@Creambastard@twenty6signs@_eeeeee_eeeeee_ Yeah and a bullet to the dome is a good conversation starter like what? π Racists are reprehensible, we can agree on that, but I cant condone generalized calls to violence. At least have a valid target. You're acting like its crazy someone can be opposed to that irrational shit
@discoursediary@twenty6signs@_eeeeee_eeeeee_ Specifically talkin bout "Kill all racists" Not even a couple pages in Frantz makes clear distinctions from intermediaries and the "bewildered" who enjoy privilege. Not once reading his work do I get a tinge of genocidal rhetoric even when he speaks of violence. Read it again.
@elfbfbaby@twenty6signs@_eeeeee_eeeeee_ Yes, and as a child of an oppressed and colonized country, I don't wish to use the same reactionary framework that excused and allowed my people to be subjugated by a stronger and more "righteous" global hegemon. Something something, an eye for an eye
@hakaritakako@FiamayeLive@twenty6signs Thats also what they did tho, you just didnt like them using morals to reason out their worldview because it conflicts with what you think you read from them
@Creambastard@twenty6signs@_eeeeee_eeeeee_ And im trying to figure out from your world view why progress is only possible through a reactionary lens. The more you create divisions between you and the enemy, the less communication can be had. Last I checked, racists need healthcare, housing and food too
@hakaritakako@FiamayeLive@twenty6signs "Kill all _" typa statements arent exactly the smartest way to think. Its reactionary and short sighted, its not a worldview that should be going around willy nilly. Its not moral posturing when its basic fucking sense. Theres 10x times better ways to get the point across.
@Creambastard@twenty6signs@_eeeeee_eeeeee_ Yes and that wasn't John Brown. Whereas the statement "Kill all racist" is much closer to that white boy than John Brown. I feel like my words are being lost to thin air here. Its a reactionary way of thinking.