D K BHUVA

DKBHUVA

[ANUPAM MISHRA @scribe9104]

मनुस्मृति का पितृसत्तात्मक समाज और राहुल गांधी के लिबरल समर्थक 😎

[subash kumar @Krishan10_]

Manusmriti forced this 9 year old child to marry a 55 year old man.

[Dr Poornima 🇮🇳 @PoornimaNimo]

Acvording to Rahul Gandhi, Manusmriti which is read and followed by 0.0001% of Hindus teaches 100 crore Hindus to discriminate between girls and boys, whereas other religions place women on a pedestel and treat them with respect, dignity and allow them every freedom.

[Vikram Pratap Singh @VIKRAMPRATAPSIN]

Women empowerment 🐒

[News Algebra @NewsAlgebraIND]

Rahul Gandhi has announced Smash Patriarchy campaign.

But when it comes to Hijab and Abaya, he says it's "FREEDOM OF CHOICE".

[BJP @BJP4India]

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐦𝐬 “𝐒𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐲” 𝐚𝐧𝐝 “𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐠𝐞”… 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐚 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲.

Watch how the party that lectures the nation on women’s rights has repeatedly failed them. 🎥

The hypocrisy isn’t hidden anymore. It’s right here, on record. ▶️

[S Raghunatha Prabhu, Modi ka Pariwar @SRaghunathaPra1]

First photo - woman in Saree - lack of freedom

Second - in black. Full of freedom

[Sheetal Chopra 🇮🇳 @SheetalPronamo]

Smash the Patriarchy for Hindus

Hijab is a CHOICE for Muslims

Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy

[Aaruhi Reddy 🥷 @CuteAaruhi4]

The Manusmriti is not a religious scripture for Hindus, and 99% of Hindus do not follow it.

On the other hand, the Quran is the religious scripture of Muslims, and Muslims strictly follow it. Everyone knows what it says about women.

Still, Rahul Gandhi keeps targeting the Manusmriti in the name of fighting patriarchy.

The truth is that he does not have a problem with patriarchy; he has a problem with Hinduism. He simply looks for excuses to attack Hindu dharma.

If he genuinely cares about women’s rights, he should question all religious books and traditions that do not support equality and freedom for women.

[Amit Malviya @amitmalviya]

“Pinjra Todo” or “Family Todo”?

Rahul Gandhi’s latest rhetoric on the Indian family deserves far greater scrutiny than it is receiving.

He is telling young women that their fathers, husbands and sons are controlling them, that the family is a “cage”, and that this cage must be broken.

But there is one small problem: Indian women themselves do not seem to recognise the family Rahul Gandhi is describing.

At his Pune event, women who came on stage spoke about families that supported their education, sacrificed financially to send them to Pune, stood by them through difficult times and encouraged them to pursue their ambitions.

That is the Indian family.

It is not a cage. It is often the first source of emotional, social and financial security for a woman.

Of course, Indian families must evolve. Women must have complete freedom to make their own choices. Patriarchy, discrimination and violence must be challenged wherever they exist.

But liberating women does not require teaching them to regard their own families as enemies.

And Rahul Gandhi’s argument becomes even more curious when placed in the larger ideological context.

There is a global academic and activist discourse around “Dismantling Global Hindutva”, which seeks to portray Hindutva and, increasingly, Indian civilisational institutions through a uniformly oppressive lens. The language of “patriarchy”, “structures of oppression”, “dismantling” and the wholesale rejection of traditional social institutions often travels through this ecosystem.

Rahul Gandhi may not call his politics by that name. But when the family, tradition, Hindu civilisation and Indian social institutions are repeatedly presented as inherently oppressive structures that must be dismantled, one is entitled to ask:

Is this Indian political reform or the importation of an ideological framework developed elsewhere?

And there is another glaring contradiction.

If Rahul Gandhi wants to lecture India about women’s liberation, why does he selectively attack Hindu society while refusing to apply the same scrutiny to regressive practices that have existed elsewhere?

Why the silence on polygamy?
Why the silence on unilateral divorce practices?
Why the silence on practices that historically restricted women’s mobility and autonomy?

Women’s rights cannot be a selective political weapon.

India’s own civilisational tradition provides a very different story.

The Vedic tradition remembers women such as Gargi, Maitreyi, Lopamudra and Apala as intellectual and spiritual figures. Women have never been strangers to Indian philosophical and cultural life.

And modern India has gone much further.

Women today are property owners, entrepreneurs, scientists, pilots, soldiers, ministers and political leaders. Government schemes have significantly expanded women’s access to bank accounts, housing, entrepreneurship and economic opportunity. Women have received permanent commission in the armed forces and occupy positions of authority across the State.

That is empowerment.

Empowerment means giving a woman the freedom to choose, not deciding in advance that her family, faith and civilisation are the obstacles she must escape.

There is also something deeply ironic about Rahul Gandhi’s politics.

He speaks about dismantling structures while standing atop one of India’s most famous political dynasties.

He invokes the language of liberation while belonging to a family whose own political history is inseparable from the institutions of the Indian National Congress.

And now he appears determined to disown even the intellectual inheritance of his own political family.

If Gandhi, Nehru and Ambedkar were all wrong about everything Rahul Gandhi now seeks to overturn, perhaps he should say so explicitly.

Because what we are witnessing increasingly looks less like conventional electoral politics and more like an NGO-style ideological campaign against Indian society itself.

India does not need to choose between tradition and women’s freedom.

It needs to give women the freedom to choose their own lives without asking them to hate their families, reject their civilisation or dismantle their cultural identity in the process.

Rahul Gandhi can call that a cage.

Millions of Indian women call it home.

[Zeennat Rana @izeennatrana]

हिंदू महिलाओं के लिए “पितृसत्ता तोड़ो” का ज्ञान बाँटने वाले राहुल गांधी से बस इतना सवाल है कि हिजाब और अबाया की बात आते ही आपकी “महिला स्वतंत्रता” अचानक “Freedom of Choice” में कैसे बदल जाती है? क्या पितृसत्ता का विरोध भी धर्म देखकर होता है, या फिर आपके सेक्युलरिज़्म में डबल स्टैंडर्ड ही असली स्टैंडर्ड है?

[Megh Updates 🚨™ @MeghUpdates]

🚨 BIG DECISION BY ALLAHABAD HC

Allahabad High Court REJECTED a Muslim student’s plea to wear HIJAB with her school uniform. 🔥

Court said the petitioner FAILED to establish HIJAB as an essential RELIGIOUS practice and UPHELD the prescribed uniform.

[Boiled Anda @AmitLeliSlayer]

Rahul Gandhi wanted Hindu women to “SMASH PATRIARCHY.”

But when it comes to HIJAB and ABAYA, suddenly it’s “FREEDOM OF CHOICE.” 😱😱

[BJP @BJP4India]

𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞. 𝐏𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐨𝐱.

Rahul Gandhi lectures the nation against referring to women as “mother, sister or daughter.” And yet, on the campaign trail in Wayanad, he turns around and presents Priyanka as “your sister, your daughter, your mother” to win votes.

𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝, 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲, 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥. 🎭

[BJP Delhi @BJP4Delhi]

झूठ और मक्कारी का बेताज बादशाह 🤦‍♂️

[News Algebra @NewsAlgebraIND]

Rahul Gandhi mocked PM Modi's foreign policy.

Now, Russian President Vladimir Putin says that India-Russia trade is growing because of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s personal attention to the relationship 🔥

[Swaksh Tripathi @SwakshTripathi]

Katrina Kaif to Bramhanical Patriarchy ka Shikar hogayi

[Pradeep Bhandari(प्रदीप भंडारी)🇮🇳 @pradip103]

Appeasement and vote-bank come in way of "Smash Patriachy" pitch of Rahul Gandhi!

Rahul Gandhi's intention is not women empowerment; it is selective targeting of Hindu faith!

[Rahul (Proud Bhakt) @rahulpassi]

IIT से पढ़ा हुआ केजरीवाल एक स्कूल नहीं बनवा पाया लेकिन कॉकरोच को दिख ही नहीं रहा।

[Boiled Anda @AmitLeliSlayer]

In Nandigram 1 block there's a village named- Haripur,86% Hindu population.

Mamata Bano Govt gave Awas Yojana benefits to 54 families of this village.

Among 54 only 2 were Hindu, 52 were Mu$Iims 😱😱

Appeasement 😂😂