Phasmid

Something beautiful is going to happen

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@choopius @ElmuridSapien @MountainGenera You wont believe what Skyrim is full of

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@Player0129876 @Keerurgo https://t.co/0SAVKoJms6

Come on dude

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@vigintuple @Karudon_DK @TheVoiceofSpri1 3. I live in London. Do you earnestly think that every time I go to a white-owned restuarant that serves a dish with, idk, cardamom, they should land acknowledge India?

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@vigintuple @Karudon_DK @TheVoiceofSpri1 1. To what degree is the USA *actively* exploiting the Philipines?
2. The OP literally made his own recipe, and did not claim ownership over an existing one. He explained multiple times he had to build a recipe that worked with his commercial machine.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@vigintuple @Karudon_DK @TheVoiceofSpri1 Do we have to make land acknowledgments to Peru and Chile when we cook with tomatoes?

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @anima76 @GenioMaher @OneHipNinja @queerBengali "Eating meat is morally because natural events are morally neutral and eating meat is natural."

Ipse dixit. Circular reasoning. Naturalistic fallacy.

Nothing to ground your morals in. Too stupid to realise he has no argument. Whatever man.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @h33ndawg @OneHipNinja @queerBengali "Humans killing animals is a neutral event because humans are predators because humans kill animals".

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @anima76 @GenioMaher @OneHipNinja @queerBengali You have no moral framework to actually justify this. It's an ipse dixit. There's no reason as to why it's neutral without appealing to nature.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @h33ndawg @OneHipNinja @queerBengali Holy low iq. Admit you don't understand the hypothetical. Death isn't a fucking moral agent you moron. The "aliens" are analogous to us. They can self-prescribe moral superiority, which is fundamental to your initial claim. Is an alien human-farm morally equal to an animal farm?

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @OneHipNinja @queerBengali Not even going to entertain your cowardly attempts at avoiding the question until you DIRECTLY address it.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@Sherbx1 @h33ndawg @SanjidaTuru @OneHipNinja @queerBengali Building an ethical framework that isn't built upon the ipse-dixitistic notion that 'humaness' is some unique moral quality. I would start with the capacity for conscious suffering, personally.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @OneHipNinja @queerBengali Nice strawman. Much like getting all the nutrients you need in your diet, there are ways to remove rodents from your home without animal-death.

You still haven't answered my hypothetical, and I assume it's because the only way for you to be logically consistent is to say "yes".

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@h33ndawg @SanjidaTuru @OneHipNinja @queerBengali I'm not contending that it wouldn't be a natural event, but that humans prescribing unique moral worth to *themselves* to *morally* justify the subjugation of other lifeforms is stupid.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@hanaxhunt @SanjidaTuru @KingBika1 @King_Will_Power @PhilipMPowell @queerBengali I argue with anti-vegans constantly, and they *never* accept the naturalistic fallacy because it's central to the justification of their beliefs. There's no argument beyond it.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @OneHipNinja @queerBengali A misuse of that term bc you can't grasp the hypothetical. Your argument relies on humans' self-determining their 'humaness' as a quality that gives them unique moral consideration. If an alien lifeform used the same logic, surely you would grant them that?

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @OneHipNinja @queerBengali You are avoiding the question. Tigers aren't moral agents with the capacity to intentionally kill without waste and pain.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@SanjidaTuru @OneHipNinja @queerBengali Would you accept the idea that if a alien species with greater intellect and conscious capacity discovered us, and decided it was fine to kill us to make use of our bodies, but did so without waste or pain, they would be morally justified?

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@layorz1 @forestofcake Most Researched Antivegan Award

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@cureflora4ever @c0wmeow @hfkzelda I think all conscious life deserves self determination. As moral agents, we should do our best to honour that. Lions aren't moral agents. I don't think painless death somehow makes slaughter ethical.

We can stop eating them. Entire cultures exist that do not eat animals. I have.

[Phasmid @CunoSympathiser]

@cureflora4ever @c0wmeow @hfkzelda Yes, it was determined over a period of time that the violation of a sentient being's rights was not justified by biological or dogmatic reasons. We are slowly getting there regarding the abuse, rape, and slaughter of animals.

I hate having to spell things out like this.