🧬 Can neural networks and GPUs change RNA-seq analysis?
An interactive guide leads to two questions:
🧠 Can a neural network approximate EM?
⚡ Can GPUs make richer alignment practical again?
Bioinformatics feedback welcome:
https://t.co/qPGj1MSmK2
#RNASeq#Bioinformatics
@cos_francois@cos_francois Do you have ablation study for different abstraction layer from math definition -> PyTorch -> Triton -> TTIR -> LLVM IR to PTX?
I’m curious for how much abstraction layer does an AI compiler actually need?
@_albertgu Hey Albert! I’m Tien-Yu, an ML engineer based in Taipei exploring SSM research . Would love to say hi or chat if you’re open to it while you’re in town! Just sent you an email with a bit more context 🙌
@anneouyang (2/2) Do you see this approach generalizing beyond PyTorch-to-CUDA translation, for example, toward generating code for other compiler targets like C++ backends or broader compiler abstraction layers (like LLVM compiler)?
@anneouyang (1/2) Have you considered whether fine-tuning the language model on domain-specific materials like the CUDA Programming Guide or PTX ISA documentation might further improve the quality or correctness of generated kernels?
@EyubogluSabri Will using more complex architecture for the Cartridges save training cost from self-study? Just a random and intuition thought, the models might learn more info than current setting 🤔
I don’t think people need any high level programming languages in the end. Just assembly languages are enough, high level languages are for human but not for machines.
It's 2025 and most content is still written for humans instead of LLMs. 99.9% of attention is about to be LLM attention, not human attention.
E.g. 99% of libraries still have docs that basically render to some pretty .html static pages assuming a human will click through them. In 2025 the docs should be a single your_project.md text file that is intended to go into the context window of an LLM.
Repeat for everything.