@gfery@franceinfo On ne la manipule pas elle fait partie de la manipulation, de la propagande et donc la cause est questionable.
Γa ne devrait pas Γͺtre un pb que les sportifs parlent de paix, ce st des citoyens comme tt le monde. Malheureusemt ces joueuses ukrainiennes ne parlent JAMAIS de paix
Oooh the system...π
These UKRAINIAN PLAYERS NEVER CALL FOR PEACE. The word "Peace" doesn't exist in their dictionary.
All they know is to throw personal attack to players who, unless proven otherwise, aren't part of the Russian army nor financing it.
They are insufferable.
Kostyuk was invited on France's main news show:
"A lot of times people tell me that Russian players can't stop the war and they prefer not to talk about it. But for me, it's a question of humanity. As a human, I have no respect for them, and I don't want to shake their hand."
@Scriptyze@TheTennisLetter Nobody except his team and family knows what he has. For years the media and former players said that Rafa was often injured because of his playing style. Nobody knew he suffered from MΓΌller-Weiss syndrome.
So all this are just bs speculations.
A few more thoughts following @susanabulhawa's pointed and correct questions to me:
1. The trappings of supremacy, one that has been fostered in me since before my birth, are difficult to shake off regardless of any and all conscious attempts to grow past them. Only supremacy can square circles. A desire on my part to articulate a personal position regarding the genocide requires diligence and responsibility that are all on me.
2. When I suggested that "right makes right" I wrongly implied that the establishment of Israel, from 1917 onwards, is simply a "right". I would ascribe this to that all-pervailing supremacy in which I was raised, but this does not diminish my full responsibility for my words.
3. That said, I don't believe in equating justice with symmetry. Israeli Jews suggesting that the genocide is "justified" by the Hamas attack of 7.10.23, and that this justification is valid from here to eternity, are an abomination. Twitterites telling me that I can only leave immediately (to "return home") in order to save my soul are stating a position I cannot espouse.
4. Moreover, a major part of Israel's evil is precisely this convulted pretense to "symmetry". I reject it not as an Israeli, but as what I perceive to be human in me. If the struggle for good is based on a page out of the Israeli playbook, that (I think) is a problem.
5. I think the two state solution is not just dead, but that it was always detrimental. It is based on the notion that, left to their own devices within one state, the Palestinians will simply set about attempting to kill all the Jews (as Jews, "peace loving nation", will have no choice but to kill all the Palestinians first). This makes the 2SS "necessary".
6. I would like to see a single state in which Jews and Palestinians live in full equality. In the process leading up to the formation of such a state, Palestinians must first be assured of receiving all their legal rights alongside reparations. Justice here is also not symmetrical. Israeli Jews need to stay quiet for a very long time. In this state every religious denomination should be allowed the freedom to practice its religion in peace. I would like to think of a multifocal one state rather than one state based on negative freedoms.
Somebody with a π in his bio defending the zionist B. Sanders π³
Being pro-Palestinian is a trend or what? Because how is that possible? It's not even the 1st time that Sanders shows he is a pure zio.
@tiberiusfiles this is an appalling misquote. he said he supported a two state solution because in a one state I srael would disappear. I have my issues with him, but the words in brackets in the video you quote are NOT what he said.
@SassClassNiceAs@ShaneWiskthem Whatever. So only women have biases. 1) there is no evidence it's a bias 2) you cannot prove that a man wouldn't have done the same.
You really sound as misogynistic as this sore loser.
He has never condemned the genocide of Palestine and never uttered the word "genocide" in that respect but you didn't want to or couldn't listen. Now he's telling you clear and simple.
As a longtime supporter of yours, @SenSanders: this is truly appalling.
If an end to apartheid means an end to Israel - then youβre de facto admitting that Israel can only exist through oppression and violence.
You cannot condemn genocide while supporting the very foundations for that genocide.
And I, for one, cannot support this/you anymore.