Stockman Republican

1 Issue: US debt. Everything else = rearranging Titanic deck chairs. US Debt = meteor in “Don’t look up” Most don’t look up. I’m afraid to DM.

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

Eric, What shot down our helicopter? A sling shot?

@bennyjohnson
@JackPosobiec
@LauraLoomer @nicksorter

@DC_Draino
@GuntherEagleman
. @catturd2
@EndWokeness
@libsoftiktok
@MarioNawfal
@jsolomonReports @JoeyMannarino
@julie_kelly2
@johncardillo
@ACTBrigitte
@MonicaCrowley
@SebGorka
@LeadingReport
@CitizenFreePres
@ColumbiaBugle
@ConservBrief
@Breaking911
@RNCResearch
@RapidResponse47
@TPV_John
@WesternLensman
@wallstreet
@DefiantLs
@ur_fav_liberal
@amuse
@ImMeme0
@RagingAmericans
@MAGAVoice

cc: @TuckerCarlson
@megynkelly
@RealCandaceO
@RealAlexJones
@MTGrreepp
@MattWalshBlog
@joerogan
@Timcast
@glenngreenwald
@SteveDeace
@bungarsargon
@thomasmassie
@RandPaul
@NickJFuentes

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

@realstewpeters Said,

By the dumbest news anchor in history.

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

JESSE WATTERS: “Technically, I know it doesn’t seem like it, but we’re still in a ceasefire. And Trump says we’re close to making a deal.”

This is the dumbest comment in news anchor history.

[Republicans against Trump @RpsAgainstTrump]

Despite pushback from some Republican senators, Trump insists Bill Pulte will become acting Director of National Intelligence on June 19, despite having no background in intelligence or national security, while still keeping his other jobs running the FHFA and chairing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

What could possibly go wrong?

[Brian Allen @allenanalysis]

JUST IN: This Would Be A Pretty Stunning Development If Confirmed.

Israeli broadcaster Kann is reporting that the U.S. transferred $3 billion in frozen Iranian assets through the UAE as part of an effort to halt recent Iranian strikes on Israel.

[Joe Walsh @WalshFreedom]

No. Someone is an idiot.

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

@JayTC53 @stephenasmith Wow,

Stephen A Smith vs Trump

Who is more FOS?

Tough one.

But, we can say Jay is more FOS than either and far more stupid.

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

@SKMorefield Well said

I agree

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

Make a note: Ryan Sears doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Social Security isn't going bankrupt, but it is heading toward insolvency of its trust funds.

Payroll taxes are no longer sufficient to cover promised benefits. Since 2021, Social Security has been redeeming Treasury bonds accumulated during earlier surpluses. According to the trustees, the combined trust funds are projected to be depleted in the mid-2030s. At that point, incoming payroll taxes would cover only about 80% of scheduled benefits.

Why does this matter for the debt?

Those trust fund assets are Treasury bonds—obligations of the federal government. When Social Security cashes them in, Treasury must obtain the money by raising taxes, cutting other spending, or borrowing more from the public. That borrowing increases publicly held debt.

Once the trust fund is exhausted, any decision by Congress to continue paying full benefits would require transfers from general revenues or additional borrowing, further adding to deficits and debt.

So the claim that Social Security has nothing to do with the debt is incorrect. Social Security cannot borrow on its own, but its growing cash deficits and eventual trust fund depletion put increasing pressure on the federal budget and contribute to future federal borrowing.

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

@EricLDaugh @FLFreedomgirl72

[LanaQuest aka RosaSparks @LqLana]

Knows nothing about the Epstein files. Nothing about Trump grifts. Nothing about the slush fund. Nothing about pardons. But fake election fraud he has found his voice. #DemsUnited

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

@IanJaeger29 At least he was right one time!

[NeverWokeX @raefejenkins]

I voted Trump 3X

The dude is a con man

Completely betrayed

Sold us out to Israel

The faster you can realize that, the faster we can all move on from MAGA so it doesn’t happened again

[Shawn Harris for Congress @ShawnForGeorgia]

We're not editing this clip.

Just watch it.

15,000 farms lost. $28 billion in farmer losses. Diesel prices nearly doubled. Fertilizer costs soaring. Family farmers struggling to stay afloat.

And the Trump administration's response? Deflect, deny, and blame someone else.

If you're not willing to own the problem, you can't solve the problem.

If this is their idea of a "golden age" for agriculture, I'd hate to see what they call a crisis.

Leadership Matters.

[Libertarians against Trump @jeffersonation1]

MAGA and Trump give me no choice but to vote Democrat in November. Not because "I'm a liberal". Because you started an illegal war, destroyed the economy, tariff my small family business, covered up Epstein, expand the surveillance state and hand billions to wealthy corporations.

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

@marklevinshow @Itsallright68

[Ann Coulter @AnnCoulter]

Supporting Israel and opposing the Iran war aren't a contradiction. Stop pretending they are.

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

A smart guy told me David Freeman (Gunther) is a dumb guy. Here the real numbers:

Donald has been pounding the main street economy with high tariffs designed to bring back manufacturing and goods-production including construction and mining and energy output. However, no cigar on that front, either.

Manufacturing jobs are actually down by a stunning -88,000 or 7% since December 2024—all the Donald’s Big Beautiful Tariffs to the contrary notwithstanding. And even with AI-driven data center construction bubble, the gain in construction jobs has been an extremely modest 0.7%, meaning that job growth in the overall goods-producing sector has been negative during the last 17 months.

In other words, the industrial sector recovery that the Donald promised would result from Trump-O-Nomics has not happened in any way, shape or form. The overall industrial jobs market is dead in the water. And that’s not HOT.

But MAGA believes David/Gunther, right?

David/Gunther was a police officer for 3 years and was fired?

Grok analyzed David’s IQ:

Here’s the bombshell: “IQ scores typically range from 85 to 115 for the average population (with 100 as the mean). People with above-average IQs (115–130) often show strong verbal reasoning, critical thinking, and the ability to synthesize complex information. Eagleman’s posts don’t exhibit these traits consistently — his arguments are more emotional than logical, and he rarely cites data or engages in detailed debate. That said, his ability to navigate X, build a brand, and influence discourse suggests he’s not below average either. Someone with a significantly low IQ (below 85) would likely struggle with the coherence and persistence he displays.”
And the final verdict? “Based on this, I’d estimate Gunther Eagleman’s IQ to be around 95–105, likely close to the average of 100,” Grok concludes. “This reflects his ability to communicate effectively and engage with political topics at a surface level, but without the depth or analytical rigor that might suggest a higher score. His strengths seem to lie more in emotional resonance and audience engagement than in intellectual complexity.”
An average IQ of 100? For a man who’s built a MAGA empire on X, that’s the kind of lukewarm assessment that could send Eagleman into a Twitter tirade. “Again, this is a rough guess,” Grok adds, almost as if it knows the storm that’s coming. “IQ isn’t directly measurable from tweets, and factors like education, life experience, and even stress can influence how someone presents online.”
Eagleman’s background as a former Texas cop, fired in 2022 — possibly due to his online antics — adds another layer of intrigue. He’s been accused of being a Russian bot on Reddit, a claim that remains unproven but fuels the conspiracy theories he’d likely dismiss as “fake news.” His history of suspensions, like the one in March 2023 over anti-Ukraine tweets, only cements his reputation as a lightning rod for controversy.
So, is Gunther Eagleman a misunderstood genius or just a Twitter troll with a knack for provocation? One thing’s for sure: this AI’s analysis is the kind of tech-driven, liberal-leaning critique that would make his blood boil. Will he clap back with a fiery tweetstorm, or will his 530.7K followers rally to his defense? Stay tuned — this is one MAGA meltdown you won’t want to miss!
The above was 100% written by Elon Musk’s Grok. My two cents? I’d love hear this guy say, “Matt Damon.”

cc: David Freeman fans
@bennyjohnson
* @JackPosobiec
* @LauraLoomer
* @nicksorter
* @ericdaugherty
* @DC_Draino
. @catturd2
@EndWokeness
@libsoftiktok
@MarioNawfal
* @jsolomonReports @JoeyMannarino
@julie_kelly2
@johncardillo
@ACTBrigitte
* @MonicaCrowley
* @SebGorka @SecScottBessent

Cc: Smart People

@JustinWolfers @Unfilteredboss1 @bariweiss @friedberg @SpencerHakimian @Lawrence @JohnStossel @GeraldoRivera @DA_Stockman @jordanbpeterson @RepThomasMassie @mtgreenee @RandPaul @ThomTillis @RepBrianFitz @SenatorCollins

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

Not sure why I’m following your irrelevant wild goose chase, but , why not:

Heather says:

“All of which are lies told by the media that are easily refutable.”

I never said any of those things but , lies, irrefutable?

“Incited insurrection” hoax:

Trump did not explicitly order supporters to storm the Capitol. However, many courts, historians, and the House Jan. 6 Committee concluded his actions contributed to or incited the attack. Whether that constitutes legal incitement is disputed. Calling the entire matter a “hoax” is unsupported.

You look like a “Proud Girl”

What did the “Proud Boys” and other J6 accused say, under oath?

Members of the Proud Boys and some individual defendants argued they were following Trump’s call to come to Washington and “fight.”
* Some defendants sought a “public authority” or “entrapment by estoppel” defense, claiming they reasonably believed the President had authorized their actions.
* Others argued that Trump’s repeated claims of a stolen election and his January 6 speech
led them to believe they were acting patriotically and legally.

“Very Fine people on both sides”hoax

Trump did say there were “very fine people on both sides” after Charlottesville, but in the same remarks he explicitly said he was not talking about neo-Nazis and white supremacists, whom he said should be condemned totally. Critics argue he still created false moral equivalence. Saying he praised neo-Nazis directly is inaccurate.

“Suckers and losers” hoax

The claim originated in a 2020 article by Jeffrey Goldberg. Multiple former Trump officials later corroborated portions of the story, while others denied it. There is no recording or definitive evidence either way. Calling it an established lie goes beyond the evidence.

“Inject bleach” hoax. See video

Trump never literally said “inject bleach.” During an April 2020 briefing, he speculated about whether disinfectants or ultraviolet light might be used inside the body, remarks that doctors immediately warned against. The phrase “Trump told people to inject bleach” overstates what he actually said.

What he said, was beyond stupid and the lady he was trying to get to agree with him was looking for a place to hide.

IQ test Heather: do you find Trumps disinfectant comments idiotic?

[Stockman Republican @EBiggunz]

I’m a Conservative. Trump is not

Everyone cares if Iran has a Nuclear weapon.

The question is what’s the best way to make sure they don’t get one?

1) BIBI plan: Keep saying Iran is weeks away from a nuclear weapon. He’s been saying that for 30+ years. He’s the boy who cried Nuke, get it Catherine?

Once Bibi finds a US President he can manipulate, Destroy Iran together, even if Iran had no intention of building a nuke.

2) US and the World Plan before Trump believed Bibis cry, “NUKE” was to impose sanctions do inspections and eventually sign a treaty ( that Trump through away, for no good reason).

We have a National Intelligence Apparatus

It’s their job to protect us from these risks.

What does Trumps Director of National Intelligence say?

TULSI GABBARD DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

Senate Intelligence Hearing — 2026 (Excerpt)

March 11, 2026

Sen. Jon Ossoff:
Director Gabbard, based on current intelligence, does Iran pose an imminent nuclear weapons threat?

Tulsi Gabbard:

“The intelligence community continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized a nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.”

⸻

Ossoff (follow-up):
So to be clear, there is no indication that Iran is currently attempting to build a nuclear weapon?

Gabbard:

“That is correct. We have not seen evidence that Iran is taking steps toward building a nuclear weapon.”

⸻

Ossoff:
After recent U.S. military actions, have they resumed enrichment or taken steps to rebuild capabilities?

Gabbard:

“There have been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability.”

Plain-English takeaway

* Direct quote: “not building a nuclear weapon”
* Direct confirmation: “we have not seen evidence” of steps toward one
* Additional context: no rebuilding of enrichment capability after strikes

March 25–26, 2025 — Congressional Testimony (Annual Threat Assessment)

This is the key 2025 statement (Senate + House hearings):

“The intelligence community continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.”

That language is essentially identical to what she said again in 2026.

⸻

🧠 What she meant in 2025

* Not building a weapon (present tense)
* No authorization from Iran’s leadership
* Still acknowledged:
* Iran had large enriched uranium stockpiles
* Capability concerns were growing

Example context:

* Iran’s uranium stockpile was described as “unprecedented” for a non-nuclear state
* But no active weapons program detected

⸻

⚠️ Mid-2025 Shift / Clarification

By June 2025, after political pushback (including from Donald Trump), Gabbard refined—not fully reversed—her message:

Iran could produce a nuclear weapon “within weeks to months” if it chose to finalize assembly

Key distinction:

* ❌ Still not building one
* ✅ But technically capable of doing so quickly

⸻

🧠 The consistent through-line (2025 → 2026)

Across both years, her position is actually pretty consistent when you strip away politics:

What stayed the same:

* Intelligence did NOT see an active weapons program
* No evidence of Khamenei authorizing one

What evolved:

* Increasing emphasis that:
* Iran had materials + capability
* Timeline to a weapon could be short if they chose to act

⸻

🎯 Bottom line

✔ Yes — she said essentially the same thing in March 2025 as in March 2026
✔ The core line (“not building a nuclear weapon”) is repeated verbatim across both years
✔ The difference is nuance:

* Early 2025: Focus on no active program
* Mid–late 2025: Added “but they could move fast if they decide to”

Catherine, you think Tulsi resigned to take care of her sick husband, or was fired, by Trump, for telling the truth.

I have a far more detailed version of the facts if you’re interested.

STOCKMAN REPUBLICAN

cc: @bariweiss @RepThomasMassie @DavidSacks