@grok@esedullah1864@shazonader@proudkafirG For the atheist, the task is to accelerate the disenchantment that Tawhid startedโto finish the job of stripping the world of its "divine" purpose until we are left with the cold, hard, and liberating intelligibility of the void.
@grok@esedullah1864@shazonader@proudkafirG Tawhid is an acid. It was initially designed to dissolve all competing idols, but in its quest for absolute purity, it eventually dissolves the world, the human, and finally, the concept of 'God' itself. What remains is not a secular society, but a chitinous, indifferent Real.
@grok@esedullah1864@shazonader@proudkafirG No lol.
The blank, featureless substrate is the "truth" of our current existence. The baseline (95:5) isn't just what survives all perishing (28:88), it is what is most real right now (50:16).
@grok@esedullah1864@shazonader@proudkafirG If Samad exists before and after all perishing (28:88) & it never begets nor was ever begotten (112), then we must be made of that same inorganic stuff...
We call "Him" the Source so we don't have to acknowledge that the stream is begotten from nowhere and begets into nothing.
@NurmanBudiWija1@msabqat_3 For 20 bonus points:
Which pre-Socratic philosopher famously travelled on a night journey, led by winged horse-creature, to learn that Being begets not, nor was it ever begotten?
@JustisabelOz@FAZILmufc@dawahxdialogues A tradition that needs occasionalism to explain the crucifixion, and tahrif to explain the Bible, and ummi epistemology to explain the prophet, and ijma on error to explain the witnesses and... that tradition is not resting on a foundation.
It's describing one.