@nitin_gadkari Gentle reminder that CR Das was a political visionary who authored the 1923 Bengal pact that among other things recommened:
- 60% reservation for Muslims in govt. jobs.
- ban on music in front of mosques
- cow slaughter be allowed for festivities.
@mushfiq_econ @aikhwaja@Shanta_WB@karthik_econ @ProfVarshney @pbmehta@afosterri@SouthAsiaBrown I feel it has a lot of do with centuries of caste system and more than a millennium of practicing varna and jati discrimination by a large section in the region.And instead of facing and resolving this issue we are often in deinal.
โYou can cheat to get a paper. You can cheat to get a degree. You can cheat to get a grant. You canโt cheat to cure a disease. Biology doesnโt care.โ
The Nature article now has a disclaimer!
One of the most cited papers (Lesne et. al 2006) on Alzheimer's may have fudged results leading to billions of dollars in misdirected investment towards finding a cure for almost two decades. It possibly cost millions of lives!
This hit hard.
https://t.co/nWJxm9M8QT
Despite all sanctions, this new SMIC 7nm development from China is a big deal.
Odd lots @TheStalwart@tracyalloway had a wonderful episode on ASML (https://t.co/GFcsV9tfYx)
which is barred from sharing photolithographic / EUV tech or product with China.
https://t.co/yh4Ihlfxo3
@MichaelKantro @stevehouf A not forward looking market would mean that there is some significant change in future expectations and prices are not adjusting to reflect that, until that expectation is actually realized.
@MichaelKantro @stevehouf We might be talking about slightly different things.
Fwd looking, as I understand, means stocks incorporates info related to future expectations.
Market efficiency means stocks incorporate all info super fast.
Markets can be fwd looking without being perfectly efficient.
@BallerThrowdown@rootslashbin@franklinisbored A paper from 2009 still found the ๐๐๐ ๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐ก, albeit it's not a profitable trading strategy. But that's a different discussion.
[https://t.co/dTE0jDLsFA]
@Kanesburner @nope_its_lily @CliffordAsness There is an "or" in there. Plus, at short enough duration, for retail investors bonds won't be loss making neither they will be profitable. Price will just converges to par value.
Weโre a research program at @UCSF that studies reproductive health, rights, and access.
We work hard to uncover the data so that policies can be research-driven.
Letโs be clear: Todayโs SCOTUS decision contradicts scientific evidence. [ a thread ๐งต]