25+ year Electrical Engineer / Program Manager in Aerospace & Defense, US Army Veteran, UT Longhorn, Day Trader, Husband, Father, Christian, Road Cyclist
🚨TRUTH: Journalists didn’t just fail during COVID — they actively betrayed us.
When the narrative changed...
"One shot and you're safe"
"Two shots"
"Boosters forever"
"Cloth masks work"
"No, surgical masks"
"No, N95s"
"Double masking"
"Your mask doesn’t work unless everyone wears one"
... they never asked real questions.
... they never pushed back.
... they never held anyone accountable.
Instead of exposing contradictions, journalists became cheerleaders for lies.
Instead of protecting democracy, they demolished it.
Instead of questioning "the science," they enforced it like a religion.
They canceled real scientists.
They smeared truth-tellers as "COVID deniers" and "anti-vaxxers."
They pushed millions into taking shots that cost billions of life years worldwide.
And to this day, there has been no apology. No accountability. The liars still work, and the people who told the truth got fired.
Every journalist who pushed these lies, every journalist who shamed, discriminated, and canceled, must be held accountable.
This cannot go unpunished.
Not after what they did to the world.
By the way:
Throughout all the lies, censorship, and gaslighting, there were a few voices who stood strong.
Those citizen journalists, medical doctors, and scientists asked the hard questions when it was dangerous to do so.
They got smeared, silenced, and attacked — but they were right.
They deserve to be vindicated.
If you're looking for people worth listening to, the accounts below never wavered when it mattered most:
Prior to 1970 Florida averaged 0.8 hurricanes per year, but since 1970 Florida has only averaged 0.5 hurricanes per year. Florida had no hurricanes from 2006-2015.
#ClimateScam
https://t.co/Z8dhizTNN9
US temperatures before 2008 are "adjusted" downwards, and temperatures after 2008 are adjusted upwards. It is propaganda, not climate or science
#ClimateScam
🚨REMINDER: None of the vaccines that the CDC recommends for routine injection in children have been approved by the FDA based on a long-term placebo-controlled study.
The irony is that Trump is nothing like Hitler, but Biden—and his cabinet members and top FBI, DOJ, and CIA, through lawfare and various psyops, in collusion with media, are quite similar to the Nazi Party and clearly use the tactics by which they held power.
It is the very power that their propaganda media wields over the weak-minded that brought us to the assassination attempt yesterday. It may have actually been a contracted hit. The shooter may have been convinced by his contractors that he would be whisked off to the Bahamas, rather than immediately shot and killed after he took his shots. Much of the evidence points to an inside job, including the obfuscation of the shooter’s identity.
But the fact that Democrats are celebrating the violence, and are still locked in this matrix of lies created by the most corrupt administration in history, makes me truly wish there was a way to separate the country into nation-states in order to regain governmental sanity—at least for those of us who have not fallen prey to the propaganda of the Democrat Party.
Assassination Porn and the Sickness on the Left
If we were leftists and we were to use leftist tropes to editorialize the recent attempt on Trump’s life, then we would frame the assassination attempt in the following way:
We have witnessed for years blatant exceptions to the once common custom that we don’t normalize the imagined killing of any president or presidential candidate and thus lower the bar of violence.
But the Left constantly makes Trump an exception. Now, it as if the imagined killing of Trump had been mainstreamed and become acceptable in a way inconceivable of other presidents.
(Do we remember the rodeo clown who merely wore an Obama mask during a bull riding contest and was punished by being permanently banned by the Missouri State Fair authorities?)
So since at least 2016 there has been a parlor game among Leftist celebrities and entertainers joking (one hopes), dreaming, imagining, and just talking about the various and graphic ways they would like to assassinate or seriously injure Trump:
By slugging his face (Robert De Niro), by decapitation (Kathy Griffin, Marilyn Manson), by stabbing (Shakespeare in the Park), by clubbing (Mickey Rourke), by shooting ( Snoop Dogg), by poisoning (Anthony Bourdain), by bounty killing (George Lopez), by carrion eating his corpse (Pearl Jam), by suffocating (Larry Whilmore), by blowing him up (Madonna, Moby), by throwing him over a cliff (Rosie O’Donnell), just by generic “killing” him (Johnny Depp, Big Sean), or by martyring him (Reid Hoffman: “Yeah, I wish I had made him an actual martyr.”).
Or should we deplore the use of telescopic scope imagery, given that the Left blamed Sarah Palin for once using bullseye spots on an election map of opposition congressional districts, claiming that such usage had incited the mass shooting by Jared Lee Loughner?
Yet, recently POTUS Joe Biden was a little bit more graphic and a lot more literal.
In a widely reported call to hundreds of donors last week, Biden boasted, “I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump. I’m absolutely certain I’m the best person to be able to do that. So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
"In a bullseye?”
At least, Biden did not go back to the full Biden beat-up porn of the past (e.g., “If we were in high school, I’d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him"/ “The press always asks me, ‘Don’t I wish I were debating him?’ No, I wish we were in high school – I could take him behind the gym. That’s what I wish.”).
Then there is the question of the Secret Service and one’s political opponents. Given the tragic history of the Kennedys, why in the world did the Biden administration not insist that third-party candidate Robert Kennedy, Jr. be accorded Secret Service protection? Because his candidacy was felt to be disadvantageous to Biden?
And why just this April would the former head of the January 6th Committee and 2004 election obstructionist Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) introduce legislation ridiculously entitled, “Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable (DISGRACED) Former Protectees Act” to strip away Secret Service protection for former President Trump and by this April current leading presidential candidate?
Had Thompson’s bill passed, would that not have been confirmation for a potential shooter to feel his task was just made much easier?
But in a wider sense, if the common referent day after day on the Left is that Trump is another Hitler (cf. a recent The New Republic cover where Trump is literally photoshopped as Hitler), then it seems reckless not to imagine an unhinged or young shootist believing that by taking out somewhat identical to one of the greatest mass murderers in history, he would be applauded for his violence?
So is their logic, shoot Trump and save six million from the gas chambers?
After all, The New Republic defiantly explained their Hitler-Trump cover photo this way, "Today, we at The New Republic think we can spend this election year in one of two ways. We can spend it debating whether Trump meets the nine or 17 points that define fascism. Or we can spend it saying, “He’s damn close enough, and we’d better fight.”
Well, New Republic, recently someone took you up on your argument that Trump was “damn close enough” to Hitler and so he likewise chose to “fight”— albeit with a semi-automatic rifle.
If ad nauseam, a Joy Reid is screaming about Trump as a Hitlerian dictator ("Then let me know who I got to vote for to keep Hitler out of the White House”) or Rachel Maddow is bloviating about studying Hitler to understand Trump, then finally the message sinks in that a mass murderer is about to take power—unless....
Finally, the idea, if true, that bystanders spotted a 20-year-old on a nearby roof with a gun, a mere 130 yards from Trump, and in vain warned police of his presence, is surreal.
Is it all that hard for the Secret Service to post a few agents on the tops of a few surrounding buildings closest to the dais, or at least coordinate with local law enforcement to do the same?
That is a no brainer. Whoever made the decisions concerning the proper secret service security details for presidential events should be immediately fired.
🚨 NEW REPORT: How the World's Biggest Brands Seek to Control Online Speech
New info reveals that woke advertisers and brands are colluding together to attack people like @elonmusk, @joerogan, political candidates, and news organizations.
Read it here: https://t.co/3TTNysFrv4
For those who don't understand what Chevron Deference is, and why SCOTUS ended it, here's the long and short of it:
A family fishing company, Loper Bright Enterprises, was being driven out of business, because they couldn't afford the $700 per day they were being charged by the National Marine Fisheries Service to monitor their company.
The thing is, federal law doesn't authorize NMFS to charge businesses for this. They just decided to start doing it in 2013.
Why did they think they could away with just charging people without any legal authorization?
Because in 1984, in the Chevron decision, the Supreme Court decided that regulatory agencies were the "experts" in their field, and the courts should just defer to their "interpretation" of the law.
So for the past 40 years, federal agencies have been able to "interpret" laws to mean whatever they want, and the courts had to just go with it.
It was called Chevron Deference, and it put bureaucrats in charge of the country.
It's how the OHSA was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab, or be fired.
No law gave them that authority, they just made it up.
It's how the ATF was able to decide a piece of plastic was a "machine gun".
It's how the NCRS was able to decide that a small puddle was a "protected wetlands".
It's how out-of-control agencies have been able to create rules out of thin air, and force you to comply, and the courts had to simply defer to them, because they were the "experts".
Imagine if your local police could just arrest you, for any reason, and no judge or jury was allowed to determine if you'd actually committed a crime or not. Just off to jail you go.
That's what Chevron Deference was.
It was not only blatantly unconstitutional, it caused immeasurable harm to everyone.
Thankfully, it's now gone.
We haven't even begun to feel the effects of this decision in the courts. It will be used, for years to come, to roll back federal agencies, and we'll all be better of for it.
And that's why politicians and corporate media are freaking out about it.