I have literally NEVER watched an episode of Candace Owen's discussing Charlie Kirk.
But because I believe in thorough investigation of everyone surrounding Charlie Kirk I'm accusing Erika Kirk of murder and I'm a Russian spybot?
Are you people literally retarded?
You all haven't seen a single day of trial yet and already decided this Tyler guy is guilty as sin?
How very convenient for the MASSIVE group of politicians and leaders who didn't appreciate someone out there speaking the truth and winning hearts and minds.
Do you not see how much of a problem he was? Not just the Israel thing, given that he accused them of genocide, but our own government? He was waking people up to corruption, and meaningful change, and a path forward, and Christ.
Do you not understand how threatening he was to the entire establishment? Our government exists to divide you, control you, and enslave you. They operate in problem creation and perpetuation. And they sell you false hope in fake solutions.
He was dismantling that. Brick by brick. And he may not have even known it. He was young and naive, not realizing the pursuit of truth, and speaking it loudly, is the ultimate sin in our society.
If anyone killed Kirk, even if it was Tyler, it was OUR GOVERNMENT that likely made it happen. Directly or indirectly.
But sure, continue to play TEAM CANDACE or TEAM TPUSA, like you keep playing red and blue, Democrat and Republican, and every other load of crap.
You're all brain rot.
Andrew
Let me offer advice.
Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.
When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.
Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.
That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.
Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.
Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.
You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.
That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.
So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.
Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.
You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.
@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@JohnMappin@ImMappin@joekent16jan19@TRobinsonNewEra@LionelMedia@IanCarrollShow@AwakenWithJP@jimmy_dore@OwenBenjamin@leahfiles@realstewpeters@EstulinVz@RealAlexJones@HarrisonHSmith@BlakeSNeff@TPUSA@DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel
There are so many devastating points to the Tyler Robinson narrative but chief among them is Lance Twiggs testifying that Tyler wasn’t political, didn’t ever speak to him about LBGTQ issues OR gender identity issues— and also alluding to that fact that he is not trans. He goes by “Luna” but he says it is not a female identity. (Likely some gamer or anime stuff imo).
For months, Satanists have been trying to convince you that Tyler was soooo motivated by politics and trans ideology, that he decided to murder Charlie Kirk for trans viewpoints that Tyler held so dearly, he never even expressed them his boyfriend.
Until a stunning text message confession after the murder, shown to us via a picture on Lance’s phone which just happens to be smashed in the very corner that would allow us to verify what time these photos were taken.
This is all very dangerous. The government is playing a very dangerous game here with this trial. The illusion of democracy and a social contract is being completely evaporated. We are not supposed to know that our government is capable of this level of violence and psychological delusion.
How absolutely unfortunate that the damage to Lance Twiggs's phone screen is a nearly perfect circle exactly over the time display.
Totally freak accident, I'm sure. How would one even go about trying to reproduce damage like this?!
We Know What You Did Last Summer, Andrew. your Cruel Intentions were Super Bad. Legally Blonde Mean Girls like frantzve are Clueless thinking She’s All That, Twilight Zone. This is Not Another Teen Movie. there are Titanic cracks in The Matrix, Bring It On. The Dark Night Now and Then is a Memento one never forgets onto their Final Destination.
Andrew Kolvet posted this on TikTok about 3 hours ago. NOW he has questions? Ten months later 🤨? Also, I wonder why he didn’t post this on X or Instagram. What is he trying to accomplish with this little skit? The comments passed the vibe check (as the kids say).
@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman
@WeAreNotGTM Wait so theoretically the device was ALSO set to go but did not and hence happened in the vehicle? TIA- looks like this is the best working theory I've seen thus far.
Hi everyone 👋
One of my best friends needs help after a 4th cancer diagnosis. Help me so he can focus on healing & ease his stress. I love him dearly. Anything helps & I will forever be appreciative if you can donate. Thank you so much. Mandie https://t.co/VQrm8CN5dB