@TheTerribleTeam@FearedBuck No one harassed anybody until that old man harassed them and started following them.
They complied and left the store when asked to.
Stop coping.
@JohnathanM90581@BmacIvc AASI, Onge, Papuans, Australian Aboriginals, Hoabinhian all are probably similar to how early Basal East Eurasians looked (even though they all still look different) but it was the Basal East Eurasians which gave rise to the Basal East Asians.
https://t.co/uSngEejp7u
@limbu213@WetbackP45810@Ghost949687 Lighten the skin of some Onge people and their features closely resemble the traits that exist in most modern East Eurasian populations
@JohnathanM90581@BmacIvc The Paniya's mans eyes look more East Asian to me.
The other Indian man's eyes look more rounded/almond shaped to me.
Perhaps there are other differences but those are the ones that stand out the most to me.
@Kosteckk@SamAndrews1017 Merging the Zagros/CHG would probably be more accurate (although Southern Europeans will have elevated Zagros/CHG admixture.)
Additionally, if you measure mesolithic DNA, Zagros/CHG/Natufian will be even more elevated since ANF was not purely AHG:
https://t.co/KWtI9kHLrq
G25 is bad for this.
Actual natufian ancestry is MUCH lower across populations.
The level of replacement by ANFs and also Zagrosian-dominant groups was HUGE in Neolithic West Asia.
Egyptians πͺπ¬ and some Ethiopians πͺπΉ now have the most Natufian ποΈ ancestry.
@JohnathanM90581@BmacIvc Perhaps, but for me it's mainly the eyes that are different.
But that is just my opinion, i'm not Indian so i'm not an expert when it comes to Indian phenotypes.
@Kosteckk@SamAndrews1017 You should add Zagros. ApparentlyYamnaya wasn't actually just purely CHG + EHG like previously thought.
It also had some Zagros and even some Sarazm-like admixture (which is basically just Zagros/CHG + ANE and possibly some ANF admixture?)
Yamnaya qpAdm:
https://t.co/Ei3rHPdG1v