@LionelHutz_Esq@SirHiss108@zipjet@slk349390919 Lionel, thanks for your thoughts. Have you seen the UBS experts comments on probability of Hatch-Waxman remedies applying in $uthr win and your opinion?
@AnnaFlorcia@zipjet I wouldn’t place too high a weight on LLM probabilities - they are highly sensitive to change depending on even subtleties like from whose perspective you ask.
@paperhands91@AnnaFlorcia@zipjet@vrotjan So I’ve been playing around with LLMs on this all weekend too. It generally rules in favour of lqda initially but when I attach UBS transcript with their legal expert opinion, the LLM changes its opinion and sides with legal expert
@AnnaFlorcia@zipjet@vrotjan@AnnaFlorcia - I think the million dollar question is, in event of lqda loss, will remedies be under true hatch-waxman framework? If they are, the letter of law remedy is full injunction - no discretion. So it really comes down to, is there sufficient judicial wiggle room.
@paperhands91@zipjet Do you know anyone with access to UBS research? Basically the four factor eBay test only applies if standard patent infringement, not if tried as hatch-waxman case. He gives it a hand wavy 60pct chance - but I personally don’t know framework / how to handicap
@InvestSpecial $thryv: goodco (SaaS) vs badco (Ypages - melting ice cube). SaaS business growing 20pct+ / low churn, with margin expansion, but hidden by decline of Ypages. By 2030, should be pure play SaaS. Mcap ~ 500mn, SaaS rev should do $1bn with 20pct ebitda margins by 2030. Great mgmt too
@AskeladdenTX $thryv: goodco (SaaS) vs badco (Ypages - melting ice cube). SaaS business growing 20pct+ / low churn, with margin expansion, but hidden by decline of Ypages. By 2030, should be pure play SaaS. Mcap ~ 500mn, SaaS rev should do $1bn with 20pct ebitda margins by 2030. Great mgmt too
@zipjet Yes - when asking about ‘327 lawsuit it gave high odds of $lqda when I asked q from an $lqda perspective, and even odds for $uthr when asked from $uthr perspective