Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites.
🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements.
Today von der Leyen said:
"This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children".
💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984.
🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online".
💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different.
🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done".
💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof".
🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source".
💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant.
🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents".
💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust.
🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence"
💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do.
💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive.
💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child.
💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive.
🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed"
💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price.
🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof"
💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution".
💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity.
🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it".
💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely.
💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor.
💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law.
💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection.
🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content.
🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals.
💡Where this ends
🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever".
George Orwell, 1984.
@MonaKeijzer@amnestynl@amnesty In de coronatijd was @amnesty/ @amnestynl al geen knip voor de neus waard. Bij mij hoeven ze al jarenlang niet meer aan de deur te verschijnen met hun verhaaltjes.
@chrisklomp Ja, wat doen die geschonden grondrechtjes er nou ook eenmaal toe? En wat had het allemaal toch ook vreselijk veel zin, hè? 🙈
Suggestie: Als je er zo klaar mee bent, is het ook een optie om zelf je mond er dan ook niet meer over open te doen.
🚨 Help needed!
@tonfvandijk (36K followers) has lost access to his own Premium account due to a 2FA SMS issue.
Despite his Premium subscription and proof of ownership, X Support cannot verify him and even suggested creating a new account.
@XSupport@Premium@elonmusk
Please retweet to help bring attention to this 👇
#XHelp #AccountLocked
@mkeulemans@statistiekcbs Het gaat er toch gewoon om hoe veel mensen er in totaal naar een provincie gaan?
Als je gaat corrigeren op omvang dan ben je met een ander onderzoek bezig, wie heeft de meeste toeristen per vierkante meter, of zo.
@Reezyard OK! Dankjewel voor de toelichting 👍
Zie nu dat er ook een community note aan het filmpje hing maar volgens mij toont de app waarmee ik m’n X-berichten lees dat niet.
@mkeulemans@tonfvandijk Maarten, heb je nou echt niet door dat je zelf echt geen haar beter bent? 😂
Als jij tegen de haren in gestreken wordt, of het ergens niet mee eens bent, begin je te schelden en hele hitpiece-draadjes op X te plaatsen. Het liefst midden in de nacht.
“Opstoker” 😵💫
@mkeulemans Dan wordt het blijkbaar tijd voor drang en dwang voor De Goede Zaak.
Het klimaat moet toch immers gered worden? 🙈
Je legt je er wel heel makkelijk bij neer. 🤨
Het gaat snel: kinderen in de UK onder 16 mogen niet meer op social media.
Wat is hiervoor nodig?: een slot voor iedereen.
Wat is daarvoor nodig: iedereen krijgt een digitaal paspoort. Een QR code als sleutel.
Ditmaal om “de jeugd te beschermen”.
@GKBoris Het wordt voor je gedaan door je werkgever. Het is niet alsof je je er voor kan afmelden en het geld zelf kan investeren. 😅
Maar vrijwillig nog eigen geld in je pensioenfonds steken is natuurlijk wel een eigen keuze.
@SchoutenLegal Daar gaat het voor u klaarblijkelijk inderdaad om. Ik gebruik X voornamelijk voor nieuwsgaring en soms het geven van een reactie, een compleet ander doel dus.
Bedankt voor het delen van uw gedachtengang.
@SchoutenLegal Haha, wat een zwaktebod om zo uit de hoek te komen! 🙈
Een negatieve verhouding likes+retweets ten opzichte van reacties zegt in de regel anders ook niet veel goeds. Zie uw eigen openingsbericht.
Ik ben geen mediapersoonlijkheid, natuurlijk heb ik nauwelijks tractie.