@rebeltransam@Xx_Boone_xX@Gina_T1 So first you say he's wrong because a Communist party *exists*. Now he's wrong because the Liberal party is communist? So which is it? Because if the Liberals are obviously communist, why wouldn't you use them as your example?
@macabrepov@rebeltransam@Xx_Boone_xX@Gina_T1@grok Anyone with a shred of reading comprehension understood what was being said. Unsurprisingly, idiots who think Communism is a problem are the same idiots who can't read properly.
@rebeltransam@Xx_Boone_xX@Gina_T1@grok Holy shit. Communism EXISTING is not the same as it actively being a threat. I know a few people with opinions like this, is it a coincidence that, to a man, none of them have jobs and are net negative citizens?
@rebeltransam@Xx_Boone_xX@Gina_T1 Trump literally says we "take advantage of the US". The only interest he is claiming to have is with the American people. If you believe for 1 second we gives a shit about Canada you're a fool. He would be happy to see our economy tank and our people without work.
@TheWorldWatchWW@Xrayyy23@Ray_May13@UpsideDownPepsi@oevertonxavier@jesca_amina If you want to to ignore the fact the cop pulled him over for an extremely minor reason and the whole reason the situation escalated is because the cop matched the driver's energy instead of de-escalating. I don't think the driver is blameless but this was completely unnecessary.
@Xrayyy23@Ray_May13@UpsideDownPepsi@oevertonxavier@jesca_amina So give the guy a warning and if you can see he is agitated then try to de-escalate rather than turn the situation up to 11 for no fucking reason whatsoever. Should the driver have complied? Yes. But that doesn't justify the actions of the police here.
@0SlyFlyGuy0@JustinLanes2 @DecodedWatch @WarMonitor3 Literally every conflict the US has been involved in since WW2 has been undeclared by congress. You are not correct.
@Timcast I remember watching your pro Trump content in like 2020 dude. What do you mean? So you would shill for Republicans, but not vote for them until now?
@JonathanFior@peet365@WarMonitor3 I don't, its just common sense. The US military is excellent, but its not perfect. Its foolish to send a small contingent of Marines to a single island within tube artillery rage of the mainland without the ability to give them overwhelming fire support, or a broader operation.
@JonathanFior@peet365@WarMonitor3 Its all bluster and words until Marines are on shore taking casualties. The American appetite for seeing dead US soldiers is literally 0, and any resistance of a seaborne landing is bound to take some casualties. The defenses are not instant nor perfect. And 20 KMยฒ is not big.
@JonathanFior@peet365@WarMonitor3 1. All of that counter battery equipment needs to be deployed during or immediately following a hot landing (assuming some kind of Iranian resistance on the island). Its not instant, and Iran will have loitering munitions and drones of their own, not to mention tube & rocket arty
@JonathanFior@peet365@WarMonitor3 Controlling Kharg means marines would be under near constant bombardment from artillery on the mainland, even with air supremacy. It would be very difficult to supply and reinforce them.