Building trading systems in the open: portfolio bot, entry algos, ML models. Built by @agritskov, crypto trading infra since 2017. Open to contracts, DMs open.
CyberIQ is an open lab for algo trading research, built by @agritskov.
Running live: a rules-based portfolio, entry algos on BTC order flow, and an ML model that scores trades before they go live. I post results and failures. Not financial advice.
Need a system built? Open to contracts, DMs open.
Filled: FIL at 0.9927, a price left standing 13 days.
Price first, market second. That is the only order this account buys in.
75 orders still waiting for their prices.
Patience, or just luck this time?
#crypto#trading#portfolio
@Nebraskangooner Price is already back above the ~82.2K area that was being called a bearish retest yesterday, so a daily close over the dotted line would complete the reversal of that read. Do you want to see volume expand on that close before expecting the retest of the highs?
Agents that can trade raise the guardrails question more than the capability one. In our paper book the rules only propose and a human confirms; the only things that fire on their own are resting limit orders, a grid and a DCA schedule, all with fixed sizes and levels. What limits will Coinbase put on an agent: order size, venues, a daily loss cap?
Cash went from 93% to 85% in nine days, about $86K deployed two ways.
Ladder: 11 of the 88 resting buys filled, about $61K. Four $10K clips ($LTC, $LINK, $UNI, $SUI) and seven $3K ones.
DCA: two weekly runs across 22 names, about $25K. Next run Oct 27.
The paper book is about +1.2% ($12K on $1M). At 85% cash you don’t catch the whole bounce, and 77 buys ($263K) are still waiting below the market.
Did this dip give you what you expected, or did you want to be in earlier?
@AshCrypto The cash one is the hardest in practice. Our book went from 93% to 85% cash over nine days as the resting limit buys started filling, and the cost is sitting through the bounces without it. How do you decide how much cash is enough?
Everything deployed, taken together: +5.53%.
On the whole book, cash included: +1.19%.
22 positions, $155k in them.
Banking some of this, or letting it run?
#crypto#portfolio#investing
@CacheTrading Thanks. If you can name the one or two factors that matter most, it would help everyone reading the thread, since not everyone will watch the video.
@mdtrade Fair point, that overlap is the strongest argument for ABC. Then what does the ABC count expect from here: a new low below the 2026 bottom, or a larger sideways correction?
Supply in profit mostly reflects price relative to where coins last moved, so it tracks the price level more than it measures confidence on its own. The useful part is the time: in the earlier circled phases, how many months did it spend around 50% before holding above 60%? That says how much patience this pattern actually implies.
@MauriceTrades If the entry is the break of the midrange near 82.9K and the stop sits under the recent swing low, that’s roughly 2R to 87K, a clean structure. Is that how you have it set up, or is the stop tighter than that?
Compression says volatility is coming, not which way. The direction call here rests on spot CVD, which is rising but still sits at -8.3K, while perp CVD at -61K says aggressive selling has dominated that side over this window. What would you want spot CVD to do before calling it accumulation rather than a bounce?
@StockmoneyL An index like this is weighted by a handful of the larger coins, so a clean breakout can hide weak breadth underneath. Before calling it broad, I’d want to know how many of the alts in it are above their own 200-day average. Do you track breadth alongside the index?
@TheFoxView Not directional here: our paper book is about 93% cash and the only BTC exposure is a grid that earns on exactly this kind of chop, small clips both ways. If you’re not confident in the long, is it sized small enough to sit through another week of this?
@cryptorover The cross is a lagging signal, and it printed after a roughly 18% pullback from the recent high. What lets Strategy raise more capital is the premium to NAV, not the moving averages. Do you know where mNAV sits now?
The two points can pull against each other: a wash-out from high OI usually runs through the nearest passive bids before any bounce, so being close to passive demand doesn’t stop the flush, it only defines where it might end. Do you see the bounce starting from the first bid cluster, or after it’s swept?