Plaid Cymru have just announced junction closures around Newport, a plan to make a plan and that Newport isn’t a priority for new train stations.
Tell them it’s not on.
Sign the petition 👇
https://t.co/lVEOoStT5L
Plaid Cymru want to close M4 junctions in Newport:
❌ J27 High Cross: full closure
❌ J26 Malpas: east slips
❌ J25 Caerleon: east slips
Traffic chaos for residents, and the report admits worse air quality and noise. I'm totally opposed.
Page 39: https://t.co/dILckHwuWS
🚨Ballots dropping tomorrow 🚨
When you receive your ballot, vote for the unity and stability that our party needs to stand up to populism, and transform people’s lives 🌹
On 22 July, Robert Jenrick posted a short audio clip of Jo White, the new Immigration Minister, captioned as her saying: "I don't care if we stop the boats." The clip was picked up and amplified by Reform UK's official account, which framed it as evidence that Andy Burnham's government "doesn't give a stuff about stopping the boats" and called for a general election.
White responded directly, posting the fuller recording the clip had been taken from. In it, she can be heard saying: "I don't care who will stop the boats, but my priority... my focus is to make sure that we stop those boats." The background audio in her version matches the clip Jenrick posted, indicating both are drawn from the same underlying recording. What differs is the editing and the caption: "who will stop" became "if we stop," and the second half of the sentence, where she affirms stopping the boats as her priority, was cut.
The audio recording was posted by notorious right-wing purveyors of misinformation and disinformation, Guido Fawkes and Basil The Great, on 11th July 2025.
Both Jenrick and Reform UK subsequently deleted their posts. Neither issued a correction or apology.
Jenrick was then asked about the episode on TalkTV, in an interview with Jeremy Kyle. That exchange is worth examining closely, because the way he characterised the dispute does more to obscure what happened than to explain it (the transcript is from the interview).
To date, Jenrick and Reform UK have not issued an apology.
Kyle put the accusation to him plainly: that Jenrick had "doctored" the clip so that White appeared to say the opposite of what she meant. Jenrick's response ran through several distinct moves, each doing different rhetorical work.
1. "It's very confused" — manufacturing ambiguity where none exists.
This phrase is the anchor of his entire defence. It does a lot of work precisely because it's vague: it invites the listener to assume there's a genuine, unresolved factual dispute, perhaps a poor recording, or an ambiguous turn of phrase.
But "confused" is not an accurate description of a situation where specific words have been swapped for others ("who will" for "if we") and a clarifying second clause has been removed. That isn't ambiguity; it's a checkable, binary fact about what is or isn't on the recording. Framing it as "confused" moves the dispute from the realm of the verifiable into the realm of the unresolvable, which is precisely where a fair-minded-sounding non-denial wants to sit.
2. Recasting the original quote as self-contradictory.
Jenrick describes White as appearing to say "with one breath" that she wants to stop the boats, then "with the next breath" that she doesn't care. This is a subtle but important move: he is not describing the edited clip as misleading (which would concede the point), nor defending the edited clip as accurate (which the evidence doesn't support), he is instead relocating the supposed contradiction into White's original, unedited remarks.
But the sentence he's characterising ("I don't care who stops them, my priority is that they're stopped") is not contradictory at all. It is a single, coherent statement about not caring which party or government gets credit. The only version in which a contradiction exists is the one Jenrick shared, which removed the words that resolved it.
3. "A perfectly reasonable point... asking her to explain."
This reframes an assertion as a question. But the graphic captioned White's words as a direct, declarative quote, presented as fact, not put to her as a query. You cannot retroactively convert a false statement of fact into an open question by describing it that way after the fact.
4. "She says the recording isn't quite right."
This line minimises what White actually did. She didn't raise a vague objection about audio quality; she released a recording with matching ambient markers that demonstrates the specific substitution. Describing this as her merely saying the clip "isn't quite right" downgrades a documented discrepancy to the level of a subjective complaint, which then sets up his next move.
5. "Recollections vary... like the royal family".
Imho, this is the most consequential sentence in the interview. By invoking Prince Harry's line about the Queen and Meghan Markle, Jenrick reframes what is, in principle, a resolvable factual question (what is on the tape?) as a matter of subjective memory (what do different people recall from a meeting?), which by definition cannot be adjudicated.
This is a category substitution: a dispute about the content of a recording (which either does or does not contain certain words) is recast as a dispute about human recollection, which can never be fully settled. It is a rhetorically effective move precisely because "recollections vary" sounds reasonable and humble, while quietly removing the question from the domain where it could actually be checked.
6. Non-response to the fuller quote.
When Kyle read White's fuller statement back to him on air ("I don't care who will stop the boats, but my number one priority is to stop those boats") Jenrick did not engage with its content. His reply, "Well, let's see, let's see," treats a piece of evidence directly bearing on the question as if it were still an open, future-tense matter, rather than something to be assessed on the spot. This is a stalling move: it lets him avoid either conceding the point or contesting it with a counter-argument.
7. The core denial.
Asked directly whether he'd made a mistake, Jenrick said: "No, I don't think so." Everything else in the interview functions to make that denial sound reasonable, without addressing the specific, checkable claim against him, namely that the clip he posted altered her words in a way that inverted their meaning.
Jenrick's manipulative framing lets him appear conciliatory without ever conceding that the original post was inaccurate or that posting it was a misjudgement.
Since Ann Widdecombe's murder (described by police as a targeted attack, and now the subject of a counter-terrorism investigation) Jenrick has spoken repeatedly and forcefully about the dangers of political rhetoric, the need for civility in public debate, and the responsibility owed to people in public life who face threats and abuse for their views. He has argued that politicians holding views "outside the mainstream" face heightened risk, and has criticised the government for what he characterises as complacency about the safety of his colleagues.
That case is not unreasonable in the abstract. But it sits uneasily next to a documented episode in which he circulated, and Reform UK's official account amplified, a doctored quote attributed to a sitting MP, on one of the most inflammatory issues in British politics, and then, when confronted with clear evidence of the misrepresentation responded not by acknowledging the error but by reframing a checkable fact as an unresolvable dispute about memory.
Deleting the post without any correction or apology is not accountability; it is the quiet withdrawal of a claim without ever admitting the claim was false.
If dangerous rhetoric on immigration is a genuine concern, and the argument that heated, dehumanising language on this subject has consequences is one Jenrick himself has made in other contexts, then amplifying a false quote from a fellow MP on precisely that subject, and then defending it through rhetorical sleight of hand rather than correction, is difficult to square with that concern.
The inconsistency is not that Jenrick worries about MPs' safety; it's that concern for the tone of political debate applies asymmetrically: vocally invoked when the threat is to his own side, and set aside when the tactic in question is his own.
Imho, the @HoCStandards should launch a formal investigation.
Interview clip:
https://t.co/nwpnEOjrmn
🐉𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗧𝗦 | Final countdown! Join us 🔙 at @rodneyparade as we face @BlueBullsRugby in the @URCOfficial tomorrow!🔥
🚨 Last few seats in Bisley - will be sold out soon!
🚨 Candleston Stand filling fast too!
🎟️ https://t.co/SLpbeB4H3R
📞 01633 670690
#WeAreGwentRugby
Director Derek Jarman was born on this day in 1942. He was one of the first people in the UK to speak openly about living with HIV.
Maggi Hambling created this portrait of him, and a donation from each purchase supports our work.
https://t.co/ohszrjBYjW
27 years ago I was in similar position to David, Julie, Rhian, Chris and Stephen, setting out why I wanted to be Labour’s candidate for Newport East. Today was beginning of handing over the baton, as they each gave their pitches to be our Senedd candidates for Casnewydd Islwyn.
Important we unite as a city & clearly stand against the WRU’s proposal to cut the number of regions from 4 to 2. I’ve already made our position clear, but I hope all cllrs from across the political spectrum support the motion below and sign the letter to the WRU @dragonsrfc
The Disabled Children’s Team welcomed children and young people to the complex play scheme during summer holidays.
They enjoyed sensory play, arts and crafts and physical activity.
Another significant step for Newport’s economic future: the construction of a new Microsoft AI data centre. This is part of Microsoft’s £2.5bn investment in the UK. Positive conversation with the Head of Microsoft UK about a training centre where we could upskill local people.
While visiting our schools, headteachers have told us about things that need doing at their school. We listened & I’m super pleased we have managed to grant over £1m to 8 schools before the end of term, including 100k to Malpas Park Primary for a new perimeter fence & gates.
People ask why I’m bullish on Newport’s future. Today KLA opened a $137M world-class facility here, creating 750 skilled, high-paying jobs. They build machines that make the chips powering the AI revolution—98% exported. British advanced manufacturing, right on our doorstep.
The Welsh Government has announced
transport funding for local authorities across Wales.
This support is designed to help keep communities
connected, safe, and moving.
Here’s what it means for Newport.
Labour doorstep in Alway this morning with the @NewportEastLab . Unlike other political parties locally, we are out speaking to voters all year round 🌹