@TexasRepublic71 Looks like they missed a number in address. 11611 W Airport Blvd is listed as W. Airport Center. I’m not sure if there is a Suite 123, but there is a UPS store there. Perhaps somebody should go do a first amendment audit there and see what sort of freaks come out.
@Taleeb@Conservative_BC@CPC_HQ@LDoerkson speaking the truth is not Islamaphobia. You should also be speaking out against the horrors and evil committed by fellow members of your religion.
@nytimes@TheAthletic Nice that the New York Times and The Athletic continue to employ racist, douche bag columnists that hate white people and want to destroy anyone standing up for girls sports.
@YouWontFeelThis@ryanlovesball Many calls should’ve been against Las Vegas so they had a double impact. Many others were just phantom calls where there was no foul. I didn’t see any phantom calls or misplaced calls that favoured Indiana.
They were using a faulty method of identifying bodies which has been proving time and time again not to be accurate. Here are some examples.:
The clearest documented pre-Kamloops Canadian case matching this description is the 2016–2017 archaeological assessment for the replacement of New Westminster Secondary School in British Columbia.
The site lay next to historic cemeteries (including Potter’s Field and others used from the 1860s into the early 20th century). Golder Associates used ground-penetrating radar and identified 38 anomalies as potential gravesites. Follow-up “ground-truthing” with boreholes and test excavations found no graves or burial-related features. The signals came from cobbles, boulders, and PVC or drain pipes. The June 2017 final report stated that no gravesites or evidence of historic cemetery use were located in the project area. School district statements confirmed the buildable zone was clear of known burials, and known cemetery sections were set aside for memorialization rather than construction.
A smaller forensic example from 2009 involved the Edmonton Police using GPR under a residential basement floor while searching for a missing child. The scan produced a signature consistent with a burial; excavation found only the results of a prior water leak, with no evidence a body had been present. The consulting forensic anthropologist later noted that GPR’s relatively low resolution can produce similar signatures for different subsurface disturbances at comparable depths, including pipes.
These outcomes align with longstanding technical limits of the method. GPR detects changes in soil density or composition (such as a dug shaft, pipe, rock, root, or old excavation), not bones or organic remains. Older graves become harder to distinguish as remains mineralize into the surrounding soil. Experts have repeatedly noted that open fields produce many false positives from rocks, wood, irrigation lines, and septic components, and that confirmation requires excavation. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s 2015 report on missing children and unmarked burials listed GPR as one possible mapping tool but cautioned that such methods “seldom produce results that are immediately and intuitively interpretable” and require “post-survey validity testing” by excavation.
Later residential-school site excavations (for example, the 2023 dig at Pine Creek, Manitoba, which targeted 14 basement anomalies identified by GPR) likewise recovered no human remains, only items such as nails and construction debris.
Why did Trump ban certain members of the press? @sjkokinda of @PrometheanActn does an excellent job summarizing why Trump threw three news organizations out of the White House, and the reason why they were put there in the first place.
You’ll want to save this and share it.