in her lap! Thank you! @CunninghamProf $BRK #OnlyInOmaha
Sold out! Margin of Trust and The Essays of Warren Buffett sold out at the Bookworm in the Berkshire meeting before lunch! Brisk businesss—thanks to our readers and Phil, Steve and the whole staff. Stephanie and I will take a break for lunch!! https://t.co/7lp2dDRo2N
Wall St. J.s' @bzcohen quotes me and my friend David Kass on Warren Buffett's best investment decisions ever--as Warren says, there were only a dozen great ones. Read on, but first guess which ones! https://t.co/r6yRMUK6Ii
@dougchia Warren has never dumped on board diversity (the Berkshire board has 5 women 2 people of color), although he never puts that feature above business savvy or interest in Berkshire.
Warren Buffett, same old self as anti-woke, in this guest essay for the New York Times by my friend Roger Lowenstein. A must read for anyone seeking rationality. https://t.co/T8xci7WCV5
@dougchia Thx, but that has nothing to do with Buffett or the differences between his traditional philosophy and that of influential corporate policy leaders today. That seems to me a vital debate that’s not really happening.